• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Xbox 2 specifications now officially available

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The only reason why PC's need so much memory is overhead. Xenon will be running one game at a time. I don't know about you guys, but my PC doesn't run one thing at a time.
 
Originally posted by: X
Is anyone else wary of the 256MB of RAM? How can they get away with this when you need 1GB in the pc world? Does the operating system have such a lean overhead that you can get away with that kind of difference?


Yes, the operating system is that lean - also, remember most games are being run at lower resolutions, textures, models, etc don't have to be nearly as large.
 
Originally posted by: kextyn
I'd really like to see them release a triple 3.0GHz core CPU and modern high end graphics technology for $300. I really don't see it happening. When have consoles (at least hardware) ever been BETTER than PC's and cost less? Anyone? yea...thats what I thought.

Razor...razorblades. Console manufacturers aren't in the business to sell consoles, they're in to sell games. They'll lose money on a $300 console, but if they sell 50 million units and each unit has an attach rate of 5 $50 games...do the math.

Let's say they lose around $100 per console, then that's -$5 billon dollars. But they'll make $12.5 billion in game sales. They net $7.5 billion dollars and that's shooting low because the price of the components goes down after time. Basic economics folks. For example, I own 30+ Xbox games. There are millions of Xbox owners just like me.

The console industry is a software business, not a hardware one.
 
Originally posted by: rikadik
Does anyone get the feeling that one day people just won't bother with PCs for gaming? I'm close to it you know, because it just makes financial sense. With a console you don't get caught up with the constantly improving technologies, like a new better GPU every 3 months. And you also KNOW that anything you buy for a console will work beautifully, unless its broken. The next few years will be very interesting.

if someone can beat me in ut2k4 with an xbox controller, that's when i'll switch. until then, fast, precise optical mouse and keyboard for life : )
 
If these specs are true, then I would buy one, take all the parts out of it and make it into a pc with one of those cards. The companies that sell them would make a fortune. They are basically going to be selling a $2000 computer for $300. Can these specs really be true?
 
Originally posted by: Cheesetogo
If these specs are true, then I would buy one, take all the parts out of it and make it into a pc with one of those cards. The companies that sell them would make a fortune. They are basically going to be selling a $2000 computer for $300. Can these specs really be true?

If they release it at $299, I'll buy it the day it comes out. Sh!t, even if they release it at $499 I'll buy it the day it comes out.
 
Originally posted by: MrControversial
Originally posted by: kextyn
I'd really like to see them release a triple 3.0GHz core CPU and modern high end graphics technology for $300. I really don't see it happening. When have consoles (at least hardware) ever been BETTER than PC's and cost less? Anyone? yea...thats what I thought.

Razor...razorblades. Console manufacturers aren't in the business to sell consoles, they're in to sell games. They'll lose money on a $300 console, but if they sell 50 million units and each unit has an attach rate of 5 $50 games...do the math.

Let's say they lose around $100 per console, then that's -$5 billon dollars. But they'll make $12.5 billion in game sales. They net $7.5 billion dollars and that's shooting low because the price of the components goes down after time. Basic economics folks. For example, I own 30+ Xbox games. There are millions of Xbox owners just like me.

The console industry is a software business, not a hardware one.


And that model failed, champ! Why did they axe the HD from the base model of XBNext? Because they lost too much money on the original XBox hardware sales.

As you said in an earlier post, the PS2 admits defeat graphically. However, if I had to recommend someone a current gen system now, it would be PS2 without a doubt, as you're 100% right about the software argument. MS had great sales this season BECAUSE of a MFG strike by Sony. Sony's in the driver's seat, and they'll be staying there. 😉
 
Undoubtedly they'll be taking a loss on each unit sold, but if they can make it up in software sales...

Also, the 3 GHz of a Xenon won't be like the 3 GHz of a G5, or even the 3 GHz of a P4. The core is capable of performing much less per clock. However, with 3 cores it's still a monster. 🙂

It will be interesting to see how the games pan out.

Xenon is gonna have 3 moderate speed cores. Run the code on just one core and the game may just suck. The coders are gonna have to really try to make use of all three cores.

Cell is gonna have a much faster clocked CPU with a PPE core very similar to Xenon's core, but most of the work is supposed to be done by the SPE vector units, of which there are a ton of them.

Porting and optimization of these games from one platform to the other is gonna prove interesting... 😛
 
Originally posted by: Eug
Undoubtedly they'll be taking a loss on each unit sold, but if they can make it up in software sales...

Also, the 3 GHz of a Xenon won't be like the 3 GHz of a G5, or even the 3 GHz of a P4. The core is capable of performing much less per clock. However, with 3 cores it's still a monster. 🙂

It will be interesting to see how the games pan out.

Xenon is gonna have 3 moderate speed cores. Run the code on just one core and the game may just suck. The coders are gonna have to really try to make use of all three cores.

Cell is gonna have a much faster clocked CPU with a PPE core very similar to Xenon's core, but most of the work is supposed to be done by the SPE vector units, of which there are a ton of them.

Porting and optimization of these games from one platform to the other is gonna prove interesting... 😛


Well said.
 
Originally posted by: doublejbass
Originally posted by: MrControversial
Originally posted by: kextyn
I'd really like to see them release a triple 3.0GHz core CPU and modern high end graphics technology for $300. I really don't see it happening. When have consoles (at least hardware) ever been BETTER than PC's and cost less? Anyone? yea...thats what I thought.

Razor...razorblades. Console manufacturers aren't in the business to sell consoles, they're in to sell games. They'll lose money on a $300 console, but if they sell 50 million units and each unit has an attach rate of 5 $50 games...do the math.

Let's say they lose around $100 per console, then that's -$5 billon dollars. But they'll make $12.5 billion in game sales. They net $7.5 billion dollars and that's shooting low because the price of the components goes down after time. Basic economics folks. For example, I own 30+ Xbox games. There are millions of Xbox owners just like me.

The console industry is a software business, not a hardware one.


And that model failed, champ! Why did they axe the HD from the base model of XBNext? Because they lost too much money on the original XBox hardware sales.

As you said in an earlier post, the PS2 admits defeat graphically. However, if I had to recommend someone a current gen system now, it would be PS2 without a doubt, as you're 100% right about the software argument. MS had great sales this season BECAUSE of a MFG strike by Sony. Sony's in the driver's seat, and they'll be staying there. 😉

They lost money because of the initial investment of the Xbox and initiatives like Xbox Live which cost Microsoft $2 billion to set-up. Then let's not mention Japan. Cutting the hard drive kinda pissed me off as well, but they want to cut the cost of the console so they don't lose as much. Did you know that this quarter the Xbox division turned its first profit? They weren't expecting a profit until next generation.
 
Yes, but the point being TOO MUCH money was lost giving away the HDD in the base Xbox.

Halo 2 helped, but the only reason the XBox division turned a profit was because of Sony's manufacturing strike and subsequent shortage.
 
I wonder if this whole Xbox business ever made a cent of profit for Microsoft.

Or if Gates even gives a damn.
 
xbox = good graphics
ps2= decent graphics + the best controller out there.

(i have all consoles, and i love xbox for the graphics and online play, but the ps2 controller so beats all the others...)

edit: btw, i will buy the newest xbox.. cause it will rock!
 
i will buy both. be like me and own all systems...never have to settle. but not everyone can do that. its true the money is in the games. microsoft said theyd like a price point of $300. i wouldnt be surprised to see anything between $3-400 with the console markets steady climb in price over the years. They also said the games are gonna cost more to make. which means either we pay the difference, ending up in more expensive games, or we get shorter games. personally thats bs
 
Wow...sounds pretty impressive. And although I've never owned a console before (never really had the money when I was younger), I'd probably jump on this for $300. Hell, I paid more than that last summer just for my 6800GT.

Did the article mention what kind of video outputs the system would have? I'd be running this through my LCD monitor (2005FPW), as I'm living in a dorm and can't really afford a huge HDTV nor would I have room for one. If it's component only, then that would give me an excuse to upgrade to the 2405FPW...😛
 
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: X
Is anyone else wary of the 256MB of RAM? How can they get away with this when you need 1GB in the pc world? Does the operating system have such a lean overhead that you can get away with that kind of difference?


console is a dedicated gaming machine, the xbox only had 64mb, and look how good that is, i think 256mb will be sufficient

answer: the xbox isnt a practical pc. its a gaming console. hence, why would it even need more then 256mb of ram? it aint going to run photoshop or encode videos.
 
