artemicion
Golden Member
- Jun 9, 2004
- 1,006
- 1
- 76
I got mine at midnight on launch day and am not pissed. I got good usage out of it and I find Kinect a bonus that everyone who buys the cheaper one misses out on. That's just me though.
To the OP if I didn't buy one by now I would just wait. Exclusives are really the only deciding factor IMO and I don't see anything major until the fall/winter.
That makes absolutely no sense. That's like saying "hey don't buy a car now, it'll be cheaper later!" "Hey don't buy that TV, it'll be cheaper later!" Then I turn around and say "yeah but we know that everything devalues or goes on sale later but I want it now."
Gamble? I spent $500 on a game console I wanted. Just like I'd spend $700 on a firearm I wanted. No difference at all. I got what I wanted and obviously since I bought it, $500 was a fair price to me.
My God. You people are so obtuse it's almost amusing.
I'm not talking about early adopter tax. I'm not talking about depreciation of electronics.
This is what I meant by gamble.
Let's say time machines existed and you could go back in time and warn yourself about future events.
Let's say John Smith in November 2013 is deciding whether to buy an XB1. He has a good job, so the $500 isn't a huge issue. He's weighing the pro's and con's and decides to buy at $500.
WOOSH WOOSH WOOSH. FUTURE JOHN SMITH JUMPS OUT OF THE TARDIS.
"November 2013 John Smith! I want you to know that I have information in the future! In the future, you can buy an XB1 for $100 cheaper without the Kinect in about a year, and it will also get an additional $50 price drop! Of course this means you won't be able to play games in the interim if you wait, but I just wanted to provide you with this ADDITIONAL INFORMATION to see if it CHANGES YOUR PURCHASING DECISION."
November 2013 John Smith decides that this additional information changes the balance of the scales and decides to wait a year.
THAT is what I'm referring to as the gamble. The fact that we don't have access to that future information means that when we make a purchasing decision, there is an unknown factor that we cannot account for that could change our decision making process depending on how the future turns out.
Sometimes these future events play out in your favor, making your decision BETTER. Sometimes these future events play out not in your favor, making your decision WORSE. The former tends to make you feel LUCKY, the latter tends to make you feel REGRET.
Taking your car analogy, imagine if you are deciding whether to buy a car and you do. If, in the future, the car turns out to be enormously popular and retain its resale value very well, you'll feel lucky. If, in the future, the car turns out to have defective brakes and you drive off a cliff, you'll feel regret.
Jesus, I'm not criticizing anyone for buying an XB1 Day One. I'm just saying, wouldn't you feel better if things were different and Kinect had 1,000 compatible games, the console was wildly popular, and actually increased in value since you bought it? Instead of Kinect going defunct and the unpopularity of the console causing it to decrease in value like it actually did?
