"you can't have capitalism without racism."

Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
Can someone explain this to me?
Saw it written on a sign held by someone in a trayvon protest/march.

DSC8534impjpg-2059932_p9.jpg
 
Last edited:

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Anyone forming part of that protest march clearly wasn't very bright, so I wouldn't worry much about trying to understand the idiocy.

Race should play absolutely no role in capitalism.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
It's the progressive idea that blacks are genetically inferior to whites (and asians and hispanics, etc), and therefore any system based on freedom is racist because blacks will do worse than whites on an even playing field.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
The holder of the sign is a moron. There's your explanation.
 

Pia

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2008
1,563
0
0
You can't have humans without racism, so you also can't have X without racism where X is created by humans.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
Can someone explain this to me?
Saw it written on a sign held by someone in a trayvon protest/march.

Maybe the sign is saying we can not have captialism without exploiting certain social groups.

Up into the late 1800s, the US economy exploited slaves.

Up into the mid 1900s, the US economy exploited low class workers.

Current, we exploit cheap overseas labor.

Is exploitation a form of racism?

Do we make excuses why its ok for chinese workers to get paid so little? Did slave owners in the 1800s make excuses why its ok to own slaves?
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Maybe the sign is saying we can not have captialism without exploiting certain social groups.

Up into the late 1800s, the US economy exploited slaves.

Up into the mid 1900s, the US economy exploited low class workers.

Current, we exploit cheap overseas labor.

Is exploitation a form of racism?

Do we make excuses why its ok for chinese workers to get paid so little? Did slave owners in the 1800s make excuses why its ok to own slaves?

That's not capitalism, that's utilitarianism.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
It's the progressive idea that blacks are genetically inferior to whites (and asians and hispanics, etc), and therefore any system based on freedom is racist because blacks will do worse than whites on an even playing field.

I'm not progressive however you have to temper your level playing field from a similar starting point. Its a good argument that because of slavery and lack of civil rights until the 60s black peopel did not have an even starting point and affirmative action was to level that a bit.

We may be at a tiem where we are doign more harm that good with affirmative action.

But to argue they think they are genetically inferior is about as retarded as you can get.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
I'm not progressive however you have to temper your level playing field from a similar starting point. Its a good argument that because of slavery and lack of civil rights until the 60s black peopel did not have an even starting point and affirmative action was to level that a bit.

We may be at a tiem where we are doign more harm that good with affirmative action.

But to argue they think they are genetically inferior is about as retarded as you can get.

I'm not making that argument, far from it. The fact that there are many black people in this country that refuse to be victims (i.e. liberals), as well as black people in every other 1st world country that do just fine puts the obvious lie to that notion. I was merely pointing out the logical consequence of the statement "you can't have captialism without racism" infers that black people are genetically inferior.

As for even starting point, that is baloney. Immigrants come to this country with absolutely nothing, often having been effective slaves themselves in their home countries and become highly prosperous. You can't blame a 75% illegitimacy rate on the fact that your great great great great grandfather was a slave.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
I'm not making that argument, far from it. The fact that there are many black people in this country that refuse to be victims (i.e. liberals), as well as black people in every other 1st world country that do just fine puts the obvious lie to that notion. I was merely pointing out the logical consequence of the statement "you can't have captialism without racism" infers that black people are genetically inferior.

As for even starting point, that is baloney. Immigrants come to this country with absolutely nothing, often having been effective slaves themselves in their home countries and become highly prosperous. You can't blame a 75% illegitimacy rate on the fact that your great great great great grandfather was a slave.

what you said was "It's the progressive idea that blacks are genetically inferior to whites "

Unfounded bullshit statement. You dont have to agree that affirmative action was to level the starting point, but thats exactly what it was for.

It applies to immigrants too not just black people.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
It's the progressive idea that blacks are genetically inferior to whites (and asians and hispanics, etc), and therefore any system based on freedom is racist because blacks will do worse than whites on an even playing field.

95% of what's said here about the left is wrong or lies, I can't remember the other 5%.

Perverse, ignorant idiocy. You don't snap your fingers and have an even playing field.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
Not sure if serious. If you have freedom you can make money.

It takes money to lobby congress to make or change laws to favor you.

So I agree its not that you dont have freedom its that you have less of it without money.
 
Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
Anyone forming part of that protest march clearly wasn't very bright, so I wouldn't worry much about trying to understand the idiocy.

Race should play absolutely no role in capitalism.

ok, i was wondering how the two tied together, and figured someone smarter than me knew.

given how much media attention this would get, don't you think they would ask someone to vet the signs they hold before randomly printing gibberish on them?
 

Iron Wolf

Member
Jul 27, 2010
185
0
0
95% of what's said here about the left is wrong or lies, I can't remember the other 5%.

Perverse, ignorant idiocy. You don't snap your fingers and have an even playing field.

An interesting idea, since this whole forum is controlled by lefties.

And we've been "snapping our fingers" for 50 years now. How long is it supposed to take?