yeah, having one kidney will function sufficely for sometime. But ultimately the increased load will cause it to lose function at a higher rate than if the filtering load was shared by two.
Even if that was the case, it would still be to slow for it to matter.
People can function with kidneys only working with little more 10% of normal capacity.
To even be considered for a transplant function has to drop below ~15%.
A liver grows back. A kidney does not.
yeah, having one kidney will function sufficely for sometime. But ultimately the increased load will cause it to lose function at a higher rate than if the filtering load was shared by two.
So wrong that it's not even funny.
LoL, pls explain to me how that is wrong
The increased load does not wear out your kidney faster and there are absolutely no studies that show having one kidney shortens your lifespan or that the remaining kidney loses function quicker. The only reason you have two is a failsafe.
If you eat right, keep your blood pressure regulated, exercise and don't smoke, your risk of kidney disease is low. Load has nothing to do with kidney longevity.
I would for a few million dollars.But, what if said stranger offered a large sum of money for your kidney? Would it change your mind? I think I would still say no.
T
To support my argument with numbers:
We have about a million glomeruli (what the kidney utilizes to filter out waste) in a kidney. We lose about 100,000 of these each decade regardless of load. You can live with no symptoms and normally with about 20% (200,000 glomeruli) of what we start with. Well, that puts you at 80 years old, when you are at the low end of what you need to live normally.
The increased load does not wear out your kidney faster and there are absolutely no studies that show having one kidney shortens your lifespan or that the remaining kidney loses function quicker. The only reason you have two is a failsafe.
If you eat right, keep your blood pressure regulated, exercise and don't smoke, your risk of kidney disease is low. Load has nothing to do with kidney longevity.
To support my argument with numbers:
We have about a million glomeruli (what the kidney utilizes to filter out waste) in a kidney. We lose about 100,000 of these each decade regardless of load. You can live with no symptoms and normally with about 20% (200,000 glomeruli) of what we start with. Well, that puts you at 80 years old, when you are at the low end of what you need to live normally.