Add -1.5 negative camber to the front, problem solved. In fact, the Evo sells with some neg camber while the STi doesn't. I swear all the car review shows and magazines are bribed and rigged, as they had to have known this.Originally posted by: jpeyton
Watch the 5/30/2004 Top Gear with the Evo8RS vs. STi, the Evo has slight understeer but the STi is laughable through the same corners.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Name one mass production car that doesn't understeer. :roll:Originally posted by: jpeyton
Good looking car, out and in. STi vs. '05 Cobra......tough decision. The new Mustangs kick ass; STi's have a more boyish charm. Performance-wise, they'll both run down a straight quickly, but both will understeer.
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
They still oversteer a bit, but are waaaay more neutral than they used to be for sure.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Fausto
Um. 911 are notorious for oversteering. They've dialed it down a lot in more recent years but rear-engine and RWD = bigass oversteer.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: kaizersose
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Good looking car, out and in. STi vs. '05 Cobra......tough decision. The new Mustangs kick ass; STi's have a more boyish charm. Performance-wise, they'll both run down a straight quickly, but both will understeer.
Name one mass production car that doesn't understeer. :roll:
911
BS, 911 may be closer to neutral than most but I would suspect Porsche would dial in a slight amount of understeer for a production car just like every other manufacturer out there would. They certainly wouldn't want oversteer in a production car because most drivers wouldn't know what to do with a car that oversteers.
The 70s 911 was notorious for that but Porsche has dialed out that characteristic. Most cars understeer because it is much more predictable than oversteer for the average driver to cope with. Why do you think Porsche worked so hard to eliminate that characteristic? I'll admit that it is probably slightly inclined to oversteer if you are throttle off cornering but I would suspect that it is more neutral than anything.
Very true.Still, most production cars understeer.
Hey, you're the one who got all huffy and started yelling "BS!".Back to the WRX-STi please!
Bullsh!t. :roll::roll::roll:Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
Originally posted by: Vic
As US law requires that 1% of assembly take place in the US, stereos are installed in Vancouver.
I'll have some of whatever Atomicus is smoking, please.Originally posted by: Vic
Bullsh!t. :roll::roll::roll:Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
All Imprezas sold in the US are final assembled in Japan and shipped intact to the port of Vancouver, WA where they are distributed to the dealers. As US law requires that 1% of assembly take place in the US, stereos are installed in Vancouver.
All Legacies (including Outbacks) sold in the US are final assembled at Subaru's plant in Indiana.
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
Give me $1,500 and let me keep the stock TMIC (edit: and hood) and I'll do that for you.Originally posted by: Mwilding
If they made an STi with no hood scoop, an FMIC and no spoiler, I'd be interested...
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
hahahahaha......Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
That's cool.Originally posted by: jntdesign
when i ordered my wrx, i was given a build date, a ship date, a coastal arrival date, a date the truck would pull into the dealer, and a date that my car would be ready for pick up
It's the internet, what'd you expect?Originally posted by: Pocatello
Wow there are a lot of misinformations being spread here.
Just because the driving experiences are different doesn't mean they're not both fun to drive.Originally posted by: Pocatello
Unless you go rallying, I prefer the Mustang GT. I had more fun driving a 92 Mustang GT than the current WRX, not that the turbo WRX isn't fun to drive. But then I always like rear-wheel drive and big V-8. I think it's all about the drive, get in both cars and drive, and see which ones fit you the most. I can hardly wait to test drive the 05 Mustang GT. Which should be available this fall.
Heh. Not only that, but how that process would (in and of itself) lead to reliability problems down the road is what I really want to know!Originally posted by: Eli
hahahahaha......Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
What a tremendous waste of resources. Why on Earth would any company pay people to assemble something, then disassemble it.. and then reassemble it again?! LOL!
Pipe.Crack.Down.Now.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Good looking car, out and in. STi vs. '05 Cobra......tough decision. The new Mustangs kick ass; STi's have a more boyish charm. Performance-wise, they'll both run down a straight quickly, but both will understeer.
Name one mass production car that doesn't understeer. :roll:
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Atomicus
Subarus are assmbled outside of the US, disassmbled then shipped to the US for assembly. Causes serious reliability issues down the road, but other than that, should run fine. Why not an Evo III?
huh? how does that make sense from the company point of view? thats only gonna cost the company more money
btw...get the STi....but not in blue please. that blue is waaay too common...just like silver was back in 2000
Originally posted by: Vic
Just because the driving experiences are different doesn't mean they're not both fun to drive.Originally posted by: Pocatello
Unless you go rallying, I prefer the Mustang GT. I had more fun driving a 92 Mustang GT than the current WRX, not that the turbo WRX isn't fun to drive. But then I always like rear-wheel drive and big V-8. I think it's all about the drive, get in both cars and drive, and see which ones fit you the most. I can hardly wait to test drive the 05 Mustang GT. Which should be available this fall.
I have an 03 WRX and I admit that the upcoming 05 GT tempts me. I'll be test-driving one for sure at least. Be fun to smoke the tires again![]()
Originally posted by: jntdesign
if you go silver and want to swap trunk lids and spoilers - i'm up for it![]()
