I remember that you initially had him in the "guilty" column, but as facts came out you changed your mind. That's why I never brought you up specifically as one of those from the other thread. You knew you had missed on the initial assessment and changed as facts came out.
You mention the press. Well, they had him tried in advance, and they found themselves caught in an awkward situation, not being able to use the tried and true bad cop line. Some even had to backpedal, bringing up his "heroism" since they clearly couldn't railroad this guy.
The assumption was "White Cop Bad" "Black Prof Good"
In a way that's not only insulting to the police, but the black community. We hear about black history, and having the White Man's Burden, we make excuses for the poor black things who aren't yet able to tell right from wrong.
No matter how intelligent, hardworking or diligent they may be, they are after all not able to tell right from wrong sometimes.
That is something brought home by inner city blacks I worked with at that time. I mean blacks who live in shit and have real race problems. Not this dickhead who lived a gilt life by comparison.
They were pissed off that the cop was getting beat up on, and the prof was the victim. They maintained they weren't children who have to cry "whitey" when things don't go their way.
I remember one young man put it quite well "This fucker (the prof) should have gotten the shit beat out of him. He's using stupid white people. He's not one of us because we don't do stupid shit and say that you are holding us down. We don't need a white man to come to our defense."
Well it's not quite precise, because he used the more colorful words more often.
Nevertheless, there are people who are proud and black, but because of what they do, not because they are black. Now that I can respect.