Woman in combat

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by rudder, Jan 24, 2013.

  1. rudder

    rudder Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    19,134
    Likes Received:
    8
    Surprised this has not been discussed yet. So Leon Panetta gave the go ahead for women to join front line infantry units. Obviously women serving now have seen combat, but this is a new level.

    Is this good or bad? I was PDQed when I joined the Army years ago... so other than my 3 days at the processing centers I haven't been in a combat unit.

    Overall I think there are probably some women who are physically capable. But I am not really for this new rule. I think the numbers of women desiring to be in the role is probably pretty small. The military is probably looking at a big expense to integrate this small number of female soldiers into combat units.

    Interested to hear the thoughts of others. Is it about time or is this just political correctness run rampant.
     
  2. nehalem256

    nehalem256 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    1
    Require that all women who want to serve in combat units be required to go through the exact same training as men and meet all the same physical requirements.

    This should hopefully mitigate most costs in integrating the units and ensure there is little/no loss in combat effectiveness.

    Also, pregnancy in women in combat units should not be tolerated.
     
  3. Brainonska511

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    17,753
    Likes Received:
    24
    As long as they are physically capable, I see no problem with it.

    Now they just have to get the selective service rules changed so that everyone has to sign up.
     
  4. Genx87

    Genx87 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2002
    Messages:
    39,503
    Likes Received:
    12
    I have a couple of issues with it.

    A. The idea of a woman being captured is a nightmare scenario imo
    B. If we can get past the above issue. Let them pass the standard PT test. No lowering the bar for equality. If a woman can pass that and the same basic training as a man. Then welcome to combat. Otherwise if we lower the bar all we are doing is putting woman into situations they cant possibly hope to win. And that will get people killed.
     
  5. Brainonska511

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    17,753
    Likes Received:
    24
    Torture is torture, regardless of whether it is against men or women.
     
  6. Incorruptible

    Incorruptible Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    9,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why did they make this decision now? panetta is somewhat an extremist and I am curious whats his motive for this

    If women are to be in combat then they must face the same requirements as men

    What would happen if they get captured? Numerous women soldiers have been raped and faced terrible abuse from captors

    There is a reason why most other countries dont allow them in combat
     
  7. Genx87

    Genx87 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2002
    Messages:
    39,503
    Likes Received:
    12
    It is but lets be honest with ourselves. The idea of a woman being tortured or raped will generate more outrage than a man.
     
  8. Brainonska511

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    17,753
    Likes Received:
    24
    I certainly agree with that. I just don't think it's a valid reason to keep physically and mentally capable women out of combat roles though.
     
  9. Moonbeam

    Moonbeam Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 1999
    Messages:
    57,823
    Likes Received:
    21
    #9 Moonbeam, Jan 24, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2013
  10. Gunslinger08

    Gunslinger08 Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2001
    Messages:
    13,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can definitely see both sides on this. Women want and have equality in most things, so why not allow them to be in front line infantry units? I do think they need to be able to pass the exact same physical tests that men do. The few real issues I see are:
    1. Quarters. You'll have to have separate barracks and facilities for females. I'm sure this is already worked out with existing female soldiers, so not a big deal.
    2. Pregnancy. I don't think a pregnant woman needs to be on the front line. This is a distraction and the nature of this unit could result in miscarriages.
    3. Chivalry. Men will do some dumb emotional crap for women that they wouldn't do for men. I could definitely see male squad mates making poor decisions based on wanting to "save the girl."

    I think you could mitigate most of these by making female only units, though I'm not sure you'd be able to sell that as PC. Female only units would all bunk together, have a somewhat reduced chance of pregnancy, and have a lower chance of crazy decisions based on male gallantry.
     
  11. nehalem256

    nehalem256 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    1
    I honestly don't know why pregnancy is allowed in the military in general.

    But it certainly has no place in combat units.
     
  12. Nintendesert

    Nintendesert Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Fine. Then we need to hold women to the same standards as men. The exact same standards.

