X1950 XTX

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

obeseotron

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,910
0
0
It's not out of the question that ATI would redesign the x1900 this quickly. From what I understand 90nm to 80nm is a simple jump compared to 110nm to 90nm, and the r580 is gigantic in size. ATI's stuff right now is probably superior to nvidia's from a performance/technology standpoint, but not exactly from an economical standpoint on the high end. ATI has every reason to shrink and optimize the R580 as quickly as possible to improve their margins.
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Has ATI forgotten where to make money, in the mid-range? Still no X1900XL?

I think they're following the NV model of releasing the fastest card so opinion of you goes up and your entire line sells better.

I also believe (but this is purely speculation) that ATI is releasing the X1800GTO to both hold the fort until an X1900XL/X1900GTO is ready and also to clear out surplus X1800 series cores.
 

humanure

Senior member
Dec 28, 2005
441
0
0
maybe it is true, 1GB memory and die shrink, r581 before r600. page in French. x1950


sorry, here's the translation-
Whereas R600 full directx 10 was to leave for next September, ATI would have informed its partners, by announcing a levelling of current R580 having for principal modification, the smoothness of engraving passing from 90 Nm with 80 Nm and of course with higher frequencies.

The fault will say to me, the delay of Windows Vista, because without Vista directx 10 does not have for the moment any interest, I am explained Windows Vista has a new office in 3d vectorial to name Aero, if a chart Directx 10 is not installed, the office of Windows Vista will be very close to Windows XP.

From a marketing point of view, it thus seems more attractive of launching a whole bottom-of-the-range range to top-of-the-range managing directx 10 for the period of January 2007.

R581 could have a giga byte of memory with format GDDR 4 if Samsung is ready in time to provide its mass memory.
 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
Beyond that, I doubt they'd keep that HSF given the issues users are reporting with it. I'd expect the X1950XTXPE to have a Silencer or Zalman type cooling solution.

It would just be too risky of a business move for ATI to use the XT/XTXs fan.

they carried it over form the x1800; why would this be any different?
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
There have been rumors of a 80nm r590 for a while now, none of this is a surprise. I'd be surprised if they dont release it. Also, the 24ps+8tmu rv560 sound a lot like what I said the rv530 should have been, good to see them finally improving their sub-$200 products. A 36ps+12tmu rv570 will most likely replace the x1800xt as the $300 card, and will probably outperform it too. All their high end and midrange products are moving to a r580-derived architecture.
 

FalllenAngell

Banned
Mar 3, 2006
132
0
0
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: FalllenAngell
Beyond that, I doubt they'd keep that HSF given the issues users are reporting with it. I'd expect the X1950XTXPE to have a Silencer or Zalman type cooling solution.

It would just be too risky of a business move for ATI to use the XT/XTXs fan.

they carried it over form the x1800; why would this be any different?

I suppose you're right, but I can always hope for a stock Silencer. :(
 
Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
If that's true...and the XT doesn't cost $600+, that would be perfect for me (assuming I could scrape together the cash in the first place, lol)... A single-slot high-end card would be great for me so I could retain use of my PCI-E x1 slot if I wanted to use it in the future..
 

Banzai042

Senior member
Jul 25, 2005
489
0
0
Hmm, looks interesting. Anybody with an 1900xt/x with an overclock that high around here? I'm wonder what kind of performance this could be expected to give. Also, why do so many people bash the stock DS fan on ATI cards? Granted by all accounts it runs noisy and I can see a problem with that. I've always figured that if they found a way to reduce noise in that fan and possibly give it a lower thermal resistance it would be a great system. Hell, i've even been hoping nVidia would release something similar. The biggest benefit i see from a cooler like that is the fact that you can put a card directly next to the dual slot cooler with no worries whatsoever about cooling problems.
 

the Chase

Golden Member
Sep 22, 2005
1,403
0
0
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: the Chase
Originally posted by: jayanath
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Has ATI forgotten where to make money, in the mid-range? Still no X1900XL?

thats what i thought but,
as extelleron said there's no place for x1900xl to fit in

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30687 - 2nd to last paragraph.

