Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: JoeKing
The whole argument rests on the idea that "things are just a little too perfect". That our form of life is the only kind out there. That's pretty shallow thinking, lazy even, on the part of the cosmologist (how the hell do these people get those jobs? I'd like to be one and just sit around all day postulating). Life would have evolved from whatever matter is available.
The story behind this bizarre suggestion began with a vexatious question: why is the universe so bio-friendly? Cosmologists have long been perplexed by the fact that the laws of nature seem to be cunningly concocted to enable life to emerge. Take the element carbon, the vital stuff that is the basis of all life. It wasn't made in the big bang that gave birth to the universe. Instead, carbon has been cooked in the innards of giant stars, which then exploded and spewed soot around the universe.
Conditions aren't friendly so life could evolve.
Life evolved because the conditions were friendly.
It was chance that probably led to these exact conditions, and suprisingly, what developed just happened to rely on those conditions.
Duh!
The universe was concocted for life? Yeah, right. Life came about because of the way the universe was concocted, IMO. Different universe, different (or no) life.