YAGT: Going after a girl with a bf? *UPDATE 4*

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: gigapet
when filling out legal documents....if you are not married you select the box that marks you as being 'single'

so yes a boyfriend is not marriage or any obstacle. It is your job to show her why her man sucks and she should be with you. I'd say 95% of women can be persuaded in this fashion. I feel sorry for you if you believe otherwise you are either ignorant to the fact or have been lucky enough to squeek by without getting burned by one of those 95%ers

Well, since it's been well established that this is morally and ethically wrong, I guess I would expect some asswipe who is desperately trying to justify his moral/ethic issues to bring legality into this.

If you're going to bring the whole legal thing into this, what more does being legally married do for a relationship other than bind two people together financially?

Not much really. From a legal standpoint thats pretty much all it does.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: PingSpike

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: gigapet
when filling out legal documents....if you are not married you select the box that marks you as being 'single'

so yes a boyfriend is not marriage or any obstacle. It is your job to show her why her man sucks and she should be with you. I'd say 95% of women can be persuaded in this fashion. I feel sorry for you if you believe otherwise you are either ignorant to the fact or have been lucky enough to squeek by without getting burned by one of those 95%ers

Well, since it's been well established that this is morally and ethically wrong, I guess I would expect some asswipe who is desperately trying to justify his moral/ethic issues to bring legality into this.

If you're going to bring the whole legal thing into this, what more does being legally married do for a relationship other than bind two people together financially?

Not much really. From a legal standpoint thats pretty much all it does.

Exactly. The legal argument is a joke.

 

[MommysLittleMonster]

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster

Who cares if she has a bf or not. The way I see it is, if she happens to leave him for you, she never really liked that guy enough to be with him in the first place. I have no problem going after a girl with a boyfriend. I've done it a few times.

Who cares if she has a husband or not. The way I see it is, if she happens to leave him for you, she never really liked that guy enough to be with him in the first place. I have no problem going after a girl with a husband. I've done it a few times.

Once a cheater, always a cheater.

I dont agree with that "Once a cheater, always a cheater."

I have cheated on an ex before. I was 18. Im 22 now, and I would never do that again.

 

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: gigapet
you cannot establish or moral or ethical truth something based entirely on opinion. The fact is buddy boy that just because you are her boyfriend that does not mean you own her nor does it prohibit someone from flirting with her. If she is a good girl she will take it as flattery when they do and kindly let them down.

You seem terribly insecure and your arguments 'leave her alone shes mine and thats wrong' seems like a typical lame chump reasoning.

asswipe now that was a clever comment, Im sure your gf loves your wit.

Being married to someone doesn't make them "yours" either. Where did this "I own my SO like they're my property" thing come in? 😕 I'm confused.

Old social norms, religion? I dunno...women not being viewed as property is a new concept, not an old one. Marriage originally did imply some sense of ownership, just look at the law books from the first mesopotamian civilizations. The women were pretty much owned by their father until he could unload them onto some guy who married them.

I'm not basing moral/ethical truths on opinion. That's exactly what I'm accusing certain people of. Just because the law doesn't recognize a legal bind between the two people doesn't mean you're free to be a fvcksticksh|tsteak.

Legally...it does actually mean you are free to be a fvcksteak. Everything else is a moral opinion really.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster
I dont agree with that "Once a cheater, always a cheater."

Well I do. While I do understand and accept the concept that people can change and reform, I refuse to ever trust someone once I learn that they've been unfaithful in the past. Probably the same reason I don't trust putting a weapon in the hands of a murderer or give porn to a rapist.

 

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster

Who cares if she has a bf or not. The way I see it is, if she happens to leave him for you, she never really liked that guy enough to be with him in the first place. I have no problem going after a girl with a boyfriend. I've done it a few times.

Who cares if she has a husband or not. The way I see it is, if she happens to leave him for you, she never really liked that guy enough to be with him in the first place. I have no problem going after a girl with a husband. I've done it a few times.

Once a cheater, always a cheater.

I dont agree with that "Once a cheater, always a cheater."

Of course you wouldn't, you're a cheater. 😛

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: PingSpike

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: gigapet
you cannot establish or moral or ethical truth something based entirely on opinion. The fact is buddy boy that just because you are her boyfriend that does not mean you own her nor does it prohibit someone from flirting with her. If she is a good girl she will take it as flattery when they do and kindly let them down.

