YAMcDFT: Hate Crime in Baltimore?

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
I wish I knew what you looked like, I always picture you as some skinny guy trying to be the next black gangsta, but then you make posts like these and I really wonder.

Throw up one of your pics so we understand.

lol
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
I wish I knew what you looked like, I always picture you as some skinny guy trying to be the next black gangsta, but then you make posts like these and I really wonder.

Throw up one of your pics so we understand.

I am 5'10 190lbs. I work in Philly, I know and have met face to face with quite a few folks who are or used to be here. You work or live around here send me a PM and we can meet face to face. I don't drink though and I am not huge Italian food guy either.

I just don't like all the racist bullshit against blacks I have read here for years.

We are not animals, Savages, Monkeys, or Apes.
Despite what Chris Rock said in jest, we are not seperated into two groups of blacks and n!ggers.
We are not stupid or unable to learn despite how many times I have seen the Bell Curve theory posted here.
We don't hunt whites in packs. Some of us actually have married and live quite happy with the opposite race.
We don't all steal.
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have done more good than harm. But they are not our leaders and don't speak for all black people.
We do graduate from college even from Ivy league schools.
AA only mostly applys to government jobs and those who work with government mostly. So if a black person has a job sitting next to you and your business is not in the preceding statement 9 times out of 10 he fucking earned it.

This is just a sample of the thinking that is put forth here. I am not a politcally correct person, but it has become nauseating. And I don't care if they don't like me because I am loud mouthed, bleep them. If anyone ever read about black people and used what is posted here as a resource, they would shoot us on sight. The internet is full of boards where you can talk down and name call black people 24/7. Why can't these bastards go there?
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
lol, these threads always degrade over time, let me help...

1284764638-drama-queen.jpg


:awe:
 
May 11, 2008
22,599
1,473
126
I think him cheering, egging them on implicates him. Sad state of affairs when the only person who stepped in to help was an old white lady. Thankfully in KY lethal force is justifiable in defense of a third party. Those two needed to be shot. Stomping somebody's head is trying to kill them, her life was in immediate danger.


Normally i do not agree with you but with this. With this i would have jumped in and if i by accident had to hurt someone seriously, then that is just the way it is. Nobody helped there to separate them. Jump in and separate is the duty of everybody. When reason fails in the individual, others must help to correct and restore reason within that individual.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
I am 5'10 190lbs. I work in Philly, I know and have met face to face with quite a few folks who are or used to be here. You work or live around here send me a PM and we can meet face to face. I don't drink though and I am not huge Italian food guy either.

I just don't like all the racist bullshit against blacks I have read here for years.

We are not animals, Savages, Monkeys, or Apes.
Despite what Chris Rock said in jest, we are not seperated into two groups of blacks and n!ggers.
We are not stupid or unable to learn despite how many times I have seen the Bell Curve theory posted here.
We don't hunt whites in packs. Some of us actually have married and live quite happy with the opposite race.
We don't all steal.
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have done more good than harm. But they are not our leaders and don't speak for all black people.
We do graduate from college even from Ivy league schools.
AA only mostly applys to government jobs and those who work with government mostly. So if a black person has a job sitting next to you and your business is not in the preceding statement 9 times out of 10 he fucking earned it.

This is just a sample of the thinking that is put forth here. I am not a politcally correct person, but it has become nauseating. And I don't care if they don't like me because I am loud mouthed, bleep them. If anyone ever read about black people and used what is posted here as a resource, they would shoot us on sight. The internet is full of boards where you can talk down and name call black people 24/7. Why can't these bastards go there?
you have your say, but don't let anyone else have one?

probably because of years of hearing actual racist comments you are sensitive to anything and assume it is derogatory. calling the women in this thread "animals" who senselessly beat up a person is not RACIST! they are animals! it has nothing to do with their skin color. it has to do with their actions.

give the moderators credit here. they are good at nipping and stamping out anything/anyone who posts racist material. you may have seen it over the years here, but it isn't let go like it would be on "other" boards. You agree?

you said OJ is innocent? wow. :\
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,656
6,532
126
LOL @ ATOT NOW SAYING ANIMAL IS THE NEW RACIST WORD FOR BLACK PEOPLE LOL.

seriously, that is fucking pathetic that people would even THINK that way.

this is almost as bad as the black guy on Survivor being called crazy by a white guy (because he is batshit crazy) and the black dude then says that crazy is the white mans code word for n*****. truly pathetic that people think this way.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
you have your say, but don't let anyone else have one?

probably because of years of hearing actual racist comments you are sensitive to anything and assume it is derogatory. calling the women in this thread "animals" who senselessly beat up a person is not RACIST! they are animals! it has nothing to do with their skin color. it has to do with their actions.

give the moderators credit here. they are good at nipping and stamping out anything/anyone who posts racist material. you may have seen it over the years here, but it isn't let go like it would be on "other" boards. You agree?

you said OJ is innocent? wow. :\


My post you quoted, that is the say of so many here. If you posted an animal reference I know it would be because you are pissed. But these other ones, they regularly make it a point to use language to deingrate blacks with name calling regardless. How can you refer to these two black girls as animals, but totally overlook the group of whites who recently violently murdered that boy?

