"Women the Truth"

[gigapet]

i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

 

[xeno2060]

Broad Generalization or a Generalization about Broads😀

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: PingSpike
I agree with many of the sentiments expressed, although I think his view is probably a bit skewed because the only women he's had success with were in fact trash. What loyal wife or girlfriend is going to be hanging out at a bar all the damn time ready for him to hit on? Not many.

he never said he was only picking up women at a bar. This guy mastered picking up women in any venue they exist. Daytime, Nightime its irrelevant where he finds them as the formula for his success does not change. IOW, its a wild assumption that all the women whom he seduces are trash.

 

[Zanix]

This man uses his superpowers for evil.


Women may not have honor, but he even said that men do.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Anyone who would actually be like that in real life, has got to be the real deal, as far as sex addicts are concerned. (not a cool thing, btw)

reading comprehension issues abound in this thread. He is not a nympho, laying all those women was a result of him learning this skillset of dealing with women not him trying to fill a void. Now he has multiple healthy long term relationships with desirable women to which he has both a emotional connection and sexual.

 

[Doboji]

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

 

[Doboji]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Anyone who would actually be like that in real life, has got to be the real deal, as far as sex addicts are concerned. (not a cool thing, btw)

reading comprehension issues abound in this thread. He is not a nympho, laying all those women was a result of him learning this skillset of dealing with women not him trying to fill a void. Now he has multiple healthy long term relationships with desirable women to which he has both a emotional connection and sexual.

You're naive, 99% of people cannot have healthy long term relationships with multiple women.

It just doesnt work that way.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

IMO, its just my opinion now....humans like the majority of animals are instinctively drawn towards having multiple partners in there lives and it is only societies imposed artificial restrictions that have tried to subvert that natural instinct. With that said, personally, I think the only thing better than having a deep emotional and physical connection to one female is having that same connection to multiple females. My Love is unlimited in supply.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Anyone who would actually be like that in real life, has got to be the real deal, as far as sex addicts are concerned. (not a cool thing, btw)

reading comprehension issues abound in this thread. He is not a nympho, laying all those women was a result of him learning this skillset of dealing with women not him trying to fill a void. Now he has multiple healthy long term relationships with desirable women to which he has both a emotional connection and sexual.

You're naive, 99% of people cannot have healthy long term relationships with multiple women.

It just doesnt work that way.

This is not the case in all cultures, however you are correct american men are pussified from the day they are born to the point that the possiblity of connecting with more than one woman is not considered a possiblity this becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.

 

[lokiju]

:laugh: My fiancee asked me yetsterday "why does your mother think the way she does?" and I replied with "because she's a female, just like you"



She didn't find it funny, but it's true, she was critzing the way my Mom acted with something yet she does the same exact shyte herself all the time.

😛

 

[Doboji]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

IMO, its just my opinion now....humans like the majority of animals are instinctively drawn towards having multiple partners in there lives and it is only societies imposed artificial restrictions that have tried to subvert that natural instinct. With that said, personally, I think the only thing better than having a deep emotional and physical connection to one female is having that same connection to multiple females. My Love is unlimited in supply.

Well you sound like that 1%... my relationship is way too deep, and requires way too much time, and sharing to be spread to multiple people. I also disagree with the multiple partners concept.... first of all there are animals such as gorillas and wolves who mate for life. I think Human's do mate for life, with exceptions.... sure the divorce rate is 50%... but that still means that 50% of people stay married for life. I'd say that's pretty significant wouldnt you?

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

IMO, its just my opinion now....humans like the majority of animals are instinctively drawn towards having multiple partners in there lives and it is only societies imposed artificial restrictions that have tried to subvert that natural instinct. With that said, personally, I think the only thing better than having a deep emotional and physical connection to one female is having that same connection to multiple females. My Love is unlimited in supply.

Well you sound like that 1%... my relationship is way too deep, and requires way too much time, and sharing to be spread to multiple people. I also disagree with the multiple partners concept.... first of all there are animals such as gorillas and wolves who mate for life. I think Human's do mate for life, with exceptions.... sure the divorce rate is 50%... but that still means that 50% of people stay married for life. I'd say that's pretty significant wouldnt you?

the concept of one partner for life is new in the human species. that said...50% divorce rate is high and the rate of those marriages wwhere at least one partner is unfaithful is even HIGHER!

 

[Doboji]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Anyone who would actually be like that in real life, has got to be the real deal, as far as sex addicts are concerned. (not a cool thing, btw)

reading comprehension issues abound in this thread. He is not a nympho, laying all those women was a result of him learning this skillset of dealing with women not him trying to fill a void. Now he has multiple healthy long term relationships with desirable women to which he has both a emotional connection and sexual.

You're naive, 99% of people cannot have healthy long term relationships with multiple women.

It just doesnt work that way.

