• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

You will be assimilated

I think this is where the FTC should step in and block EA from buying out or merging with any other companies.
Click to expand...
Considering the feds are not going to stop Vivendi (owners of Blizzard Entertainment) from buying Activision and merging it with their games division, I doubt that they will block this. Vivendi's Blizzard-Activision should be as big or larger than an EA that owns Take 2.
 
Dear Strauss:

Thank you for your letter of February 15, 2008. While I appreciate its courteous tone and value our ongoing dialogue, I am disappointed that you have rejected Electronic Arts Inc.'s ("EA's") $25 per share cash offer to acquire Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. ("Take-Two") and declined to engage in the friendly negotiations we proposed.
Click to expand...

Sounds like T2 doesn't want to give it up.
 
FTC won't stop it because there is still plenty of competition. Can't stop it if it's not because of monopoly, and while EA is already huge, and Blizzard-Activision will also be large.... since both exist, amongst plenty of other developers, a monopoly cannot be claimed. And I doubt you'd see the FTC blocking company buyouts and merges for any other reason other than to prevent the emergence of a monopoly in the market.
 
It was really only a matter of time before the attempt was made, though whether it will come to fruition is another story entirely. Hopefully it does not.

KT
 
I'll just quote my post from console gaming.

Originally posted by: m0mentary
hypocrites, just recently they talked about wrongly destroying their old developers and now they want to buy another one? How about fixing one of the many development houses they already have.

Our all-cash proposal is a unique opportunity for Take-Two shareholders to realize immediate value at a substantial premium, while creating long-term value for EA shareholders. Take-Two's game designers would also benefit from EA's financial resources, stable, profit-focused management team, and strong global publishing capabilities.\ ... There can be no certainty that in the future EA or any other buyer would pay the same high premium we are offering today.
Click to expand...

fixed
Click to expand...
 
Well, Take Two is not much better than EA these days. Remember, these were the guys behind the Bioshock DRM fiasco. I wouldn't particularly care if they got bought out.
 
This is one of the reasons I stopped buying anything from EA.
I might miss out on a few games but I refuse to pay the salary of the suits at EA.
 
I played a bunch of good games pubbed by T2 last year. If EA is successfull I see that number dropping in the future.
 
FTC has nothing to do with mergers - its Bureau of Justice (Antitrust Division) that is supposed to evaluate those kind of deals. Anyway,

"Take-Two's Board of Directors has thoroughly reviewed EA's unsolicited proposal with the assistance of its independent financial and legal advisors and concluded that the proposal is inadequate in multiple respects and not in the best interests of Take-Two's stockholders."
 
All I have to say is pray for Valve and Steam. Yes you may hate Steam, etc. etc. but it keeps Valve's coffers flush and is their firewall against EA at present.
 
Multiplatform how? Like have Steam on the 360/PS3? Or do you mean cross platform multiplayer? Where PC orange boxers could play with 360 orange boxers?
 
Well take2 is refusing the offer till after GTA is released.
Seems to me they are just putting it off till the release in the hope of higher stock prices.
Its not a 'We don't like EA', its a 'We want more money'.
 
Originally posted by: Beev
Multiplatform how? Like have Steam on the 360/PS3? Or do you mean cross platform multiplayer? Where PC orange boxers could play with 360 orange boxers?
Click to expand...

Naw, just that it ran on linux, mac, etc as well. They'd be 3/4 of the way there if the source engine had an OpenGL renderer.

I say I think valve wishes they had gone that route because with live for windows MS was basically busting in on their territory. If they used OpenGL and the steam application was multiplatform then Microsoft would have a lot less doors to shut in their face.

Still, it looks like MS is kind of blowing in with windows live so I think steam isn't really in to much trouble.
 
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Well take2 is refusing the offer till after GTA is released.
Seems to me they are just putting it off till the release in the hope of higher stock prices.
Its not a 'We don't like EA', its a 'We want more money'.
Click to expand...

Ya, thats what they are saying on cnbc too. Pretty smart actually.

Still scares me though.
 
Originally posted by: Daverino
All I have to say is pray for Valve and Steam. Yes you may hate Steam, etc. etc. but it keeps Valve's coffers flush and is their firewall against EA at present.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure Gabe would sell even if EA offered an assload of money.
EA can't buy private companies as easily as they can public if the owners don't want to sell. There's no stock to buy for a hostile takeover. Valve is safe for as long as the owners want it to be.
 
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: ja1484

Not surprising.

Those GTA, BioShock, and Elder Scrolls franchises must look pretty tasty.
Click to expand...

They don't own Elder Scrolls...
Click to expand...


No, but they damn sure publish it, the latest iteration anyway, which means odds are fine for contractual extension.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top