As for the mods and the job they do, they have to judge themselves. Clear violations they handle promptly and always have. But these slick overt things they don't always. This thread was made with the title of accusing these black girls of attacking this woman based on her color. There is not one drop or shred of evidence that was true. But because that is the heart cry of many of these clowns, it gets posted and accepted.

My question is, why is only the crimes of blacks posted 9 to 1 or 8 to 2 over other races? And most of the time its black on white violence. And that even doesn't bother me. But then it becomes, the comments with animal or sub human references. Then it moves to well this is the way "they" act. The comments I knew before even clicked on the link what race they were. Like threads of this nature are posted about about all races, yeah right.

I have always found Anandtech and the forums a great resource. You can learn a lot of stuff here. But I for one have gotten to the point with the black stuff maybe it ain't worth posting here anymore. I used to recommend people who would ask about computer stuff to search the forums here. But not anymore. You don't have to be politically correct, but the outright racial shit is unbecoming and unneccessary.

As far as OJ is concerned, so many are quick to hold up the law, but when that same law found him innocent, then the laws were bad. The correct line I should have posted was he was found innocent. It has worked for so many other people, why not him?
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
LOL @ ATOT NOW SAYING ANIMAL IS THE NEW RACIST WORD FOR BLACK PEOPLE LOL.

seriously, that is fucking pathetic that people would even THINK that way.

this is almost as bad as the black guy on Survivor being called crazy by a white guy (because he is batshit crazy) and the black dude then says that crazy is the white mans code word for n*****. truly pathetic that people think this way.

This thread is just fucking pathetic.
It is the epitome of the hyper-sensitive society we live in.

People that beat on other people are savages. They are animals. They are scum of the earth. I don't care what color, creed, or race they are. I will use those words to describe them.

If we are not "allowed" to use such words. please tell me exactly WHAT words would be fitting and socially acceptable. I'm dying to know.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
My post you quoted, that is the say of so many here. If you posted an animal reference I know it would be because you are pissed. But these other ones, they regularly make it a point to use language to deingrate blacks with name calling regardless. How can you refer to these two black girls as animals, but totally overlook the group of whites who recently violently murdered that boy?

As for the mods and the job they do, they have to judge themselves. Clear violations they handle promptly and always have. But these slick overt things they don't always. This thread was made with the title of accusing these black girls of attacking this woman based on her color. There is not one drop or shred of evidence that was true. But because that is the heart cry of many of these clowns, it gets posted and accepted.
No. No. No.
I interpreted the "Hate Crime in Baltimore" as meaning a hate crime against a transsexual. Not because the victim was white.
All the articles I have read on it state there is a possibility this could be charged as a hate crime "based on gender identity."

My question is, why is only the crimes of blacks posted 9 to 1 or 8 to 2 over other races? And most of the time its black on white violence. And that even doesn't bother me. But then it becomes, the comments with animal or sub human references. Then it moves to well this is the way "they" act. The comments I knew before even clicked on the link what race they were. Like threads of this nature are posted about about all races, yeah right.

I have always found Anandtech and the forums a great resource. You can learn a lot of stuff here. But I for one have gotten to the point with the black stuff maybe it ain't worth posting here anymore. I used to recommend people who would ask about computer stuff to search the forums here. But not anymore. You don't have to be politically correct, but the outright racial shit is unbecoming and unneccessary.
Again, I don't think you have an out of control racist messageboard on your hands here. It's not perfect, but there's not a big problem.

You can learn a lot of stuff here. You can ask questions and get some great answers from some great people. Good luck finding a board this active that is this on the up and up. We will always have a few bad apples here, but they don't go unnoticed. They are called on their idiot posts by the mods or the members. We self police ourselves very well here too I think. I believe you are over board on your accusations or I just am not seeing it the way you are. I won't say I have never seen racist remarks here, and I call people on them just the same, but calling someone an "animal" or "sub human" is not limited to one race, and never will be.

I have said this before... If this thread contained a video of two white girls beating on another girl or, a transsexual in this case, I still would have called them animals, thugs, pieces of shit. Further, go ahead and post a story of white on black crime like you see in the video in the op, and see what reaction you get here. It won't be what you are professing.

As far as OJ is concerned, so many are quick to hold up the law, but when that same law found him innocent, then the laws were bad. The correct line I should have posted was he was found innocent. It has worked for so many other people, why not him?
A great defense team and a jury who bought OJ's acting job got him the free pass. It wasn't because he was innocent. It was because the justice system in this country does fail at times.

Haven't you read this book? Even OJ admits to it. ;)

if-i-did-it.jpg
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
I just don't like all the racist bullshit against blacks I have read here for years.

