Exactly. The last thing we need is yet another 2K v XP multi page 'discussion'.Originally posted by: jamesbond007
Not to be an ass, but take your pick:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1465875&enterthread=y
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1488287&enterthread=y
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1462519&enterthread=y
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: onesNzeros
My impression after a few years with Win2k and having just recently built a new machine that is running XP Pro is that XP is not quite as reliable, but once I get the interface tweaked the way I like it (to overcome Microsoft's "user-friendliness") I prefer XP anyway. I momentarily considered installing win2k on this machine too but I just couldn't see going back a generation when XP is already nearing replacement. I guess a lot of it comes down to how you define "better."
Originally posted by: jamesbond007
Not to be an ass, but take your pick:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1465875&enterthread=y
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1488287&enterthread=y
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=34&threadid=1462519&enterthread=y
:thumbsup:
