Woman arrested for talking too loud on a cell phone

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

So you call swearing a disturbance?

Swearing out loud repeatedly and refusing to stop when being asked to is a disturbance.
The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

um..I think broon is on your side

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

um..I think broon is on your side

I know 🙂 I quoted the wrong text 😱

 

[broon]

Originally posted by: CVSiN

Um giga.. read the story again..
he asked her to calm down.. she basically said FU...
then when he tried to talk to her she shugged him off..
thats not how you stay outa jail..
he was a cop he asked nicely first and she ignored and blew him off..

he did not abuse his power she wasnt going to get a ticket etc... she basically evaded arrest therefore he put her ass down..
good for him..

Thank you. End of story.

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Nebor
He was a transit cop. He's not really supposed to deal with anything outside of public transportation.

ok and? Thats the best he could come up with? A women having an argument on her cell phone? Was he short on his monthly quota? How bout we just put army personell down there. They can shoot anyone speaking above a whisper in the head. That way everyone is quiet and noone will be annoyed by cursing or loud phone conversations. The courts wont be clogged with stupid cases and we wont have to pay for all this crap in the form of increased taxes. If they are going to behave like nazis might as well take it to the full extent and not do it half assed.

Most transit cops around here just stand around and ride the rails. At least this guy improved the quality of life on the bus. She's lucky she didn't get maced or tazered for resisting. The point of this isn't that she was talking or saying anything, but that she resisted arrest. The cop could have been asking her for the time, but if she ignored him and then pulled away twice, she could still be in trouble. The law requirse you to acknowledge police officers.

 

[imported_judge]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

 

[Viper GTS]

Sounds like the bitch deserved it.

Viper GTS

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: judge
i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Cursing in public has long been illegal in most places.

It's rarely enforced (obviously), but it exists for situations like this.

It has been challenged recently, such as this.

In all reality it's very unlikely that the charge would be upheld if you pushed it.

Viper GTS

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: Nebor
He was a transit cop. He's not really supposed to deal with anything outside of public transportation.

ok and? Thats the best he could come up with? A women having an argument on her cell phone? Was he short on his monthly quota? How bout we just put army personell down there. They can shoot anyone speaking above a whisper in the head. That way everyone is quiet and noone will be annoyed by cursing or loud phone conversations. The courts wont be clogged with stupid cases and we wont have to pay for all this crap in the form of increased taxes. If they are going to behave like nazis might as well take it to the full extent and not do it half assed.

Most transit cops around here just stand around and ride the rails. At least this guy improved the quality of life on the bus. She's lucky she didn't get maced or tazered for resisting. The point of this isn't that she was talking or saying anything, but that she resisted arrest. The cop could have been asking her for the time, but if she ignored him and then pulled away twice, she could still be in trouble. The law requirse you to acknowledge police officers.

Nope I want armed army personel. No tazerss or mace or any of that pvssy bullsh1t. Just hot lead in the forehead. I dont want any judge or jury. I want cold calculated precise black or white no bullsh1t wholesale execution of anyone annoying in public.

 

[imported_judge]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

yes been in metro, if I was arrested for this and had allot of money and care about this issue enough, i would take all the way to us supreme court and woudn't be suprised if it was declared that law is unconstituonal

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: Nebor
The cop could have been asking her for the time, but if she ignored him and then pulled away twice, she could still be in trouble. The law requirse you to acknowledge police officers.

I'm pretty sure that is not the case. It's a gray area, they have to have a reason to be approaching you. Asking for the time wouldn't qualify.

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure in general you are not required to acknowledge them. I certainly wouldn't push the issue though, it's not worth the hassle.

Viper GTS

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: Nebor
The cop could have been asking her for the time, but if she ignored him and then pulled away twice, she could still be in trouble. The law requirse you to acknowledge police officers.

I'm pretty sure that is not the case. It's a gray area, they have to have a reason to be approaching you. Asking for the time wouldn't qualify.

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure in general you are not required to acknowledge them. I certainly wouldn't push the issue though, it's not worth the hassle.

Viper GTS

When you say "hassle" you mean "nightstick to the face?"

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

very tolerant and forgiving of you. nazi.

 

[broon]

The first amendment guarantees the right to peacably assemble. You can say anything you want in any public place...without disturbing the peace.

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: Nebor

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: Nebor
The cop could have been asking her for the time, but if she ignored him and then pulled away twice, she could still be in trouble. The law requirse you to acknowledge police officers.

I'm pretty sure that is not the case. It's a gray area, they have to have a reason to be approaching you. Asking for the time wouldn't qualify.

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure in general you are not required to acknowledge them. I certainly wouldn't push the issue though, it's not worth the hassle.

Viper GTS

When you say "hassle" you mean "nightstick to the face?"

Nah, it's just much easier to support the people we pay to protect us. We pay their salary, they put their life on the line for us (well, maybe not transit police... 😉 ), it's common courtesy to respect them. Short of being a dick there's no justifiable reason to completely blow them off - Legal or not.

Viper GTS

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Nah, it's just much easier to support the people we pay to protect us. We pay their salary, they put their life on the line for us (well, maybe not transit police... 😉 ), it's common courtesy to respect them. Short of being a dick there's no justifiable reason to completely blow them off - Legal or not.

Viper GTS

It also helps to remind them that you pay their salary. They like to hear that.

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

very tolerant and forgiving of you. nazi.

Someone's been listening to too much Rage.

 

[gigapet]

lets look at the worst case scenario here if the officer did not take notice of this women.

She would have continued her argument on the cell for about lets say 20 min max. once in a confined area like a bus or train it is highly likely she would have recongnized the need to stop shouting. Her converssation would have annoyed a few ppl on there commute but then again those who dont shower can be accused of the same annoyance. She gets to work still on her cell phone...and begins shouting again. She gets off the fone as she enters her building. Those on the train or bus soon forget the disturbance and never think about her again. She isnt arrested or detained or harassed. She continues on her day as a productive member of society.(assuming she has a job) She doesnt have lawers fees to pay, she does lose a day of work for being in jail, the court dates/meetings with lawyer. Her employer does not lose productivity from her. She doesnt tie up the court with a pointless case. So worst case scenerio had the cop let her go...is she would have more money to spend and the courts would have one less meaningless case to deal with.

Yeah this arrest was deffinitely key!

 

[Ranger X]

Originally posted by: gigapet
lets look at the worst case scenario here if the officer did not take notice of this women.

She would have continued her argument on the cell for about lets say 20 min max. once in a confined area like a bus or train it is highly likely she would have recongnized the need to stop shouting. Her converssation would have annoyed a few ppl on there commute but then again those who dont shower can be accused of the same annoyance. She gets to work still on her cell phone...and begins shouting again. She gets off the fone as she enters her building. Those on the train or bus soon forget the disturbance and never think about her again. She isnt arrested or detained or harassed. She continues on her day as a productive member of society.(assuming she has a job) She doesnt have lawers fees to pay, she does lose a day of work for being in jail, the court dates/meetings with lawyer. Her employer does not lose productivity from her. She doesnt tie up the court with a pointless case. So worst case scenerio had the cop let her go...is she would have more money to spend and the courts would have one less meaningless case to deal with.

Yeah this arrest was deffinitely key!

Why do you keep defending this woman? It seems black and white to me. And what's to say she's going to stop talking once she gets on the bus? I've seen plenty of people talk (and even shout) aboard public transportation. Your arguments are baseless and weak.

With all these predictions/assumptions, who are you ... Ms. Cleo? :disgust:

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: Ranger X

Originally posted by: gigapet
lets look at the worst case scenario here if the officer did not take notice of this women.

She would have continued her argument on the cell for about lets say 20 min max. once in a confined area like a bus or train it is highly likely she would have recongnized the need to stop shouting. Her converssation would have annoyed a few ppl on there commute but then again those who dont shower can be accused of the same annoyance. She gets to work still on her cell phone...and begins shouting again. She gets off the fone as she enters her building. Those on the train or bus soon forget the disturbance and never think about her again. She isnt arrested or detained or harassed. She continues on her day as a productive member of society.(assuming she has a job) She doesnt have lawers fees to pay, she does lose a day of work for being in jail, the court dates/meetings with lawyer. Her employer does not lose productivity from her. She doesnt tie up the court with a pointless case. So worst case scenerio had the cop let her go...is she would have more money to spend and the courts would have one less meaningless case to deal with.

Yeah this arrest was deffinitely key!

Why do you keep defending this woman? It seems black and white to me. And what's to say she's going to stop talking once she gets on the bus? I've seen plenty of people talk (and even shout) aboard public transportation. Your arguments are baseless and weak.

With all these predictions/assumptions, who are you ... Ms. Cleo? :disgust:

ok i'll give you that. Say she keeps shouting on the bus...the ppl will soon forget her. I dont need to be ms. cleo to come up with the worst case scenerio of letting someone argue on there cell phone.

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

yes been in metro, if I was arrested for this and had allot of money and care about this issue enough, i would take all the way to us supreme court and woudn't be suprised if it was declared that law is unconstituonal

Your case would never make it to the supreme court.

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

very tolerant and forgiving of you. nazi.

Very ignorant of you, moron.

 

[ShotgunSteven]

The cop could have very well done her a favor. What if someone stuck in that car with her had become fed up and punched her in the gut?

 

[gigapet]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: gigapet

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: judge

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: broon

Originally posted by: gigapet

i said previously she could have stopped but at the same time the officer could be preventing real crimes.

So cops should avoid a public disturbance and look for "real" crimes? Then people like you will get pissed because a bunch of teenagers are gathering in the street outside your house and being loud at 10:57 pm and the cops are nowhere to be found.

A cop can't avoid the little things just because there MIGHT be bigger things going on.

The cop asked her to stop cursing. She refused to. On top of that, she attempted to break away. This woman is just as stupid as the candy bar lady from last month. All she had to do was stop cursing loudly in a public area.

judge: BTW which part of transit police did you not understand? You can't be as stupid as gigapet. But I could be wrong I suppose.

i understand what transit police is, what i don't understand since when did curssing became not protect under free speech

Yelling out curses repeatedly in a public place and refusing to stop when being politely asked to is a disturbance. I myself would have gotten a transit cop if that b!tch had been in my metro car. If she wants to argue with her boyfriend, she should keep it low or go outside.
Have you ever been inside a metro car? A person's voice carries far inside one and is very annoying. Hence, a disturbance.

very tolerant and forgiving of you. nazi.

Very ignorant of you, moron.

i'm just not seeing what i am being ignorant of? She cursed big deal get over it whiney biatch.