• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

WWIII Thread:7-10-06 Hannity & Colmes say WWIII has begun

dmcowen674

No Lifer
The Rich are preparing for WWIII

What do us peons do to prepare for the War?

Between Foriegn Policy Issues and Religious radicals controlling the U.S., we are no doubt headed for WWIII.

The world didn't make a big deal about North Korea because not seen as a threat to Isreal but that is not the case with Iran.

Enjoy


5-13-2006 Gold Mining Companies Enjoy Rising Prices On WWIII Fears

DAKAR, Senegal - With oil soaring to new highs and the U.S. dollar back down, investors are looking to the usual haven: gold.

Gold has jumped from about $450 an ounce in November to $732 in electronic trading Friday on the New York Mercatile Exchange, a surge analysts attribute to investors looking for a safe asset amid worries about Iran's nuclear program, a weak dollar, and inflation tied to high oil prices.

A.G. Edwards analyst Dan Vaught said the price tends to be driven by investor beliefs about the stability of financial markets.

"If you think the world's going to end, you buy gold," Vaught said. "It protects against a major breakdown in equity markets."

"Gold prices can stay high as long as the world seems to be going toward World War III"
======================

2-10-2006 Use of force debated on Iran

WASHINGTON - In a private meeting with European diplomats this week, a former senior U.S. official raised the idea of launching a dozen B2 bombers in an air raid aimed at crippling key Iranian nuclear facilities.

U.S. warplanes could destroy some Iranian nuclear plants but many facilities are unknown or underground

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, aiming to calm anxieties, told a parliamentary committee on Wednesday military action is not inevitable even if Iran develops a bomb.

But others say that force, while fraught with potential dangers like further inflaming hostility in the Muslim world, may ultimately be deemed necessary, at least by Washington.

"There is only one thing worse than the United States exercising a military option and that is a nuclear-armed Iran," Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a possible 2008 U.S. presidential candidate, told CBS Television.

Some experts have predicted that Israel, feeling threatened by Iran, could take early pre-emptive action. Bush may have eased such concern when he told Reuters last week the United States would "rise to Israel's defense" if needed.

 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Some experts have predicted that Israel, feeling threatened by Iran, could take early pre-emptive action. Bush may have eased such concern when he told Reuters last week the United States would "rise to Israel's defense" if needed.

:roll: No thanks.
 
Why would Russian care? They've been dealing with Chechnya for quite a few years and they can barely manage that, I doubt that they'd run up to fight someone else.
 
Russia just voted to refer Iran to the Security Council...and you think they'd just change their mind and go to war with a country they can't defeat? Do you ever think about what you say before you say it?
 
Big difference between expounding a theory and deploying for a mission.

Again; false title to mislead; shades of exactly what you complain about. Still hanging around your darker side?
 
I wouldn't even call the thread title misleading, more like complete fabrication.

I hope the mods delete this POS.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Russia just voted to refer Iran to the Security Council...and you think they'd just change their mind and go to war with a country they can't defeat? Do you ever think about what you say before you say it?

 
In a WW3 I doubt it would be a massive armed conflict, more like countries would just hold ecnomic warfare, and stop trading with (insert country). With todays global market, this would be much more effective than a large scale conflict.
 
Originally posted by: realsup
hmm a former Us official says something and you start crying WWIII

What a joke.

I agree, most people in the world aren't myopic and see things as they really are. If the US was so bad, why do we tolerate Cuba's Castro when it's so damn close?

Iran is heading for a head thumping and the world will rightly sit back and watch things as they *should* unfold and realize that the world will be a better place for it. A government that doesn't acknowledge the Holocaust shouldn't have nuclear arms, or even the CHANCE to have them.

Now, lets all gather in the streets and carve ourselves up.
 
Russia and China will not do a thing.

They will do exactly what they did for the Arabs during their fight with Israel.

Arm them

That is it.
 
Bit of a stretch with the whole topic and summary, I agree - but where are all you guys when zentroll or some other parrot creates worse threads?
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
notice the Op is nowhere to be seen.....misleading title...OP sits back and laughs at all the responses.lol

2-11-2006 Iran Threatens to Leave Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was speaking in Tehran on Saturday four days after the U.N. Security Council formally received notification about Iran and its nuclear program from the International Atomic Energy Agency, opening the door toward potential sanctions.

About the Russian proposal to enrich uranium on Russian soil and then send it to Iran, Ahmadinejad was skeptical.

"There are not guarantees that you are going to stand by your commitments," he said, referring to the Russians.

But Iranians have their own ways of gaining an edge, he added. "Allah is our master. He helps us and he's not going to help you."
 