We are not animals, Savages, Monkeys, or Apes.
Despite what Chris Rock said in jest, we are not seperated into two groups of blacks and n!ggers.
We are not stupid or unable to learn despite how many times I have seen the Bell Curve theory posted here.
We don't hunt whites in packs. Some of us actually have married and live quite happy with the opposite race.
We don't all steal.
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have done more good than harm. But they are not our leaders and don't speak for all black people.
We do graduate from college even from Ivy league schools.
AA only mostly applys to government jobs and those who work with government mostly. So if a black person has a job sitting next to you and your business is not in the preceding statement 9 times out of 10 he fucking earned it.

This is just a sample of the thinking that is put forth here. I am not a politcally correct person, but it has become nauseating. And I don't care if they don't like me because I am loud mouthed, bleep them. If anyone ever read about black people and used what is posted here as a resource, they would shoot us on sight. The internet is full of boards where you can talk down and name call black people 24/7. Why can't these bastards go there?

I agree with everything you said except the bit about Al Sharpton. He is a loathsome race-baiting poverty pimp.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
No. No. No.
I interpreted the "Hate Crime in Baltimore" as meaning a hate crime against a transsexual. Not because the victim was white.
All the articles I have read on it state there is a possibility this could be charged as a hate crime "based on gender identity."

The OP changed the thread title when it became apparent that it was not racially-motivated. I believe the original thread title began "possibly racially motivated ____ ?" (I forget the rest).

And of course the first pages are filled with people complaining that it won't be treated as a hate crime because the victim is white and the criminals are black, etc. It's funny, because ATers always complain that blacks are so quick to claim racism, then they do the same thing.
 
Last edited:

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
The OP changed the thread title when it became apparent that it was not racially-motivated. I believe the original thread title began "possibly racially motivated ____ ?" (I forget the rest).

And of course the first pages are filled with people complaining that it won't be treated as a hate crime because the victim is white and the criminals are black, etc. It's funny, because ATers always complain that blacks are so quick to claim racism, then they do the same thing.
He must've changed the title quickly because I don't see a tagline showing he edited it.
 
Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
My question is, why is only the crimes of blacks posted 9 to 1 or 8 to 2 over other races? And most of the time its black on white violence.

why do blacks make up 35% of those incarcerated, but are only 10% of the US population?


let me guess. the law is racist as well.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
thread title edits won't show an EDITED BY timestamp in the post.
didn't know that....

they should.

also, shouldn't be allowed to edit title after set amount of time has passed or after someone has posted a response.

for one, someone could screw with those who have posted in the thread and make it look like their responses aren't as originally intended.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
As far as OJ is concerned, so many are quick to hold up the law, but when that same law found him innocent, then the laws were bad. The correct line I should have posted was he was found innocent. It has worked for so many other people, why not him?

Juries do not find defendants innocent, they find them "not guilty". It may seem like splitting hairs but there is a world of difference. It means the evidence as presented in court was not sufficient for them to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Let me ask you this since you like to deal with everything in terms of race, there were some famous cases of white defendants being found "not guilty" in murdering blacks by juries in Mississippi in the 1950's. Do you believe those defendants are innocent because they were found "not guilty" by a jury?
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Juries do not find defendants innocent, they find them "not guilty". It may seem like splitting hairs but there is a world of difference. It means the evidence as presented in court was not sufficient for them to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Let me ask you this since you like to deal with everything in terms of race, there were some famous cases of white defendants being found "not guilty" in murdering blacks by juries in Mississippi in the 1950's. Do you believe those defendants are innocent because they were found "not guilty" by a jury?

Hmm not quite the same thing. All those jurys were white judging white defendants. OJs jury did have 2 whites and 1 hispanic. I am certainly not going to argue the OJ trial, lol. But the point is this. With many, having a black man display the power of money to win a high profile murder case was unheard of. All of sudden the failings of the justice system was so apparent. But in all those cases like you just mentioned, those people walked away back into society with complete exhoneration. Sadly we have them now dragging in 70-80 year old men for crimes they committed 40 years ago. Hell those men have lived their lives fully, ain't no need trying for some late "in word only" justice now.

And let me tell you, lol. My father-inlaw like a drum, beat the OJ thing to death with my wife. Called her a fool and labeled me dangerous. I ain't lying :), that old dude was talking trash bigtime. But when the little grandchild came, I was a good thing to happen to her, hehehehehehehe. He was alright with me though when he passed. I had earned his respect.
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
But the point is this. With many, having a black man display the power of money to win a high profile murder case was unheard of. All of sudden the failings of the justice system was so apparent.

That was always my favorite part of the trial. Still today if you have enough money or power you can pretty much get away with anything. Worst you get is a slap on the wrist. Or some vaca time in Club Fed. Look at Madoff. Hell he is even defaulting on his fines because he was smart enough to hide all his money with his kids and family and now he claims he is completely bankrupt.

With all that said the only person people universally seem to detest for beating the system is OJ Simpson. And for fuck sake the justice system actually got back at him and threw the book at him for trying to steal back his own stuff.

OJ might have been guilty as hell but our society seems perfectly content with system as is.