• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

XP or 2000?

My impression after a few years with Win2k and having just recently built a new machine that is running XP Pro is that XP is not quite as reliable, but once I get the interface tweaked the way I like it (to overcome Microsoft's "user-friendliness") I prefer XP anyway. I momentarily considered installing win2k on this machine too but I just couldn't see going back a generation when XP is already nearing replacement. I guess a lot of it comes down to how you define "better."
 
I don't really see a reason to not use XP. It does everything that Win2k did for me (and believe me, I was diehard win2k for years), and just tends to work better, especially with driver support. Now if you had an old, slow system, maybe win2k would be a better choice, but generally you can get XP to run just as fast anyway.
 
Originally posted by: onesNzeros
My impression after a few years with Win2k and having just recently built a new machine that is running XP Pro is that XP is not quite as reliable, but once I get the interface tweaked the way I like it (to overcome Microsoft's "user-friendliness") I prefer XP anyway. I momentarily considered installing win2k on this machine too but I just couldn't see going back a generation when XP is already nearing replacement. I guess a lot of it comes down to how you define "better."
Click to expand...


Yes, I prefer XP, is great system,



I'm brasilian 🙂

I not Speak english very good!!!

bye
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top