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?

No, just the opposite.

I am against our troops dying for false causes or Religious zealots.

I would've turned much of the ME to glass a looooong time ago or at least used a huge portion of our Air firepower to lay waste most of the trouble spots in the Mideast.

I have laid out my plans and solutions repeatedly and I know they would've worked and still would work.

This Vietnam II crap is just that, crap.
 
Ahmadinejad: Israel 'will be removed'

Tehran (dpa) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Saturday that the Palestinians and "other nations" will eventually remove Israel from the region.

Tehran (dpa) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Saturday that the Palestinians and "other nations" will eventually remove Israel from the region.

Addressing a mass demonstration in Tehran - one of many organized throughout Iran to commemorate the 27th anniversary of the Islamic revolution - he once again questioned the Holocaust "fairy tale".

"We ask the West to remove what they created sixty years ago and if they do not listen to our recommendations, then the Palestinian nation and other nations will eventually do this for them," Ahmadinejad said in a ceremony marking the 27th anniversary of the Islamic revolution.

"Do the removal of Israel before it is too late and save yourself from the fury of regional nations," the ultra-conservative president said. He once again called the Holocaust a "fairy tale" and said Europeans have become hostages of "Zionists" in Israel.

He also accused Europeans for not allowing "neutral scholars" to investigate in Europe and make a scientific report on "the truth about the fairy tale of Holocaust."

"How comes that insulting the prophet of Muslims worldwide is justified within the framework of press freedom, but investigating about the fairy tale Holocaust is not?" Ahmadinejad said.

The clash of civilizations is certainly growing nigh.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Russia just voted to refer Iran to the Security Council...and you think they'd just change their mind and go to war with a country they can't defeat? Do you ever think about what you say before you say it?

the russians are not friends of America, so stop kidding yourself into thinking they will go along with whatever America wants. Sure, on the face side they may appear to support us, but once we turn our backs they will be back to their old tricks. Just like they did with Syria back in the 80's. And before we go bomb Busher, we better be sure that the 1000+ foriengers who work around that facility are gone.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?
No, just the opposite.

I am against our troops dying for false causes or Religious zealots.

I would've turned much of the ME to glass a looooong time ago or at least used a huge portion of our Air firepower to lay waste most of the trouble spots in the Mideast.

I have laid out my plans and solutions repeatedly and I know they would've worked and still would work.

This Vietnam II crap is just that, crap.
Lay out your solution again...I missed it with all the Republican bashing.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?
No, just the opposite.

I am against our troops dying for false causes or Religious zealots.

I would've turned much of the ME to glass a looooong time ago or at least used a huge portion of our Air firepower to lay waste most of the trouble spots in the Mideast.

I have laid out my plans and solutions repeatedly and I know they would've worked and still would work.

This Vietnam II crap is just that, crap.

Lay out your solution again...I missed it with all the Republican bashing.

Well no need to re-hash and spell it our again until the said Republicans are no longer in power. Until then things will remain the current status quo and only get worse. But of course you and the rest are enjoying it.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?
No, just the opposite.

I am against our troops dying for false causes or Religious zealots.

I would've turned much of the ME to glass a looooong time ago or at least used a huge portion of our Air firepower to lay waste most of the trouble spots in the Mideast.

I have laid out my plans and solutions repeatedly and I know they would've worked and still would work.

This Vietnam II crap is just that, crap.
Lay out your solution again...I missed it with all the Republican bashing.
Well no need to re-hash and spell it our again until the said Republicans are no longer in power. Until then things will remain the current status quo and only get worse. But of course you and the rest are enjoying it.
I think you are bull$hitting your solution...if you don't say what it is, it'll be obvious you have nothing to propose except complaining.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Stunt
So Dave, you are against military action and against nuclear weapons in Iran...
What's your solution?
No, just the opposite.

I am against our troops dying for false causes or Religious zealots.

I would've turned much of the ME to glass a looooong time ago or at least used a huge portion of our Air firepower to lay waste most of the trouble spots in the Mideast.

I have laid out my plans and solutions repeatedly and I know they would've worked and still would work.

This Vietnam II crap is just that, crap.
Lay out your solution again...I missed it with all the Republican bashing.
Well no need to re-hash and spell it our again until the said Republicans are no longer in power. Until then things will remain the current status quo and only get worse. But of course you and the rest are enjoying it.
I think you are bull$hitting your solution...if you don't say what it is, it'll be obvious you have nothing to propose except complaining.

I spelled out a good part of my solution. I am all for the B2's and much more.
 
Back
Top