Originally posted by: inveterate
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Quoting "Bassically the reason that i see a problem, if there is one,, was because i was playign halo and got 300-470frames on it while i used to get 500+ on my 7900gt, this is with same settings, and actually LOWER resolution. so i'm alarmed yes."
300+ FPS.. halo on PC has really bad GFX. But your 2d/3d clock is an issue.
thx for ur comment but, i've resolved my 2d/3d clock issues, it was downclocking and it clocks to 789/1640 by itself on 3D, which i checked that it is doing for HALO,
BUT it is still true that i get less frames at the same quality setting on the x1900xtx.
Halo doesn't have bad graphics, it's still nice to look at, and at 1680x1050 u hardly notice the lack of antialiasing, especially when ur moving, and ofcourse the free antialiasing of an LCD's 8ms minuet ghosting while in motion.
MAIN PROBLEM,, frame dropps that were not present with 79gt,,, less frames in general!!
There is nothing wrong with your card, your drivers might be out of whack and if you're going to claim that you can tell the difference between 400fps and 500fps then I pity you. Also, I'm going to assume your have a DELL 2005/07 FPW, this monitor runs at 60HZ refresh so without VSync you are going to have major tearing issues, espepcially at 400fps.
If you want to test your hardware how about getting a recent game that wasn't a converted piece of console trash in the first place? Halo was a POS on PC when it was released and that was a few years ago, I doubt much has changed.