Econo car as defined by price, sure. It's a phrase commonly applied to neons to describe quality but I don't think it applies to the scion in that sense. Where there are a few "amenities" the tsx has that the TC does not have available, it's not much beyond leather seats, xenon lights, and a stability control system.
Econo car as defined by price, sure. It's a phrase commonly applied to neons to describe quality but I don't think it applies to the scion in that sense. Where there are a few "amenities" the tsx has that the TC does not have available, it's not much beyond leather seats, xenon lights, and a stability control system.
Bah, you could mix and match statistics from every website in the world to support your post and you'd still find the two cars at a virtual dead heat. Fact remains for 28K it's a slow car.
OS
Lifer
- Oct 11, 1999
- 15,581
- 1
- 76
Holy sh*t you're even dumber than I thought. Mix and match?? It's from the same damn tester. And if you actually knew dick about cars, you'd see that the difference in trap speed is 3 mph, which means the TSX is pulling away cleanly from your precious TC after the 1/4 mark.
What I meant was I pulled info from another website showing the tC was faster. You pulled from another site showing the TSX was faster. Great. The numbers are statistically insignificant, even by the numbers you pulled. You've got to be retarded not to know this.
I drove an Altima SE-R and the an Accord V6 right after. The Accord's engine doesn't have the feeling of immediate power like the VQ, so it was rather unsatisfying although it is not slow after the RPMs climb. I imagine the TSX would feel even more anemic.
OS
Lifer
- Oct 11, 1999
- 15,581
- 1
- 76
First it's "half second faster" and now it's a "dead heat" and "statistically insignificant". Who's retarded again? You really mean you're the one who's retarded right? I mean you already f*cked up once.
"Yes officer I was smoking crack. Oh wait, I mean no officer I wasn't smoking crack."
Maybe you should flush all that sh*t out of your nose before you make another post. That way you won't be as confused as f*ck.
The tC is cheap looking, period. The TSX is at least a little stylish.
WTF is going on with the hood on the tC, that's all I want to know.
tC: Curb Weight, lbs. 2905
TSX: Curb Weight, lbs. 3230
And the saddest part is that the tC can't pull away when it's 325 pounds lighter than the TSX.
It's got nearly 40 less horsepower. Similar amount less of torque. What do you expect?
Wow, you are just a bitter little prick aren't you. Can't admit your stupidity.
Yeah, the info I posted showed it to be a half second faster. If you want to use the data you provided, it's what, .2 seconds slower? Average those, and the tC still comes out ahead. Statistically, those numbers don't mean much as cars will vary from one sample to another. But if you wan't to be a stickler, hey, looks like the tC is a winner if you average our data.
Why don't you take a nap and see if you wake up a bit less cranky than a 2 year old.
AgaBoogaBoo
Lifer
- Feb 16, 2003
- 26,108
- 5
- 81
it doesn't matter, these cars aren't meant to handle the best on a track or be the fastest on the 1/4 mile
Says who? Mr I Drive To Work and Back Home everyday? So tell me where exactly would you want to use your RWD? At the parking lot? And guess what? If you were looking for a car to have that kind of fun with on a racetrack a TSX is the wrong fscking car to do it in. :roll:
Again, compared to it's competitors - IS300, entry level Beamers - it's around the same speed. It's not meant to be a frickin G35 or a TL. It's meant to be a refined entry level cruiser. TSX's can be had for about $25K. This retarded argument about faster cars for cheaper is ridiculous. Why don't you throw in a SRT-4, or a 300hp 05 Mustang GT, or a AWD turbo'ed WRx, or any one of a number of other cars I can mention cheaper than a TSX (MSRP) but faster?
I like the tC - I like it as much as a 3. But I will never drive a compact car. I hate small cars. Toyota makes great cars but the Scion line in general has to have had some corners cut. (The xA and xB have so-so to bad initial reliability ratings)
Pretty original idea there. I bet you've got plenty of friends down in Jasper Texas don't ya? Lamer.
Taking or giving, still makes you a fudgepacker. It's all the same, right?
I don't "love my tC so much". There are plenty of faults with it. Never denied that. I was simply following the lead of another poster by pointing out the TSX was overpriced for the money. I wasn't saying my car was competition to car shoppers. Learn to fvsking read nitwit.
OS
Lifer
- Oct 11, 1999
- 15,581
- 1
- 76
Originally posted by: Lucky
Taking or giving, still makes you a fudgepacker. It's all the same, right?
Sh*t, were you molested by a TSX driver or something?
First it was my car is faster. Then, my car isn't faster. Then, it's something in between.
"yes officer, I was smoking crack, but did not inhale"
Apparently you're full of sh*t for someone to be packing your fudge.
is a VERY nice car inside, but for some reason still just lacks something.... it's a tad boring
IS300 is better
IS300 is better
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter