Originally posted by: Special K
Sooner or later, someone is going to come in here and say "All you guys who answer no are shallow and only care about sex, blah blah..."
😉
Originally posted by: Mo0o
I'd be their friend but not date them.
1. If you're looking for long term, well there's not really a long term
2. If you're looking for a fling, theres much safer flings out there
Originally posted by: hungfarover
no fvcking way
Originally posted by: Flyback
Originally posted by: Izusaga
Err, no. This is almost similar to the HSV-1 polls, except with HSV-1 80% of the population already has it, and out of those 80% only 20% show symptoms.
Sure, neither have a cure.. but with HIV+, you friggen die.
Thats like playing Russian Roulette.
Thats exactly why I posted this (due to the HSV-1 thread). It made me wonder how much a negative assocation HIV has with most people. HIV is very much looked down on (death part of AIDS aside--its just not accepted much by mainstream society as something less than what slvts/manwhores, africans and homosexuals have), whereas something like HSV-1 is even more easily transmitted but due to its mainstream popularity people think nothing of it (because it is likely they have it 😉).
Keep in mind people, I asked if the dangers of catching it were more or less neutralized would you date the person (and they were healthy, ala Magic Johnson).
Originally posted by: buck
Is school on break or something?
I don't know if you're joking, but this reflects my sentiments (minus the winking smiley). If I found someone who was perfect for me (e.g. same sense of humor, similar interests, affectionate, etc.) but we couldn't have sex, I would still have a relationship with them.Originally posted by: HamSupLo
Sure, a relationship shouldn't be based entirely on sex, you know 😉
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
It sounds bad...but I would have a really realyl hard time dating someone with aids....it would depend tho.