XP or 2000?

onesNzeros

Member
Dec 5, 2004
72
0
0
My impression after a few years with Win2k and having just recently built a new machine that is running XP Pro is that XP is not quite as reliable, but once I get the interface tweaked the way I like it (to overcome Microsoft's "user-friendliness") I prefer XP anyway. I momentarily considered installing win2k on this machine too but I just couldn't see going back a generation when XP is already nearing replacement. I guess a lot of it comes down to how you define "better."
 

duragezic

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,234
4
81
I don't really see a reason to not use XP. It does everything that Win2k did for me (and believe me, I was diehard win2k for years), and just tends to work better, especially with driver support. Now if you had an old, slow system, maybe win2k would be a better choice, but generally you can get XP to run just as fast anyway.
 

Canterwood

Golden Member
May 25, 2003
1,138
0
0

Mangulinho

Junior Member
Jan 31, 2005
2
0
0
Originally posted by: onesNzeros
My impression after a few years with Win2k and having just recently built a new machine that is running XP Pro is that XP is not quite as reliable, but once I get the interface tweaked the way I like it (to overcome Microsoft's "user-friendliness") I prefer XP anyway. I momentarily considered installing win2k on this machine too but I just couldn't see going back a generation when XP is already nearing replacement. I guess a lot of it comes down to how you define "better."


Yes, I prefer XP, is great system,



I'm brasilian :)

I not Speak english very good!!!

bye