Originally posted by: M11293
Wow, I kinda feel like an idiot. Right after I buy a 360, HDMI ports are rumored to be the next thing on 360s. Is this true?
How much better would the rumored HDMI make the picture quality? My TV is only listed as having HDMI IN video as 1080i, 720p, 480p, and 480i, so a 1080p HDMI connection doesn't really pertain to me?
It won't make a big difference. HDMI is better than Component quality wise because its all digital, but you probably won't be able to tell a big difference.
The big reason for HDMI is HDCP, which is an encryption technology used to encrypt the signal from your player to your TV. The reason its important is because Hollywood wants it so that when playing back HDDVD and BluRay discs that the player must use encryption or it will downres the video to 540p. But -- since most people don't have HDMI ports on their TV, the ICT (image constraint token) shouldn't be used on discs until 2010 or so -- by then, a standalone player should be much cheaper.
The short of it is that HDMI will eventually be important for movies because of HDCP, and HDMI is slightly better than component. It is also more widely supported for 1080p (not all 1080p TVs support 1080p over component or VGA - while most "Full HD" 1080p TVs will support it over HDMI 1.3).
If you're a videophile, and you have a really expensive TV, you can probably tell the difference between component and hdmi. Personally, I can't tell the difference on my Sony KDS-R60XBR1. If I had the choice, sure I'd choose HDMI over Component, but I don't think I'd re-buy my 360 just for hdmi.