They dont sell this car because nobody wants it. How many people drive a ford fiesta?
It seems people have no idea how expensive it is to make a diesel vehicle here in America. All the stuff to make it emissions legal is very expensive. It's why you only see diesel on higher end brands like VW or Audi and you're going to pay thousands more for that diesel engine. It's going to be minimum $3,000 on top of the normal price. You'd have to be retarded to pay that on a Fiesta. The base Fiesta already gets good mileage.
High school friend had a Chevy Sprint (basically the same size). Sure it was a death trap but we loved how cheap it was to operate. Pick everyone up and let's go eat at Red Lobster or some other place that is outside of walking distance!yup people talk big, but they speak with their wallets. remember the geo metro? 58mpg in 1989
something is wrong that you think VW is a "higher end brand".
Coronation Street is the most watched programme on British television but this does not make it the best. Spain is the most popular foreign holiday destination for Brits yet I can assure you that Spain is very probably the nastiest country on earth; a place where they think it's a hoot to stick spears in cows, where they can't cook and they can't make wine. Also, lisping can be an endearing trait but not when everyone is doing it.
No, something may well be popular but that does not necessarily make it good. I mean, there have been periods in history when genocide was all the rage. And that brings me neatly on to the great diesel debate. Those who purvey derv-drinking cars point out, noisily, that one car in five sold in Britain now runs around on a diet of diesel. And then, with a contented sigh, they sit back, belly puffed out and hands steepled behind their heads. For years, they have been telling us that diesel is clean and cheap and that diesel cars are efficient. Right now, they are feeling vindicated and worthy because at last, people are queuing up to buy cars that run on the fuel of the future'.
"The diesel lobby argues that petrol contains fumes that will kill us all. This is nonsense"
Well, it isn't. Diesel has only two places in current society: under the bonnet of something with six axles and a tattooed arm sticking out of the window, or in a tractor. Providing, of course, the taxpayer does not end up paying the farmer to use it, which we do. But then again, we also pay for his car, his wife's new coat, his children's education and all his restaurant bills so I guess a drop of derv every now and again is small bacon.
Diesel-powered cars are an absolute and complete waste of everybody's afternoon. First, despite what everyone says, they are a lot slower than their petrol-driven counterparts. They often cost more to buy and, if you actually do your sums, you will find that in many cases you need to do upwards of 50,000 miles before the savings start. Get this: when you've done 100,000 miles, you will be better off to the tune of £100. I lose that kind of money down the back of my sofa every time the film gets exciting.
And how much fun will you have had with your diesel as those long, tedious, and noisy miles roll by? None. On hills, you will have been able to watch the trees grow. And then die, as the smoke from your exhaust suffocates them.
At night, your neighbours, fed up with being woken up every morning by what sounds like a washing machine full of house bricks, will sneak out and urinate through your letter box. And rightly so.
At every traffic light you will have had all your fillings shaken loose by the vibrations and you will not have been able to call your dentist either because the constant wobbling will have broken your carphone.
The diesel lobby argues that petrol contains fumes that will kill us all. This is nonsense. Open the bonnet of, say, a Saab Aero and you will find geraniums and honeysuckle on the cylinder heads. Open the bonnet of a diesel and you will find a lot of soot and some dead rats.
Diesel engines chuck out black, oily smoke. I'm sorry, but there is no way that I'll be convinced this is good for us. I am not allowed to smoke in aeroplanes, tube trains, restaurants, cinemas and even this office, so why should your car be allowed to smoke on the road? It shouldn't. Get rid of it, get a life and buy a Dodge Viper instead.
They dont sell this car because nobody wants it. How many people drive a ford fiesta?
Fiesta has been doing really well.
http://www.windsorstar.com/cars/Ford+sales+leader+North+America/4549043/story.html
"
In Canada, Ford retained its crown as No. 1 automaker with sales rising 16 per cent in March compared to the same period last year, the automaker said Friday.
Fuelled by demand for the Ford Fiesta subcompact, car sales rose 31 per cent, while light truck sales increased 12 per cent, Ford said."
 
	VW is a "higher end brand" that also sells a few affordable models.. They're comparable to Audi in their offerings (yes, I know it's the same company).
Anyway, back to the issue at hand, our good British friend Jeremy Clarkson sums up diesels very well:
http://www.topgear.com/uk/jeremy-clarkson/clarkson-diesel-11-1993
I would totally buy the car are you kidding? Almost twice the gas mileage for 3k on top? Yeah I'm down. I'll make that 3k up in gas over the life of the loan.
Is that an article from 1993?
Modern diesels are nothing like ones in the W126s.
I think you missed the posts where people pointed out that the Daily Tech's math was wrong. That 80 mpg claim uses two things which make it so it doesn't compare with US ratings:
1. They're using imperial gallons which are larger than US gallons
2. They're using the EU cycle which routinely gives much better efficiencies than the EPA cycle.
If you convert that 80 mpg claim to US gallons you end up with 67 mpg on the EU cycle. Converting it to the US cycle isn't clear cut but from some of the other examples can be used to estimate it. From what I could find it would make this car get 53 mpg on the US cycle using US gallons.
I would totally buy the car are you kidding? Almost twice the gas mileage for 3k on top? Yeah I'm down. I'll make that 3k up in gas over the life of the loan.
Diesels suck. They sound terrible, they have no torque, they tend to be hard to start in cold weather, the fuel stinks to high heaven...do not want.
I have to fucking admit...I would fucking buy that.
You guys keep telling me the EU cycle gives much better efficiency ratings than the EPA cycle, but I haven't really seen that when looking it up. Looks pretty damn close to the same thing.
Fucking word man. Fucking word.
Iirc, one of the previous barriers was that most Euro diesel engines passed Euro standards but not ours -- there was one particulate that we prohibited at a stricter level. This may have changed just recently, but it was a previous factor.
Edit: It's nitrous oxide which we are stricter about. This is the best I could come up with doing a quick and dirty search:
I know the biodiesel industry is tanking due to loss of annual subsidies, but wouldn't this help re-invigorate that sector?
I assume biodiesel is quite clean, no?
you can pretty much make it in your basement...
so basically bullshit regulations which were probably put in place to protect American car companies like Ford?
a few companies like BMW & Merc have put out new diesels recently and made them 50-state compliant. Together with eco-credits, they are selling well. Ford probably just thinks it's not worth the effort ($ / time) to go through that. Profit for them may be low here.
so basically bullshit regulations which were probably put in place to protect American car companies like Ford?
There is a fix for this already being made in the USA and sold to Ford and GM for their diesel engines in the trucks. by Robert Bosch LLC.
It is call D'NOX which is an injection system built in to remove these emissions.
http://www.cdti.com/content/products/aris/ureainjection.htm

 
				
		