This is not the case in all cultures, however you are correct american men are pussified from the day they are born to the point that the possiblity of connecting with more than one woman is not considered a possiblity this becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.

This is nonsense... marriage is a consistent concept that spans the entire globe in every single culture. Even societies that allow for multiple wives have a concept of 1st and 2nd wives. Infidelity is a universally despised sin, some cultures attempt to allow for it on some level, but all see it at the very least as undesireable.

You are the exception my friend, not the rule. I respect your opinion, and I'm sure for you, your way of living is wonderful and fulfilling. However for myself, and the majority of society... it isnt.

-Max

 

[Doboji]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

IMO, its just my opinion now....humans like the majority of animals are instinctively drawn towards having multiple partners in there lives and it is only societies imposed artificial restrictions that have tried to subvert that natural instinct. With that said, personally, I think the only thing better than having a deep emotional and physical connection to one female is having that same connection to multiple females. My Love is unlimited in supply.

Well you sound like that 1%... my relationship is way too deep, and requires way too much time, and sharing to be spread to multiple people. I also disagree with the multiple partners concept.... first of all there are animals such as gorillas and wolves who mate for life. I think Human's do mate for life, with exceptions.... sure the divorce rate is 50%... but that still means that 50% of people stay married for life. I'd say that's pretty significant wouldnt you?

the concept of one partner for life is new in the human species. that said...50% divorce rate is high and the rate of those marriages wwhere at least one partner is unfaithful is even HIGHER!

What makes you think this is a new concept? The old testament of the bible is some 3000 years old, and the partner for life concept is in there... there is archieological evidence of the concept, way way before that even.

 

[Peetoeng]

Originally posted by: gigapet


This is not the case in all cultures, however you are correct american men are pussified from the day they are born to the point that the possiblity of connecting with more than one woman is not considered a possiblity this becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.

Then, name some cultures!

I grew up in a country in which polygamy was legal. Majority of the cases were for folks living in agricultural villages. In most cases, the husband would seek a younger wife every few years and divorce an older one. Bickering and fighting were common among wives, even when their husband was very wealthy and afford each of his wives a very comfortable lifestyle.

"Healthy long-term relationship"? I think not.

And how would this "relationship" affect their children? Isn't it reasonable that he should be accountable to the welfare, physically and mentally, of his children?

As Jack Nicholson's character says in As Good as it Gets, he who does not have reason and accountability is a pvssy.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Anyone who would actually be like that in real life, has got to be the real deal, as far as sex addicts are concerned. (not a cool thing, btw)

reading comprehension issues abound in this thread. He is not a nympho, laying all those women was a result of him learning this skillset of dealing with women not him trying to fill a void. Now he has multiple healthy long term relationships with desirable women to which he has both a emotional connection and sexual.

You're naive, 99% of people cannot have healthy long term relationships with multiple women.

It just doesnt work that way.

This is not the case in all cultures, however you are correct american men are pussified from the day they are born to the point that the possiblity of connecting with more than one woman is not considered a possiblity this becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.

This is nonsense... marriage is a consistent concept that spans the entire globe in every single culture. Even societies that allow for multiple wives have a concept of 1st and 2nd wives. Infidelity is a universally despised sin, some cultures attempt to allow for it on some level, but all see it at the very least as undesireable.

You are the exception my friend, not the rule. I respect your opinion, and I'm sure for you, your way of living is wonderful and fulfilling. However for myself, and the majority of society... it isnt.

-Max

I agree marriage is a universal concept today. However the extra-marital affairs and relationships have been in existence since the concept of marriage.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Peetoeng

Originally posted by: gigapet


This is not the case in all cultures, however you are correct american men are pussified from the day they are born to the point that the possiblity of connecting with more than one woman is not considered a possiblity this becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.

Then, name some cultures!

I grew up in a country in which polygamy was legal. Majority of the cases were for folks living in agricultural villages. In most cases, the husband would seek a younger wife every few years and divorce an older one. Bickering and fighting were common among wives, even when their husband was very wealthy and afford each of his wives a very comfortable lifestyle.

"Healthy long-term relationship"? I think not.

And how would this "relationship" affect their children? Isn't it reasonable that he should be accountable to the welfare, physically and mentally, of his children?

As Jack Nicholson's character says in As Good as it Gets, he who does not have reason and accountability is a pvssy.

we are not talking about children on families. dont change teh subject.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Doboji

Originally posted by: gigapet
i read this years ago on a seduction website forum

it was written by a prominent pick up artist in the seduction community and its represents precisely what is possible and what is reality when you have the skillset of attracting and seducing women.

Im not surprised msot of you do not buy into any of what it says as his reality is so extremely different than the way you currently percieve as what is possible in your own realities.

It's not a question of possibility. I understand and have experienced it's "possibility". It's a question as to whether it's emotionally healthy, worthwhile, or even that great while it's happening.

-Max

IMO, its just my opinion now....humans like the majority of animals are instinctively drawn towards having multiple partners in there lives and it is only societies imposed artificial restrictions that have tried to subvert that natural instinct. With that said, personally, I think the only thing better than having a deep emotional and physical connection to one female is having that same connection to multiple females. My Love is unlimited in supply.

Well you sound like that 1%... my relationship is way too deep, and requires way too much time, and sharing to be spread to multiple people. I also disagree with the multiple partners concept.... first of all there are animals such as gorillas and wolves who mate for life. I think Human's do mate for life, with exceptions.... sure the divorce rate is 50%... but that still means that 50% of people stay married for life. I'd say that's pretty significant wouldnt you?

the concept of one partner for life is new in the human species. that said...50% divorce rate is high and the rate of those marriages wwhere at least one partner is unfaithful is even HIGHER!

What makes you think this is a new concept? The old testament of the bible is some 3000 years old, and the partner for life concept is in there... there is archieological evidence of the concept, way way before that even.

again tthe point is that extra-marital affairs and relationships is a concept that is just as old as marriage!!! in tribal times there was marriage you are right but there is a second part to that. The villiage alpha male would have his chocie of all the women beccause they were attracted to his dominance and he was desirable in terms of reproduction, however they would not become his wife because he was not a good provider in that he would not stick around and help raise the child. This is why often times today and even tens of thousands of years ago the beta males end up marrying women because women see them as good providers in terms of helping to raise a child but not necessarily desirable in terms of reproduction. Thus the beta males often end up raising the children that are not their own!

Edit: the old testament is still Modern times in terms of human history which spans hundreds of thousands of years.

 

[PingSpike]

The good part about the olden times for beta males though was you could murder the alpha male in his sleep after he fvcked your wife and probably get away with it. Or if you were less violent, just run off into the woods and leave your cheating wife and her bastard children to fend for themselves.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: PingSpike
The good part about the olden times for beta males though was you could murder the alpha male in his sleep after he fvcked your wife and probably get away with it. Or if you were less violent, just run off into the woods and leave your cheating wife and her bastard children to fend for themselves.

These days its jail, garnished wages, alimony and child support that keep marriages together. hahaha

 

[DaShen]

That guy is a douche. I mean, he even count up how many women he sleeps with, all the while saying he isn't a mysogynist.

I can rarely expect a woman to regard her own promises as more important and compelling to her than the emotions she feels in the moment. She will rationalize it to herself later.

This is very true though.

women lose interest if you take them seriously!!!

Don't know, or want to believe this is true.

They get uneasy if you are too perfect.

Pretty true. Most of them like drama.

Make sure she gets the feeling that you have standards and that you are judging her based on them.

This guy makes it sound like you shouldn't have standards other than if they are pretty :roll: Again I reference my first response.

Take responsibility for every escalation. A woman will do just about anything as long as she doesn't have to feel like it was "her fault." Make it YOUR fault. Make it "just happen." She will rationalize it to herself later

This is surprisingly true. Pisses the heck out of me. That is the one main reason I like being single right now.

because your own self beliefs for some reason will automatically 'impart' to the anyone you interact with

FIXED. Whatever your self beliefs are get reflected in what you do and how you treat others. If you are too into yourself, other will perceive you as cocky. If you view yourself as successful, you will treat others in a way where they will see you as successful as well.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: DaShen
That guy is a douche. I mean, he even count up how many women he sleeps with, all the while saying he isn't a mysogynist.

the definition of a mysogynist cuz apparently you dont know it is: "One who hates women."

He has spent more time than you can ever hope to conversing with and taking interest in the opposite sex. He explicitly states he enjoys multiple longterm relationships with women. He enjoys them so much that he dedicated several years of his life to mastering the skillset of dealing with them. He is the opposite of the mysogynist.

And the rest of your comments are what I would expect from someone like you...close minded and living life according to a slew of irrational self limiting beliefs

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: lokiju
:laugh: My fiancee asked me yetsterday "why does your mother think the way she does?" and I replied with "because she's a female, just like you"



She didn't find it funny, but it's true, she was critzing the way my Mom acted with something yet she does the same exact shyte herself all the time.

😛

LOL I've had that same back-and-forth with my wife, except it was her mom, not mine.

"My mom will never take ownership of things that are obviously her fault. Why is that?"
"Beats me, but if you figure it out feel free to apply the solution to yourself."

I got a kick out of it but she was P.I.S.S.E.D.

 

[Nocturnal]

I stopped reading after he said he was a sexual god. LOLOLOL ninja PLEASE.

 

[GTaudiophile]

This guy is just a whore. Not the type of "man" I can relate to. So I don't give a damned what he feels about women...his testing methods are wrong.