igor_kavinski
Lifer
- Jul 27, 2020
- 28,175
- 19,194
- 146
I hope he doesn't connect to the internet with that: https://www.tomshardware.com/softwa...iruses-within-minutes-of-being-exposed-onlineas a winXP box.
I hope he doesn't connect to the internet with that: https://www.tomshardware.com/softwa...iruses-within-minutes-of-being-exposed-onlineas a winXP box.
I hope he doesn't connect to the internet with that: https://www.tomshardware.com/softwa...iruses-within-minutes-of-being-exposed-online
Probably protected by the host OS's firewall.Weird, because I have Win2k and XP VMs and they haven't gone kablooey.
So bad they cancelled it's successor!I added Raptor Lake to the poll.OP has not logged in in over 4yrs. Someone had to do it.
He doesn’t, but to drive home how much he worries (needlessly) about getting hacked let me share this story.I hope he doesn't connect to the internet with that: https://www.tomshardware.com/softwa...iruses-within-minutes-of-being-exposed-online
Is that the Lynnfield? Or was the real one the i5 750? I installed win11 on my old one that my son still has lol.Mkay, not really a counterargument, more of a "but I still think I'm right" response. Anyone running a performance-oriented x86 CPU without a HSF rightly deserves a slap upside the head. There's going to be some unfortunate fringe cases for sure back in that CPU gen's day, but since there are always unfortunate "I killed some hardware" fringe cases through say running a CPU without a properly-installed heatsink, I'm failing to see how remarkable this is. For example, while I've never killed a CPU or board where the pins are in the CPU board socket, plenty of people have. I don't think that's great design either, and yet both AMD and Intel are doing it these days. All we can do is try to install the CPU gently, and pray silently that we're not being too forceful when installing the HSF (if that can actually damage the CPU socket pins, no idea!).
If the point (if there's really any point at all in this) was to come up with a top 50-100 bad CPUs list then there are going to be some very unexciting entries. 5 at most IMO, then at least each one's story is worth telling (at least as far as fellow nerds are concerned).
If you want another thoroughly unexciting entry, then the next time I visit the customer in question, I'll take down the specs of their first-gen Intel i5 CPU which (if I have the model number correct from memory) does not show up on Google: the Intel desktop i5-720, which had the honour of being the only desktop i5 with only two processor cores, and I think it was a lemon that HP wanted, presumably to hoodwink their customers into thinking they were getting a better-than-average processor.
French speaking community called those presqu'HOT which means "almost hot" which they weren't of course, they were, extremely hot for their time.Just an FYI on the P4 Prescott. I gave my FIL my circa 2004 P4 3.2E Prescott system. It’s still functional 20 years later as a winXP box.
I believe cases like this became necessary for P4's:French speaking community called those presqu'HOT which means "almost hot" which they weren't of course, they were, extremely hot for their time.
Is that the Lynnfield? Or was the real one the i5 750? I installed win11 on my old one that my son still has lol.
Probably protected by the host OS's firewall.
He does say "unsecured" internet and he goes and turns off the Windows XP firewall.Which would make that guy's story all the stranger.
He does say "unsecured" internet and he goes and turns off the Windows XP firewall.
Let's wait for an update from Paratus thenso why on earth would such a scenario be a useful test of WinXP's security?
Let's wait for an update from Paratus then![]()
And now it seems cool running and quiet compared to modern Intel CPUs!Just an FYI on the P4 Prescott. I gave my FIL my circa 2004 P4 3.2E Prescott system. It’s still functional 20 years later as a winXP box.
I run an XP SP3 32bit box with not exactly period hardware (Haswell Pentium, 4GB and a GTS450) and haven't run into any issues with it on the occasions I've connected it to the internet with just basic security. It really seems like the gentleman was doing everything possible there to ensure the systems got compromised short of installing viruses himself.
And now it seems cool running and quiet compared to modern Intel CPUs!
Yes! So Intel owes us a Tejas shrink!And now it seems cool running and quiet compared to modern Intel CPUs!
Dang, you are tempting me to relive the good ole days nowI have a customer who ran XP on his ~2005 era Dell box (the only computer in the house) until January 2022, and the only reason he stopped was because his utility company's recently revised account page wouldn't load properly on Firefox 52 ESR![]()
And that burning smell of metal is not that bad. You get used to it and kinda miss it when using Ryzens and Epycs. I certainly do when my Epyc 128 thread CPU is running cool and quiet at full load. I'm like, what's wrong with it??? How can it possibly do that? Maybe something's not right! And then I see that it's consuming max 230W on a cooler rated for 400W...Oh, yeah those bursts to 150w or 200w to hit 5.8ghz+ are just little small bursts of power and heat. It will dissipate easily and heat your home in the winter!
1. Intel iAPX 432
2. Intel 80286
3. IBM PowerPC 970
Honorable mention: Intel Itanium for removing Alpha and PA-RISC from the market (although that makes it a pretty good CPU for Intel).
I notice you recently added "Raptor Lake".
You'll probably lose that fight at 90% of companies out there. Win7 isn't getting security updates anymore and while the system itself might run rock solid IT isn't going to take it kindly if some unpatched vulnerability in Win7 it the path that gets used to launch a ransomware attack on your corporate network.Dang, you are tempting me to relive the good ole days now
On a related note, my idiot IT admin (who thinks formatting is the best solution) is trying to forcefully retire my trusty old i5-2400 work PC running Windows 7 that's been issue free for at least 14 years now. I will probably lose this battle and then I'll be out of a job soon because I don't see any point in accepting things for which there is no proper justification given. I would rather not work in a stupid organization like that.
Doesn't perturb me. If I have to start over with a fresh PC, might as well do that in a new workplace.You'll probably lose that fight at 90% of companies out there.