wtf?

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: uclaLabrat

If you have no life, how do you have evolution, pray tell?
You don't have to have abiogenesis to have imperfect replicators. Once you have imperfect replicators, you have evolution.

 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
The world will be so much better when people realize both ideas can co-exist.

No, I think it would be much better if we stuck to teaching about science in our science classes instead of sky fairies.

Where did you go to school that your science teachers taught you about creationism? Sounds like more of a teacher issue than a system-wide issue.

My comments were more towards the ultra conservative Christian belief set. I think most (non-delusional) non-Christians admit that they don't know where all of the matter in the universe came from. Ultra conservative Christians tend to think evolution is the exact opposite of their beliefs, when they couldn't be more wrong. Evolution does not attempt to explain the origin matter or even the origin of life.

They didn't and that's my point! I don't want the fundies teaching this fucking nonsense to my son. :|

Is someone threatening to? Or are you just being unrealistically paranoid about the indoctrination of your child?

You tell me if I'm being unrealistically paranoid. These stupid "theories" popped up about 4-5 years ago and it seems that stories come up in the news more and more frequently. Hell, there's an entire theme park dedicated to this nonsense somewhere in the wasteland of this country between the east coast and the west coast.

Does it threaten your beliefs if someone disagrees with you?
 

DangerAardvark

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2004
7,559
0
0
It should be pointed out that of that percentage who believe in Creationism, only a small minority believe it literally. Most people try to fit Evolution into the Genesis version of creation. So, it's really quite remarkable to find Evolution deniers here on ATOT. Statistically that is.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,550
940
126
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
Originally posted by: uclaLabrat
because, it's probably an extremely rare occurance, simple enough to grasp...

ok, even if it's extremely rare, shouldn't we have seen it? somewhere?

no? we can't? Maybe it's a bad idea then....

Ya, because the conditions on earth today are exactly like they were some 4 billion years ago right? So obviously everything should act exactly as it did back then. And even if they weren't, we could certainly divine those conditions and conduct all the proper experiments perfectly. Because there's never a hard road, right? Well, theory disproved! :roll:

Life changes rapidly during the early years-look at the birth of a child. It wouldn't surprise me if things changed much more slowly now than they did a couple billion years ago.
 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
The Big Bang has hard scientific evidence behind it. The only problem we have is that calculating the Big Bang itself would require the unification of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, something we have not done yet

It seems as if only the effects of the Big Bang could have any hard evidence, because anything before it's effects would be resistant to scientific experimentation.

Again, if the Big Bang were feasible, why is the concept of God considered nothing more than a fairy tale?
 

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,632
3,045
136
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
Originally posted by: uclaLabrat
because, it's probably an extremely rare occurance, simple enough to grasp...

ok, even if it's extremely rare, shouldn't we have seen it? somewhere?

no? we can't? Maybe it's a bad idea then....

Ya, because the conditions on earth today are exactly like they were some 4 billion years ago right? So obviously everything should act exactly as it did back then. And even if they weren't, we could certainly divine those conditions and conduct all the proper experiments perfectly. Because there's never a hard road, right? Well, theory disproved! :roll:[/quote]
Hahaha....precisely. You think the experiments haven't been performed? Even if they succeeded, they'd do more to prove creationism than evolution.

Think about it...it takes years of grueling, difficult research to get even the most primitive of reactions to occur. Does that not point to a creation? I'm pretty sure there were no grad students back then...
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor

Look. If you're going to suggest people believe something because there are "massive" amounts of evidence you need more than one questionable example.

Go look up the scientists who doubt australopithecus. It's not just one scientist they drug up from some backwater town.
You, sir, are one of the most willfully and belligerently ignorant personages I've encountered on the internet -- and I have debated countless creationists.

Educate yourself.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

 

AbAbber2k

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
6,474
1
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Life changes rapidly during the early years-look at the birth of a child. It wouldn't surprise me if things changed much more slowly now than they did a couple billion years ago.

My quotes were all messed up. Edited them a little. But yes, I definitely believe that's a good possibility.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor

Look. If you're going to suggest people believe something because there are "massive" amounts of evidence you need more than one questionable example.

Go look up the scientists who doubt australopithecus. It's not just one scientist they drug up from some backwater town.
You, sir, are one of the most willfully and belligerently ignorant personages I've encountered on the internet -- and I have debated countless creationists.

