Originally posted by: przero
Resurrection?
I believe it, and that is the pillar holding up my faith. If Jesus was never raised from death and Hell, my faith would be nothing, it would be meaningless.
Originally posted by: przero
Resurrection?
Originally posted by: Sysadmin
YAAAAAAAAAWN
Sysadmin
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: ThePresence
To be exact the name is Yehoshua with an "H" or a "Hey" in Hebrew. That is translated in English as Joshua. Jesus's name as it appears in the Talmud is Yeshu.Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Just a minor point, Y'shua is Hebrew for Joshua, Yeshu is Hebrew for Jesus.Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: Metalloid
Hebrews 8:10-13
10 This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time, declares the Lord.
I will put my laws in their minds
and write them on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
11 No longer will a man teach his neighbor,
or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,'
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest.
12 For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."
13 By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
Jesus did make the OT law obsolete, and he said that he will put the new law on the people's hearts and minds. He said that he is the only way to heaven, because he died for us.
Also, the Jews did not believe that Jesus was really God.
Neener neener
But no, the Jews (by religion) did not, and do not, believe that Y'shua (Jesus) is their promised Messiah (regardless that he fulfills all of over 400 prophecies concerning the Messiah...). No joke. Didn't miss a single one.
The Hebrew word you're referring to is Y'shua/Yeshua which means "Salvation". If anyone tells you otherwise they're quite simply wrong. The angel Gabriel told Mary to name her son "Salvation, for he shall save his people". The Hebrew word for salvation is Y'shua/Yeshua.
Sorry, the Hebrew word for salvation is Yeshua. You can go over the whole Joshua debate all you like, you're just arguing about transliterations of the original word. I'll say it again: the angel Gabriel told Mary to name her son "Salvation, for he shall save his people."
Sir, I attended Rabbinical Seminary for 8 years, and I lived in Israel, speak fluent Hebrew, I'm quite sure I know what the word is. I'm not arguing about transliteration at all. In fact I'm not even arguing.
SALVATION = YESHUA
JOSHUA = YEHOSHUA.
JESUS = YESHU
What I said before about Y'shua being Joshua, I thought the guy was making the mistake that is usally made. People call Joshua Yeshua, but it's a corruption of the original word. It's what happens when you say YEHOSHUA quickly, you get YESHUA. There is a Hebrew word YESHUA and it means salvation.
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Getting back to the original topic, I think that these verses are instructive regarding the law:
When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?
"We who are Jews by birth and not 'Gentile sinners' know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified.
"If, while we seek to be justified in Christ, it becomes evident that we ourselves are sinners, does that mean that Christ promotes sin? Absolutely not! If I rebuild what I destroyed, I prove that I am a lawbreaker. For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God. I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!"
(Galatians 2:14-21)
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
So let me get this straight... You agree that the Hebrew word for salvation is, in fact, Yeshua.
What, then, are you arguing about?
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Can you explain what your point is? I'm not sure I'm following.
Can you give me examples of Jewish laws that Christians should be following but aren't?
Do you want Christians to follow Jewish customs? If so, that's what Paul is agruing against.
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: Stefan
How exactly did Jesus come to believe that he was the son of God? was he told this from the very beginning of his life? starting at age 5? did he just think he was the son of God from the very beginning?
Other than the miricals he performed be healing people and whatnot (which could just easily be a subjective thing where the people thought they were better because he said he would make them better), how is someone supposed to believe that Jesus didn't just suffer from schizophrenia? Or some other condition that say that he was just delusional?
We're not told when He knew he was Son of God, but we do know that He was exceptional in His youth, discussing Judaism's particulars with temple elders when His family visited Jerusalem. Nevertheless, it is irrelevant to this discussion. There are things we don't need to know. There is a term for what you just did, though. It's called ad hominem, and it's a fallacy of logic.
His healings are hardly acts of suggestive reasoning. Allowing a man who had been a cripple for 38 years to walk is one very impressive feat of suggestive reasoning, especially since all was said was "Get up and walk" (Text). Or, the account of the Roman officer who had faith to simply ask Jesus to heal his servant, who was at home - that servant was made better from his deathbed without Jesus even being there (Text).
Jesus' behavior was far from delusional and schizophrenic. If it was, why would the temple elders be so concerned with a crazy man?