I thought the latest rumor was calling this machine Xbox 360 or just 360.... Also, the other day i read about there being 3 versions, a base model, a model with a HDD in it ( i would assume you could buy the base and microsoft will sell you a "special" HDD for an increased cost if you wanted to add it later on). The third is to be a xbox 360 PC, which is a computer with WinXP media center edition that plays xbox games; this version being set to release at the same time as PS3 to steal some of Sony's thunder, the base model earlier than PS3 to gain market share. Of course, nothing is confirmed. :beer:
 
About the Xbox division finally turning over profits...

I reckon in the last 6-12 months Xboxs have just become much more desirable. People have started to get weened off their PS2s. Lots of people I know have bought Xboxs recently, despite swearing by their PS2s for years. I dont think I took the Xbox that seriously when it came out, but now its the only console I own.

Xbox Live & Halo 2 are the only reasons you need to own an Xbox instead of any of the other consoles, in my opinion.

Unfortunately the PS2 does seem to have much more popular pads than the Xbox, but in my experience the PS2 ones break much more easily that the Xbox ones. And while the dualshock is good for sports and driving games, the Xbox Controller S is just *PERFECT* for FPS on consoles.
 
Xbox started making its first profits after HALO2

Xenon (the official name) will cost $450

GPU - Xenon's GPU is a generation beyond the ATI X800. Its clock speed is 500 MHz and it supports Shader 3.0. Developers are currently working with an alpha 2 GPU. Beta GPU units are expected by May and the final GPU is slated for a summer release. The final GPU will be more powerful than anything on the market today; in game terms, it would handle a game like Half-Life 2 with ease.


Optical Drive - As many have speculated, Xenon will not use Blu-Ray or HD-DVD. Games will come on dual-layer DVD-9 discs. While the media is the same as that of the current Xbox, the usable space on each disc is up to 7 GB. The drive is slated to run at 12X.

Memory Units - Xenon will use 64 MB to 1,024 MB memory cards. 8 MB is reserved for system use, leaving a 56 MB to 1,016 MB for user data.

Hard Drive - As many have speculated, Xenon's hard drive is optional. 2 GB of the drive will be used as game cache. The final drive size is still being determined.


As well as presumed EyeToy-style gaming, the camera is one of the all-new Xbox Life features. Players will be able to take photos of themselves which can be used in-game, for placing pictures on user profiles and for video chat.

It cannot be stressed how important Xbox Live2 is for xenon. According to GDC mutterings, Microsoft is requiring that all Xbox 2 games be Live enabled. The future is online.

Games will also need to tie in with a central gamer profile feature, which is basically a sinister log of just about everything you do over Xbox Live: your scores, your reputation, special significant gaming achievements... it's all logged.

Even when not online everything is saved to your profile, so that developers can see your times and scores against everyone else who has the game. They can then award you with special gifts, awards or gamer profile points for being excellent.

An update to the Gamertag system currently in place is the 'Gamer Card'. This holds all your crucial profile information, such as your picture, name and stats and can be given to other players you deem worthy of friendship. Players can store 1500 friends ? a limit unlikely to be reached by anyone.

Marketplace. Browseable by game, by genre, and in a number of other ways, the Marketplace will provide a one-stop shop for consumers to acquire episodic content, new game levels, maps, weapons, vehicles, skins and new community-created content.

Micro-transactions. Breaking down barriers of small-ticket online commerce, micro-transactions will allow developers and the gaming community to charge as little as they like for content they create and publish on Marketplace. Imagine players slapping down $.99 to buy a one-of-a-kind, fully tricked-out racing car to be the envy of their buddies.
 
"also, remember most games are being run at lower resolutions, textures, models, etc don't have to be nearly as large"

That's what I'm worried about. Why settle for lower quality graphics when they could just bump up the RAM? I would be willing to pay more for a console that provided a noticeable increase in graphics quality through having more RAM. Is there going to be dedicated RAM in the R500 GPU?
 
This is a big question for me, but probably not that important to others. Will I be able to use my XBox controller with the new Xenon console? I LOVE the original XBox controller and I have a special controller that won't be matched in the console world (or PC world for that matter) for a LONG time. I would love to move it over to the new Xenon console.
 
Back
Top