If you wish to pretend that I believe you'd be fine with your income if it suddenly became the minimum wage, I will try to refrain from pointing and laughing. You may have to remind me from time to time though.
I would not argue that raising the minimum wage will cause an "incredible" wave of inflation. I think raising the minimum wage roughly in line with inflation is smart policy; it will inevitably cause some inflation, but inflation isn't the worst thing possible and I think it likely that for reasonable increases, a little inflation pain is a reasonable price to pay to avoid inflation from other causes defeating the purpose of the minimum wage.
I will argue that raising the minimum wage to $15/hour will cause an "incredible" wave of inflation. To believe otherwise requires believing that at least a third of the nation can suddenly find themselves earning minimum wage and be fine with that.
And sorry, I cannot see why rampant inflation and societal disruption could ever be seen as a good thing. But assuming you do, why aim at library technician territory? Why should an aerospace engineer or aerospace operations technician ($30/hour) earn more than a hamburger engineer or French fry technician? Surely flipping hamburgers is harder work, and it's not like just anyone is capable of doing it. (Some of those P.O.S. terminals don't even have pictures of the menu items; I bet aerospace engineer don't have to operate equipment without pictures.) Why not aim for CEO parity? Think how much consuming we could do, how much social justice we'd have, how much misery eradication we'd accomplish, if we all earned at least $82.50. Hey, if you're gonna be a bear, be a grizzly, and it's not like wages are set by anything more than dumb luck and greed anyway.
Just for reference, the BLS 2013 report has the national median wage as $16.87 for all occupations.
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000