Educate yourself.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

I don't think you've reached the 'End of the Internet' then. HeroOfPellinor can type clearly and make coherent arguments. A very large amount of the people on the Internets cannot.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,550
940
126
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
The world will be so much better when people realize both ideas can co-exist.

No, I think it would be much better if we stuck to teaching about science in our science classes instead of sky fairies.

Where did you go to school that your science teachers taught you about creationism? Sounds like more of a teacher issue than a system-wide issue.

My comments were more towards the ultra conservative Christian belief set. I think most (non-delusional) non-Christians admit that they don't know where all of the matter in the universe came from. Ultra conservative Christians tend to think evolution is the exact opposite of their beliefs, when they couldn't be more wrong. Evolution does not attempt to explain the origin matter or even the origin of life.

They didn't and that's my point! I don't want the fundies teaching this fucking nonsense to my son. :|

Is someone threatening to? Or are you just being unrealistically paranoid about the indoctrination of your child?

You tell me if I'm being unrealistically paranoid. These stupid "theories" popped up about 4-5 years ago and it seems that stories come up in the news more and more frequently. Hell, there's an entire theme park dedicated to this nonsense somewhere in the wasteland of this country between the east coast and the west coast.

Does it threaten your beliefs if someone disagrees with you?

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: pnad
I thought most of ATOT would be evolutionists. Good to see some fellow creationists here.

I could argue with them, but in the end they BELIEVE what they want to BELIEVE and I don't think any amount of debate will change that.

I have no problem with evolutionists as long as they recognize it as a belief and not a proven fact. Evolution is a theory and has not been 'proven'.

Wrong-o, but nice try. A SCIENTIFIC theory is very different than your regular old run-of-the-mill generic theory. Scientific theories are not theories. They are tested and verified hypothesis about how a particular phenomena occurs. If you'd like the layman's definition a scientific theory is a fact. Gravity, relativity, quantum mechanics, evolution are all scientific theories... meaning scientists have accepted them as the laws or rules and would only revise them if evidence comes into play that refutes them.

So, the "theory" of evolution is, in fact, the scientifically accepted reason as to how we got to where we are today. There is no 'belief' involved in evolution, unless you count belief in the scientific method.

To address your last point, nothing in science is "proven." Gravity isn't "proven." Relativity isn't "proven" and neither is evolution. NOTHING in science is proven beyond all reasonable doubt because that is impossible.

What you choose to believe is entirely up to you, but don't go around thinking that there is any doubt among scientists as to the validity of evolution.
 

dennilfloss

Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
Oct 21, 1999
30,509
12
0
dennilfloss.blogspot.com
As a paleontologist I stopped to bother debating creationists during the mid 80s when I realized we weren't talking the same language, heck using the same part of our brains. I was using arguments of science and the scientific method but their conviction is a matter of faith and literalism, not logic and evidence.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
The Big Bang has hard scientific evidence behind it. The only problem we have is that calculating the Big Bang itself would require the unification of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, something we have not done yet

It seems as if only the effects of the Big Bang could have any hard evidence, because anything before it's effects would be resistant to scientific experimentation.

Again, if the Big Bang were feasible, why is the concept of God considered nothing more than a fairy tale?

We could falsify the Big Bang, in principle. That, and Big Bang cosmology actually explains things. Theism does not.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: joshsquall

I don't think you've reached the 'End of the Internet' then. HeroOfPellinor can type clearly and make coherent arguments. A very large amount of the people on the Internets cannot.
I would agree that his sentences are coherent. His arguments... not so much.

 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
The Big Bang has hard scientific evidence behind it. The only problem we have is that calculating the Big Bang itself would require the unification of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, something we have not done yet

It seems as if only the effects of the Big Bang could have any hard evidence, because anything before it's effects would be resistant to scientific experimentation.

Again, if the Big Bang were feasible, why is the concept of God considered nothing more than a fairy tale?

We could falsify the Big Bang, in principle. That, and Big Bang cosmology actually explains things. Theism does not.

See my post above. A scientific theory must put forth a testable hypothesis. The existence of god is not testable. Therefore, the belief that God created the universe is not a valid scientific hypothesis.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
The Big Bang has hard scientific evidence behind it. The only problem we have is that calculating the Big Bang itself would require the unification of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, something we have not done yet

It seems as if only the effects of the Big Bang could have any hard evidence, because anything before it's effects would be resistant to scientific experimentation.