You seem terribly insecure and your arguments 'leave her alone shes mine and thats wrong' seems like a typical lame chump reasoning.

asswipe now that was a clever comment, Im sure your gf loves your wit.

Being married to someone doesn't make them "yours" either. Where did this "I own my SO like they're my property" thing come in? 😕 I'm confused.

Old social norms, religion? I dunno...women not being viewed as property is a new concept, not an old one. Marriage originally did imply some sense of ownership, just look at the law books from the first mesopotamian civilizations. The women were pretty much owned by their father until he could unload them onto some guy who married them.

I'm not basing moral/ethical truths on opinion. That's exactly what I'm accusing certain people of. Just because the law doesn't recognize a legal bind between the two people doesn't mean you're free to be a fvcksticksh|tsteak.

Legally...it does actually mean you are free to be a fvcksteak. Everything else is a moral opinion really.

How can the law stop you from being a fvcksteak? Fvcksteakness isn't covered by the US Government. There's no law against being unfaithful.

 

[MommysLittleMonster]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster
I dont agree with that "Once a cheater, always a cheater."

Well I do. While I do understand and accept the concept that people can change and reform, I refuse to ever trust someone once I learn that they've been unfaithful in the past. Probably the same reason I don't trust putting a weapon in the hands of a murderer or give porn to a rapist.

A murderer and a former cheater are two different things. I was 18 when I cheated on my ex. An 18 year old male is a raging hormone with legs. But you grow up, and you get a little more mature about relationships and you gain some morals.

 

[RedPickle]

Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
I know, this is very scummy. But there's this girl I really dig who's been dating this guy for a few months. We're very friendly and we hang out every now and then and, lately, I've been thinking about making my attraction clear. Now, if I don't do anything forceful (like kissing the taken girl), would this be so scummy? She's cute, smart, and fun to be around and I don't think her bf gives her the respect that she deserves anyways. The guy's a tool..

Every guy that is the boyfriend of a girl you like is a tool. You would be a scumbag if you did that.

 

[ElFenix]

atot is full of pussies.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: MommysLittleMonster
I dont agree with that "Once a cheater, always a cheater."

Well I do. While I do understand and accept the concept that people can change and reform, I refuse to ever trust someone once I learn that they've been unfaithful in the past. Probably the same reason I don't trust putting a weapon in the hands of a murderer or give porn to a rapist.

A murderer and a former cheater are two different things. I was 18 when I cheated on my ex. An 18 year old male is a raging hormone with legs. But you grow up, and you get a little more mature about relationships and you gain some morals.

The brain doesn't fully develop until mid 20's, but I still think you're a fvcksteak for cheating on your SO and hope you rot in hell. Other than that, have a great day. 😉

While a murderer and a cheater (note no difference between former murderer and murderer so no difference between former cheater and cheater) are two different offenses, I qualify them in the same chapter in my book. Yes, my book's missing some pages, but I guess I'm just one of those odd balls that things cheaters should have a bullet in the skull.

 

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
atot is full of pussies.

Would you attempt to beat up an UFC guy if he flirted with your girlfriend? Do you think your pure rage would burn with the fire of a thousand suns and destroy him? Or would you just end up with a broken arm?

And its not worth fighting over a crappy woman anyway, let the mugger have his bag of dog turds.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: PingSpike

Originally posted by: ElFenix
atot is full of pussies.

Would you attempt to beat up an UFC guy if he flirted with your girlfriend? Do you think your pure rage would burn with the fire of a thousand suns and destroy him? Or would you just end up with a broken arm?

And its not worth fighting over a crappy woman anyway, let the mugger have his bag of dog turds.

there is a difference between a hypothetical so extreme that it is a logical fallacy and being a pussy.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: PingSpike

Originally posted by: ElFenix
atot is full of pussies.

Would you attempt to beat up an UFC guy if he flirted with your girlfriend? Do you think your pure rage would burn with the fire of a thousand suns and destroy him? Or would you just end up with a broken arm?

And its not worth fighting over a crappy woman anyway, let the mugger have his bag of dog turds.

there is a difference between a hypothetical so extreme that it is a logical fallacy and being a pussy.

