• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

x1900xt / 7900gtx / 7950gx2

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: beggerking
7950gx2
pro: fastest on planet,HDCP built-in
con: expensive

7900gt
pro: cheap, fast if overclocked
con: slow if you do not overclock

1900xt
pro: fast
con: loud, runs hot..


with all do respect, QFT, get a 7900 GTX which has just PROs and no cons. Fast, cheaper then 7950GX2, will easily handle 1920x1440, runs cool and reliably.

 
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: josh6079
Its 1 GBof ram is there for the whole system to use which is kind of nice.

This is definitely NOT true...the Techreport review of the 7950GX2 says it is still only a 512mb frame buffer...You do not get 1gb of video memory. It has the same limitation as if you had 2 7900GTXs in SLI. THey market it as a 1gb card but you certainly do not get a 1gb frame buffer, its only 512mb.

Yeah, I thought so too at first. Each GPU has 512 to work with, yet the PCI-E lane still draws 1GB total to the 3D app. Think of it like a dual core processor with 2 MB cache, 1mb for each core. The CPU still has 2MB of cache.
 
Back
Top