    Right now we have weakened physical standards and lowered the bar to keep women in the service along with promoting them. When the PT standards start getting too close to the men's standards we find that women don't do very well with the exception of a few outliers.

    So are we going to hold women accountable or are we just going to let them slither up the ranks like we have been? I'm guessing women will continue to slime their way along.

    This is a problem with women simply being in the military. Easier PT standards created to give women a boost over men that are held to a higher standard.

    Now we get to actual frontline combat. So lowering standards for women that can't hack it no longer just affects someone getting promoted, now it's going to result in potentially someone getting killed. * that.

    Same exact physical standards as men across the board or just simply get the * out and do something else.
     
  13. sigurros81

    sigurros81 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    0
    If certain female soldiers want to be in a combat unit and is physically and mentally capable, then by all means.

    However, I don't want to use hyperboles to discard their effectiveness, but I just hope they are willing to go all the way when it comes to combat. What if a woman, in all her motherly love, hesitate to put a bullet in an enemy combatant and risk her squadmates lives, I'd have a problem with that. But you can argue the same thing for men. I also find that women are more emotionally based when it comes to decision making, so I don't know how that will play out during combat.
     
  14. Geosurface

    Geosurface Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    5,778
    Likes Received:
    1
    If we were still a sane nation I'd say * no to this, men and women are different and denying that is silly.

    Since we've already done so many things that screw men over since the 60's, particularly in custody, divorce court, societal expectations, the draft, etc etc... I'm actually currently in favor of this. It's about time feminism starts to be about more than just getting the good stuff, and ignoring the bad.
     
  15. Nintendesert

    Nintendesert Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Sign their asses up for the draft too.
     
  16. s0me0nesmind1

    s0me0nesmind1 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    5,877
    Likes Received:
    9
    I really don't care. I don't have all that gushy "women only as medics" type of thought. If they want to get shot so be it. I do however, find it incredibly stupid. Women are naturally weaker than men. I agree with the poster that said let them go through the same restrictions/training as males. If they can't do it, then GTFO. Women don't produce anywhere near the testosterone to have muscles capable of carrying 200lbs in a desert for miles. But hey - women are fans of denial, so whatever.

    HOWEVER, it is in basic male human instinct to protect females, even if it involves almost suicide-esque actions. I can see this being a problem, though I'm not one to judge it.
     
  17. CitizenKain

    CitizenKain Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2000
    Messages:
    4,449
    Likes Received:
    5
    Awww, sounds like someone was a fuckup in the service and found a way to blame women.
     
  18. cwjerome

    cwjerome Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no problem with it, as long as they can meet the same requirements. As a practical matter, if a woman can meet all those requirements then I'd suggest putting her in one of the 5 special forces groups. If she can meet everything then she's one hell of a female and would probably fit in better with with the heightened maturity and resources of a group rather than your typical infantry unit.
     
  19. Nintendesert

    Nintendesert Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2


    Sorry, not even close. I'm well decorated and was promoted faster than my peers. It however is a fact that men in the military have to deal with. You would know nothing about that however.
     
  20. CitizenKain

    CitizenKain Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2000
    Messages:
    4,449
    Likes Received:
    5
    Apparently "not raping women" is something a lot of them have issues with.
     
  21. Oldgamer

    Oldgamer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,280
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that it will be the next step. Honestly there is no reason not to, men and women should both be drafted in my opinion.
     
  22. s0me0nesmind1

    s0me0nesmind1 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    5,877
    Likes Received:
    9
    Something tells me feminism will get butt-hurt and then openly contradict themselves if we did that :D

    Which would be beautiful. Bring it on.
     
  23. Ausm

    Ausm Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    25,178
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wish my Ex would go, hell she could hold her own. ;)
     
  24. Matt1970

    Matt1970 Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    12,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    The way I understood it is that it was never about the ability of women in combat but more what is likely to happen to women captured in combat.
     
  25. nehalem256

    nehalem256 Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    1
    They will get to experience the true joys of equality :D

    If I were more hopeful I would say this might help highlight the difference.