Yet another GTX Titan thread...

Stg-Flame

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2007
3,660
602
126
Given my specs below, how would a Titan impact my performance on gaming for now as well as acting as a sound investment for a GPU to tide me over a few years?

My current hardware can max games like Borderlands 2, but maxing Farcry 3 was dropping me down to 20-30FPS and I have to completely turn off Tessellation and SSAA for Metro: Last Light to play the game (everything else is maxed and with SSAA + Tessellation my FPS drops from 60 to about 6).

Also, given there are five different models of Titans, is it worth an extra $200 for the Hydro Copper edition? I was planning on upgrading my dual 670s to 690s in the future anyways, but seeing the benchmarks of the Titan in comparison to the 690, I'm leaning towards a Titan instead.

Lastly, my PC is entirely air-cooled and I live in the desert, so my fans (and entire case) is covered in dust within a week of cleaning it (2 200mm + 2 180mm fans), so I am a little worried about ventilation if I were to toss a Titan in there.

Any information on this is greatly appreciated.
 

Lepton87

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2009
2,544
9
81
If you really want an upgrade you need at least two. One does not make sense in your case at all. You won't get better performance, unless SLI isn't working.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Most of the time a single Titan will perform worse than your 670 SLI setup. Don't ever judge your system's performance by FC3. It's a bugged mess and simply runs like crap.
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
what resolution are you playing at that 670 sli cant max those games out and play smooth?
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
+1. Ditto for Metro 2033 with DX11 enabled
DX11 is not bugged at all in Metro 2033. in fact it runs just as good or better in DX11 even with tessellation on than it does in DX10. you must be only thinking of running advanced dof.
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,329
126
Now is probably the worst time to consider Titan with the GTX780 coming out shortly. The 780 will be 80-85% of Titan's performance for $650, maybe $700. Significantly less cost for slightly less performance.
 

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,380
448
126
Now is probably the worst time to consider Titan with the GTX780 coming out shortly. The 780 will be 80-85% of Titan's performance for $650, maybe $700. Significantly less cost for slightly less performance.

Yep, basically wait and get 2 x GTX 780s, unless you want to spend the extra $500 for 10% more performance with 2 x Titans.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Now is probably the worst time to consider Titan with the GTX780 coming out shortly. The 780 will be 80-85% of Titan's performance for $650, maybe $700. Significantly less cost for slightly less performance.

20% less performance and less vram is still substantial IMO. I doubt it will cost less than $700. In the OPs case, a single Titan is roughly almost as fast as 670 SLI so it doesn't make sense to switch over and in his case, dual 780 might be a better deal as suggested by everyone else. If you got the money though, dual (or triple) Titan can't be beat.
 

Black Octagon

Golden Member
Dec 10, 2012
1,410
2
81
DX11 is not bugged at all in Metro 2033. in fact it runs just as good or better in DX11 even with tessellation on than it does in DX10. you must be only thinking of running advanced dof.

I always got much better fps (on AMD) by playing at DX10 rather than DX11.
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
You would need to be brain dead to pick a Titan over 2 780 GTX or even 2 760ti's.

Some people have a fear of SLI or CF but they work perfectly for me.
 

NIGELG

Senior member
Nov 4, 2009
852
31
91
Your current setup is way better than Titan unless you have SLI issues and you want to go single card.
 

lavaheadache

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2005
6,893
14
81
You guys seem to overlook that some of us HATE multi gpu. When that is a concern Titan is really the only answer if you need/want the best you can get.
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
You guys seem to overlook that some of us HATE multi gpu. When that is a concern Titan is really the only answer if you need/want the best you can get.

No we just ignore the ramblings of people who hate SLI for no other reason than you hate SLI.

No single GPU offers enough performance to play at 1440p or even 1200p on some games. Unless you turn down the settings.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
But he'd have to go multi gpu to get any gains if 670 SLI works in the games he's playing.
 

lavaheadache

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2005
6,893
14
81
No we just ignore the ramblings of people who hate SLI for no other reason than you hate SLI.

No single GPU offers enough performance to play at 1440p or even 1200p on some games. Unless you turn down the settings.

as if I have no experience with multi gpu...

:whiste:
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,348
642
121
You guys seem to overlook that some of us HATE multi gpu. When that is a concern Titan is really the only answer if you need/want the best you can get.

"Given my specs below, how would a Titan impact my performance on gaming for now as well as acting as a sound investment for a GPU to tide me over a few years?"

He asked how Titan would affect his gaming performance. That's the question. The answer is it will negatively affect him. You're now adding your own points in JUST to argue.
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
"Given my specs below, how would a Titan impact my performance on gaming for now as well as acting as a sound investment for a GPU to tide me over a few years?"

He asked how Titan would affect his gaming performance. That's the question. The answer is it will negatively affect him. You're now adding your own points in JUST to argue.

The only thing the Titan will do for him is make his numbers go down.

His FPS

His Bank balance

His P***** length
 

DooKey

Golden Member
Nov 9, 2005
1,811
458
136
If you were planning on going to dual 690 in the future then going dual Titan might be the way to go. SLI scaling is much better than quad-SLI scaling. In the long run you'd probably be happier with the SLI Titan's. So far as water cooling goes it might be better to stick with the stock Titan since it is a really good air cooler and it will save you some money.
 

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,188
2
76
With your current setup doing anything other than waiting for 20nm GPU's at the end of the year/early next year is a complete waste of money. Even the rumored gtx780 is a complete waste of money in your situation.
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,676
3,529
136
Most of the time a single Titan will perform worse than your 670 SLI setup. Don't ever judge your system's performance by FC3. It's a bugged mess and simply runs like crap.

Far Cry 3 runs great for me. 60 buttery smooth frames per second.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
OP - As others have mentioned the Titan wouldn't gain anything for you except the rare cases when SLI doesn't work all that well. However, if you do decide to go with a Titan, the hydro copper edition is for watercooling only.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,348
642
121
Far Cry 3 runs great for me. 60 buttery smooth frames per second.

Just to clarify this thread, we're talking about spending upwards of 1k+, because FC3 (A game in which someone is using tri SLI Titan to play), and Tessellation and SSAA on Metro: Last Light, aren't capable of working?

Ya'll must be serious because I'd never spend over 1000 dollars to play just two games.... Hell, not even play two games, but two enable one or two more settings on two games. Especially when new consoles are coming out and developers will most likely start to really push the graphics envelope and NV/AMD will, instead of releasing refreshes, actually release brand new architectures.

But I guess some of you guys have a lot more money to spend on gaming and put it at a lot higher of a priority than I do. To me though, what you listed, couldn't possibly warrant that type of expenditure for such a small increase in performance. I'd wait for new architectures that are a year away rather than spend 1k+ on GFX cards that will no doubt look terrible compared to what comes around in 2014.

Then again, it probably would have helped if you'd answered/specfied what resolution was your target/bear minimum, to play at....