Again, if the Big Bang were feasible, why is the concept of God considered nothing more than a fairy tale?

We could falsify the Big Bang, in principle. That, and Big Bang cosmology actually explains things. Theism does not.

See my post above. A scientific theory must put forth a testable hypothesis. The existence of god is not testable. Therefore, the belief that God created the universe is not a valid scientific hypothesis.

Are you sure you meant to respond to me?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,550
940
126
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Life changes rapidly during the early years-look at the birth of a child. It wouldn't surprise me if things changed much more slowly now than they did a couple billion years ago.

My quotes were all messed up. Edited them a little. But yes, I definitely believe that's a good possibility.

I fixed my response.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
The Big Bang has hard scientific evidence behind it. The only problem we have is that calculating the Big Bang itself would require the unification of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, something we have not done yet

It seems as if only the effects of the Big Bang could have any hard evidence, because anything before it's effects would be resistant to scientific experimentation.

Again, if the Big Bang were feasible, why is the concept of God considered nothing more than a fairy tale?

We could falsify the Big Bang, in principle. That, and Big Bang cosmology actually explains things. Theism does not.

See my post above. A scientific theory must put forth a testable hypothesis. The existence of god is not testable. Therefore, the belief that God created the universe is not a valid scientific hypothesis.

Are you sure you meant to respond to me?

I was just sort of adding on, I guess that was confusing ;)
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,550
940
126
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.

So long as they aren't preaching it to my son in school. Still, if you ask me about it or if you ask me to have an honest conversation with you about it I'm likely to just dismiss you as a religious nutball.

I don't think the space between the east and west coast are entirely a wasteland...but quite a bit of it is. :p
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.

Actually, when the ignorant who choose to remain uneducated, who refuse to examine the facts, who ignore all of the evidence and refuse to even acknowledge its existence unless the scientific community serves it up on a silver platter for them, and who even then lack the educational background to understand the evidence presented before them and decide on the basis of their own ignorance that since they can't comprehend it, it must therefore be false - when these ignorant people meet in sufficient numbers and start dictating government policy which affects me and the future of my children, that's when it threatens my way of life.
 

thecrecarc

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2004
3,364
3
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.

So long as they aren't preaching it to my son in school. Still, if you ask me about it or if you ask me to have an honest conversation with you about it I'm likely to just dismiss you as a religious nutball.

I don't think the space between the east and west coast are entirely a wasteland...but quite a bit of it is. :p

Hey, i resent that! Minnesota FTW! :p

 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.

Actually, when the ignorant who choose to remain uneducated, who refuse to examine the facts, who ignore all of the evidence and refuse to even acknowledge its existence unless the scientific community serves it up on a silver platter for them, and who even then lack the educational background to understand the evidence presented before them and decide on the basis of their own ignorance that since they can't comprehend it, it must therefore be false - when these ignorant people meet in sufficient numbers and start dictating government policy which affects me and the future of my children, that's when it threatens my way of life.

I believe that is the longest sentence I've ever read.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

No, but I prefer that my son be raised in an environment of science. I had religion forced down my throat as a child (and not by a Catholic priest :p ) and it didn't stick with me as something I should embrace. I don't think we should be teaching religion in our schools.

Just because we recently changed religion to clash with science is enough of a reason for me to dismiss it. I went to church every week and learned about the bible when I was younger and there was none of this man and dinosaurs walked the earth together bullshit because it is utter nonsense.

You stated earlier that you were bothered by a theme park dedicated to ultra conservative Christianity and you refer to the Bible Belt as a wasteland. You seem to have more of a stake in this than "worrying about your child." For some reason you're angry that people have beliefs that don't coincide with your own. I agree that their ideas are ridiculous, but it's not like it threatens your way of life.

Actually, when the ignorant who choose to remain uneducated, who refuse to examine the facts, who ignore all of the evidence and refuse to even acknowledge its existence unless the scientific community serves it up on a silver platter for them, and who even then lack the educational background to understand the evidence presented before them and decide on the basis of their own ignorance that since they can't comprehend it, it must therefore be false - when these ignorant people meet in sufficient numbers and start dictating government policy which affects me and the future of my children, that's when it threatens my way of life.

I believe that is the longest sentence I've ever read.

then you've got some work ahead of you...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_English_sentence
 

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
At least evolutionary therory has a premise based on carbondating. The bibles primary source is 'the septuagent'.

Hm

Rogo