Originally posted by: ManSnake
67 hostages are dead.
grrrrr, damn cowards! This whole story angers me....But he said: "Two of the terrorists escaped and we are combing the territory. They are hiding themselves in houses."
Ditto, those assholes didn't deserve negotiations - it just sucks that the people being held were just going to see a friggin movie, and 67 of them end up losing their lives...I applaud the russians though to not give in under this kind of thing
Originally posted by: MadRat
I believe it was classical theater, not movie theater. Someone find out!
The audience had arrived at the theatre to see "Nord Ost," a popular production of a classic Russian musical
67 hostages are dead.
Originally posted by: ManSnake
67 hostages are dead.
That argument could be used by people from the middle east who orcestrated the 9/11 attacks against your country. So either you're against terrorism as a means of change or for it. Apparently you're the latter. You said you do not agree with what they did by your sympathetic tone is obvious to me and the rest of the people here.Originally posted by: Desslok
Who are the real scum here? The Checens or the Soviets? Ok lets tally the score up here.
Who invade whom first and made them live in a state where they were cruely repressed for more than 50 years.
Who dumped tons of toxic material in the others land because they were to worried about not keeping up with the West in the arms race instead of disposing of it in the proper manner.
Do I agree with what the Rebel's did? NO. They should have gone after a military target. On the other hand payback is a bit#h and the Soviets have a ton coming their way.
Like I said, the middle east could be using this same argument for the 9/11 attacks. Pick a side and stick with it.On the other hand payback is a bit#h and the Soviets have a ton coming their way.
Originally posted by: Desslok
Now shall we see how his analogy about dumping is wrong? Have you seen the area in Nevada where they are going to dump? Well I have and you could seriously set off a tactical nuke and not hurt anyone with the blast. So how is dumping sealed waste there going to harm anyone? Now let see how the Russians/Soviets handle the same matter. They turned a majority of the Black Sea and pretty much all their military sites into a dead zones.
Originally posted by: Desslok
Who are the real scum here? The Checens or the Soviets? Ok lets tally the score up here.
Who invade whom first and made them live in a state where they were cruely repressed for more than 50 years.
Who dumped tons of toxic material in the others land because they were to worried about not keeping up with the West in the arms race instead of disposing of it in the proper manner.
Do I agree with what the Rebel's did? NO. They should have gone after a military target. On the other hand payback is a bit#h and the Soviets have a ton coming their way.
Originally posted by: vladgur
I dont know if you guys have noticed that this situation got littlle to no coverage on CNN and when they did, they refered to the the Chechen terrorists as rebels, Chechen rebels. I wonder how often do you hear word Taliban rebel or palestinian suicide rebel on CNN...
Originally posted by: Mandrill
Gopunk: We were considered rebels to the British about 225 years back![]()