Because you made a thread about it?
Number of words one has to read on the linked page until it is absolutely clear that the Obama head is just an example: 128.
Number of words in the post you just wrote: 428.
So much for the "time out of your busy day".
Everyone can see exactly what happened here: you posted an Obama derangement thread suggesting that people were going to go get Obama heads, so you could make fun of them. The reality was nothing of the sort, they are not selling "Obama heads" any more than they are selling "Reagan heads". And all because you were too stupid to read the page before posting about it.
Now you're trying to suggest, ha ha, it was all a big joke. Which is obviously a lie, not only based on your first post, but this most recent one, which has comments like: "Some may even think it denigrating to the office of the Presidency."
Do yourself a favor and put down the shovel. But, well, you're probably too stupid to do that either.
As an aside, thank you for an absolutely classic example of why the new forum was created.
Charles, what exactly is wrong with you? I fully believe that you have a condition that needs treatment or is not getting the right treatment. You have got a hold of this innocuous thread with a death grip and you've become so obsessed with it that you are not making any sense.
I'd also like to congratulate you on some mild name calling directed towards me. If you think you're above the fray bub, you ain't.
I said it before and others have said it in this thread. You have a forum that is geared right towards your mindset. Why you don't stay in there and revel in all the nice and genteel discourse used to be a bit of wonder for me. No longer. I had you pegged correctly from your very first post here. I even offered you a form of détente early on and you turned it down. I publicly offered to ignore your posts if you ignored mine. Didn't fit into your agenda. So here we are still butting heads. You can not even ignore a thread that has no political implications to it whatsoever. sandorski got it right in the beginning, this thread did not belong in P&N and I realized that right after I read his post. It's not a political thread and many know this. But everything is political to you Charles and you've got your teeth sunk into this thread and you're just not going to let go. Don't look good...
You are a micro-managing progressive control freak who cannot allow others to operate outside of the tight constraints you wish to put on everyone. Many of us know this. You'd be happier in my estimation if you knew it too.
Yourself and our Mafia friend are lamenting that a new forum had to be created because of people like myself. It's there! The new forum is there! Yet, you keep coming back in here trying to raise this forum up to your high standards and pissing and moaning when it's not working. You have been given that which you so desperately wished to have and yet you are still unhappy and wish to change that which you should have left behind. In my opinion you'd do well to ponder my last several sentences. Why are you acting the way you're acting?
It has been eluded to before by others and I feel it's time to just lay it all right out on the line. You are the absolute wrong person for the job you have been given. You are one of the most divisive posters here. Your manner of communicating riles up a lot of folks. You continually try to straddle the fence purporting to see and even embrace both sides of an issue but your political path is progressive through and through and it permeates virtually every post you make. You cannot separate your views to the degree necessary from the task you have accepted here and for that reason you are not suited to the job.
I had you on ignore for a long time. When you turned down my offer, I took the high road and made both of our lives more pleasant by not having to directly see your posts. You could have ignored me but chose not to. A choice that was yours to make.
I can't ignore you now and you can't ignore me if you wished to.
Now, you're doing a word count on me. That's a little scary Charles. Am I going to see you on my doorstep or at my business at some point? That's a rhetorical question Charles.