Still, where does it fit? The X1900 AIW is 48ps and 500/980 and gets eaten alive by the X1800XT, unless the X1900XL is much faster it will too. It would have to BEAT the X1800XT and be available for -$300. In most games a 550/1300 or so X1900 isnt going to beat a 625/1500 X1800XT just because it has 3x the shaders.

Good question. I don't know.
 

Frostwake

Member
Jan 12, 2006
163
0
0
Actually, the specs look very real, and to people saying it looks fake cuz of grammar etc, remember those x1800 slides that everyone thought fake cuz of "SM3 Done Right!" ? Well they were real...
 

Crescent13

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
4,793
1
0
Originally posted by: Frostwake
Actually, the specs look very real, and to people saying it looks fake cuz of grammar etc, remember those x1800 slides that everyone thought fake cuz of "SM3 Done Right!" ? Well they were real...

Yeah but the x1800 paper didn't come out on april fools day.


Still I am hopeful that they will actually fix the heat.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: darXoul
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Yeah, this is 90% fake. Some small grammar/typographical errors give it away from what I can see. Still, this sounds like a good possibility. As I said above, a better HSF+80nm should easily make 750/1800 possible.

Agreed. I say it's fake for sure. Too many errors...

Since you see errors, can you point them out please?

Other than removing spaces between words to avoid hyphenation, I can't see anything wrong.
 

Madellga

Senior member
Sep 9, 2004
713
0
0
Originally posted by: Frostwake
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Probably fake but definatly not out of reach for ATI. W/ 80nm process and a slightly better cooler 750/1800 is hardly impossible for them to reach.


Yea, and if it id indeed quiter and cooler I wanna see what nv fans come up with next as an excuse

Funny, back in the 9800/X800 days this was one of the arguments used by ATI fans against the 5800/5900.

BTW, before more crap comes, I'm coming from a 9700/9800/X800/X850 run.
No fan here, just end user.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Originally posted by: Madellga
Originally posted by: Frostwake
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Probably fake but definatly not out of reach for ATI. W/ 80nm process and a slightly better cooler 750/1800 is hardly impossible for them to reach.


Yea, and if it id indeed quiter and cooler I wanna see what nv fans come up with next as an excuse

Funny, back in the 9800/X800 days this was one of the arguments used by ATI fans against the 5800/5900.

BTW, before more crap comes, I'm coming from a 9700/9800/X800/X850 run.
No fan here, just end user.

The Nvidia selection was not as good in performance and was ALSO loud, this round ATI has the performance and I guess is loud. My two 1800xl's are not loud in my opinion because my cpu fan is much louder.
 

Cooler

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,835
0
0

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,786
789
136
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Is Geminia Dual GPUs on one die or just two GPUs on one board?

It's is 2 GPU's and another core logic. I'd guess the unnamed core logic will be the Gemini GPU itself.

GeCube would not release high resolution images of the card, but we were able to confirm that the design uses three processors: two Radeon X1600 GPUs and a third unnamed core logic tying the two together.


The slide itself is very sloppy & if the picture in the background is the "updated cooler" i't's not a big update, just looks like the X850XT Cooler with a bigger heatsink.
 

Madellga

Senior member
Sep 9, 2004
713
0
0
Originally posted by: Zstream
Originally posted by: Madellga
Originally posted by: Frostwake
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Probably fake but definatly not out of reach for ATI. W/ 80nm process and a slightly better cooler 750/1800 is hardly impossible for them to reach.


Yea, and if it id indeed quiter and cooler I wanna see what nv fans come up with next as an excuse

Funny, back in the 9800/X800 days this was one of the arguments used by ATI fans against the 5800/5900.

BTW, before more crap comes, I'm coming from a 9700/9800/X800/X850 run.
No fan here, just end user.

The Nvidia selection was not as good in performance and was ALSO loud, this round ATI has the performance and I guess is loud. My two 1800xl's are not loud in my opinion because my cpu fan is much louder.


No no, the difference in performance was substantial in that case. Now the difference between the cards is smaller, with ATI winning some benchmarks whereas Nvidia has others.

At the end, I'm not talking about performance. I just wanted to point out that the same argument can be used for both sides. I hate hypocrisy.