Xbox One has a 40nm APU? [UPDATE: Probably not]

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
Is that what they call news now? Is that all?

Would amd allow m$ to steal 28nm fab space from the desktop/mobile capacity?
 

mavere

Member
Mar 2, 2005
190
4
81
28nm should be mature'ish by now. One would think they'd lose more money on silicon costs and extra cooling by going with 40nm instead...
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Microsoft knows 2 million people will shell out $X to buy a new console after their old one dies from RROD 2 months after the warranty period ends. Why wouldnt they go with 40nm?
 

sefsefsefsef

Senior member
Jun 21, 2007
218
1
71
Current 360 chips are manufactured using 45nm. If the XBO is manufactured at 40nm, and has 10x the transistors compared to 360 (according to MS), then that means that the XBO chip is going to be 8x larger than the 360 chip. That means 8x more expensive, along with a bunch of other negatives that come from large die sizes.

If the XBO chip were to be manufactured at 32nm (which I think is extremely reasonable), then it would be only 5x larger than the 360 chip. Still not great, but not as bad as at 40nm. At 28nm it would be only 3.8x larger than the 360 chip.
 

Enigmoid

Platinum Member
Sep 27, 2012
2,907
31
91
Current 360 chips are manufactured using 45nm. If the XBO is manufactured at 40nm, and has 10x the transistors compared to 360 (according to MS), then that means that the XBO chip is going to be 8x larger than the 360 chip. That means 8x more expensive, along with a bunch of other negatives that come from large die sizes.

If the XBO chip were to be manufactured at 32nm (which I think is extremely reasonable), then it would be only 5x larger than the 360 chip. Still not great, but not as bad as at 40nm. At 28nm it would be only 3.8x larger than the 360 chip.

I think MS said a total of 5 billion transistors in the device.
 

USER8000

Golden Member
Jun 23, 2012
1,542
780
136
Actually in the first link I posted it says the SOC is 28NM and also the GPU is DX11.1 meaning it is GCN based.
 

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,433
5,771
136
Of course if it *is* 40nm, then at least they won't need to worry about the WSA for a while. Giant chips = more wafers used :p
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
I watched it, and the presentation didn't go in depth on the hardware specs and certainly didn't specify 40nm. I'm quite sure it will be 28nm, this "rumor" has to be a mistake.
 

Olikan

Platinum Member
Sep 23, 2011
2,023
275
126
8-core jaguar
768 ops/cicle (aka 12 CU)
Cloud Computing

....man, M$ knows how to fail...
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,579
10,215
126
Perhaps the 40nm was from the APU/GPU sent out for the devkits, and not what the final retail product will be. I cannot imagine them producing a new chip on 40nm, it doesn't make economic, nor technical, sense.
 

Unoid

Senior member
Dec 20, 2012
461
0
76
Perhaps the 40nm was from the APU/GPU sent out for the devkits, and not what the final retail product will be. I cannot imagine them producing a new chip on 40nm, it doesn't make economic, nor technical, sense.

40nm could be cheaper due to less demand than the latest 28nm.

But I agree with others, it's prolly a mistake
 

KompuKare

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,227
1,591
136
Perhaps the 40nm was from the APU/GPU sent out for the devkits, and not what the final retail product will be. I cannot imagine them producing a new chip on 40nm, it doesn't make economic, nor technical, sense.

If the GPU is DirectX 11.1 it's GNC. If it's a custom/semi-custom GNC then I can't see Microsoft having paid for an un-shrink up from 28nm to 40nm. Ditto if the CPU is Jaguar (and if it's 8 core what else can it be?) as that was also never designed for 40nm. A node shrink is costly and time consuming and although I have never heard of a node un-shrink I'm sure it would be costly too.

The more likely answer is 40nm is wrong (even if repeated often enough) and the design is 28nm. Even if Microsoft counted the memory in their transistor count I can't see them not going 28nm from a heat, power and noise viewpoint. Even if an old node 40nm was somehow possible any saving (if any) would be lost after a year or two since they'd then have to pay for a shrink rather than waiting a few more years and shrinking to 20nm or whatever.
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
Will be pretty surprised if it turns out to be 40nm and not 28nm. 40nm would mean a pretty anemic iGPU and would mean a clear performance step pyramid from WiiU<Xbox One<Playstation 4.
 

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
Wired states 40nm also.
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/05/xbox-one/#hardware
A single 40-nanometer chip contains both the CPU and GPU rather than the two dedicated 90-nm chips needed in the 360. In fact, a custom SOC (system on a chip) module made by AMD contains the CPU/GPU chip, the memory, the controller logic, the DRAM, and the audio processors, and connects directly to the heat sink via a phase-change interface material. Whew.
20130514-XBOX-ONE-TEARDOWN-015-660x440.jpg