So which one is the falacy? That you bump in to a UFC fighter every day or that you're a walking vagina?

<edit>

forgot the :laugh:

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: PingSpike

I'm not basing moral/ethical truths on opinion. That's exactly what I'm accusing certain people of. Just because the law doesn't recognize a legal bind between the two people doesn't mean you're free to be a fvcksticksh|tsteak.

Legally...it does actually mean you are free to be a fvcksteak. Everything else is a moral opinion really.
[/quote]

Actually the laws of marriage have nothing to do with fidelity. They have more to do with taxes/money. On tax forms, if you claim that you're married when you're really not, you'd get in big trouble. However, if you cheat with a married woman, you get in no trouble at all, since that is not illegal.

 

[Nutdotnet]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
atot is full of pussies.

I agree. My god. There's it's not terribly immoral with going after another man's woman. Stalking yes...asking if she'd life to pursue something further then friends no. It's her choice...what the heck?!?! Being a b/f or g/f isn't a sign of possession. Until you have that ring on your finger you're fair game...just more difficult then someone who's single.

I love the e-thuggin goin on too. If you're "the man" then you'd have no worries about your girl. The guy could try all he wants but your girl won't leave your side...right...right?!?!?! However, I do think it's fair game to lay a beat-down if necessary...and if you can. It's part of the game, if you're going to hit on another man's woman that's FINE (she ain't married) but you better be prepared to throw down.

So...go for it man. Just understand the consequences...

 

[jjones]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: jjones
Why do you need to ask this question? Go for it, she's single and old enough to make her choices.

"with a boyfriend" is single?

Is she married? Nope, don't think so.

 

[IBuyUFO]

I hope you get your ass kicked so bad you end up eating food through a straw. As long as you know she has a bf you're still breaking the man code. Very scummy of you.

 

[slightlyhuman]

if you're going to hit on another man's woman that's FINE (she ain't married) but you better be prepared to throw down.

OP read this, do whatever the fvck you want. in my book you're a sh1tstick.

no reason for thread to continue imo.

 

[PingSpike]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: PingSpike

Originally posted by: ElFenix
atot is full of pussies.

Would you attempt to beat up an UFC guy if he flirted with your girlfriend? Do you think your pure rage would burn with the fire of a thousand suns and destroy him? Or would you just end up with a broken arm?

And its not worth fighting over a crappy woman anyway, let the mugger have his bag of dog turds.

there is a difference between a hypothetical so extreme that it is a logical fallacy and being a pussy.

This whole thread is largely hypothetical. But change him to some random guy who could definately beat you in a fight, and would likely hurt you extremely bad. Don't tell me you know of no such person, unless you are in fact a UFC fighter that is so extreme he is a logical fallacy.

Would you attack him anyway?

 

[Orsorum]

I'd say make it clear that you're interested and that you're open to a relationship, but I would refrain from any moves until she's broken it off. It's her responsibility to end her previous relationship.

 

[pclstyle]

Originally posted by: DP

Originally posted by: Pacfanweb

Originally posted by: DP
do what you want but if it was my girl, you sir, would have your ass handed to you, on a silver plate.


gg

I guess you'd try that so she'd feel sorry for you after you got your ass stomped?

just making a statement that i don't but up with bullsh1t from other guys. i'm not the biggest guy in the world by any means but i won't back down.

i might not whoop his ass but he damn well will have go through me if he wants her. UNLESS she wants him but that's a completely different story.

Amen.

However, I would successfully beat his ass, and then proceed to rape him, thus adding humiliation to injury. And if he's a normal person, it'll add more injury as well.

 

[CRXican]

All is fair in love and war. Feel free to steal her away, there is no "man code' i this matter.

Enjoy!

 

[slightlyhuman]

Originally posted by: CRXican
All is fair in love and war. Feel free to steal her away, there is no "man code' i this matter.

Enjoy!

guess what, i just said a prayer. it involved a bus and you.

figure the rest out

 

[Jzero]

Originally posted by: DP

Originally posted by: CRXican
All is fair in love and war. Feel free to steal her away, there is no "man code' i this matter.

Enjoy!

guess what, i just said a prayer. it involved a bus and you.

figure the rest out

You are one of those BangBus guys? WAOW!