• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

You know... I liked the new version of bbzzdd better

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Some of the v3 features were nice but speed & functionality > purdy

I HATED CLICKING 3 DAMN TIMES JUST TO VIEW THE DAMN FREAKIN' SOB PICS!!!!

yo mama is soooo poor I saw her kicking a cardboard box down the street, and when I asked her what she was doing, she said moving!!!


 
Like RH71 said there is a new version in the works with most of the features people miss in 2.x including user galleries, random gallery, NSFW tagging, and a bunch of other stuff. It's probably going to run much quicker than the current version and just stay out of your way while you use it. I am not putting in mouse hover previews, etc. That stuff just eats bandwidth and CPU.

Sorry some of you don't like the fact we had to roll back but it was in the best interests of everyone.

Oh, and 4.0 won't go live until a long public beta period where everyone signs off in the end to do the switchover. I would love to bury the 2.x today but that would only piss a lot of people off.
 
Originally posted by: dwell
Like RH71 said there is a new version in the works with most of the features people miss in 2.x including user galleries, random gallery, NSFW tagging, and a bunch of other stuff. It's probably going to run much quicker than the current version and just stay out of your way while you use it. I am not putting in mouse hover previews, etc. That stuff just eats bandwidth and CPU.

Sorry some of you don't like the fact we had to roll back but it was in the best interests of everyone.

Oh, and 4.0 won't go live until a long public beta period where everyone signs off in the end to do the switchover. I would love to bury the 2.x today but that would only piss a lot of people off.

Well I certainly don't hold it against you... the fact that we have a service at all is the benefit of your near sainthood level generosity. I'm just giving my opinion, in that I think alot of people are some whiney doo doo heads....

-Max
 
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: five40
I didn't mind the speed. What drove me nuts was the two clicks to see a picture. Yeah I know I could hold down shift but that's a pain in the a$$ as well.

so lemme get this straight holding down the shift key... is a pain in the ass?

Do you have a personal chef?

Yes and yes.
 
Originally posted by: five40
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: five40
I didn't mind the speed. What drove me nuts was the two clicks to see a picture. Yeah I know I could hold down shift but that's a pain in the a$$ as well.

so lemme get this straight holding down the shift key... is a pain in the ass?

Do you have a personal chef?

Yes and yes.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Some of the v3 features were nice but speed & functionality > purdy

I HATED CLICKING 3 DAMN TIMES JUST TO VIEW THE DAMN FREAKIN' SOB PICS!!!!

agreed 100%

it looked nicer, but it was way too slow and annoying to click twice to see a single pic. you had to wait for the ultra-slowness 2x as much that way as well.

and holding down the shift key just to view pictures is also retarded. you are browsing the web. that should be able to be done with one hand...especially in the NSFW section when your other hand might actually have purpose.
 
speed > features


edit: i :heart: the fact that the pics.bbzzdd guy is an ATOTer and listens to our wants! (j0o rock!)
 
Back
Top