Originally posted by: pnad
I thought most of ATOT would be evolutionists. Good to see some fellow creationists here.
I could argue with them, but in the end they BELIEVE what they want to BELIEVE and I don't think any amount of debate will change that.
I have no problem with evolutionists as long as they recognize it as a belief and not a proven fact. Evolution is a theory and has not been 'proven'.
Wrong-o, but nice try. A SCIENTIFIC theory is very different than your regular old run-of-the-mill generic theory. Scientific theories are not theories. They are tested and verified hypothesis about how a particular phenomena occurs. If you'd like the layman's definition a scientific theory is a fact. Gravity, relativity, quantum mechanics, evolution are all scientific theories... meaning scientists have accepted them as the laws or rules and would only revise them if evidence comes into play that refutes them.
So, the "theory" of evolution is, in fact, the scientifically accepted reason as to how we got to where we are today. There is no 'belief' involved in evolution, unless you count belief in the scientific method.
To address your last point, nothing in science is "proven." Gravity isn't "proven." Relativity isn't "proven" and neither is evolution. NOTHING in science is proven beyond all reasonable doubt because that is impossible.
What you choose to believe is entirely up to you, but don't go around thinking that there is any doubt among scientists as to the validity of evolution.