- Nov 30, 2005
- 50,235
- 117
- 116
I can't think of any game I would pay $60-$65 for and certainly not this one since I hated CoD4, the last CoD I owned.
KT
KT
Originally posted by: gorcorps
One of the biggest reasons devs site for moving away from the PC is because of lower profits. A mix of pirating, less user base, and other things can be blamed for it but it's no mystery that there's more money in the consoles. This is just a way to get some more money flowing from the PC crowd. While it costs a bit more initially for each gamer, it could spark more interest in PC gaming again if profits are boosted.
Now a bunch of you cheap fucks boycott the game, they lose even more money, and then another dev moves away from the PC market. You guys are single handedly ruining PC gaming for yourselves. Anybody who bitches about the price are not allowed to bitch about lack of PC support ever again.
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Thats the problem with spending assload of money to make games. You need to charge a lot to recoup expenses. The problem is, as prices go up, sales go down.
The fact people are talking about boycotting the game before its even out means companies should reconsider how they make games these days. One bad title can easily put you out of business.
Once again, I blame the console lovers. They demand better graphics every year and refuse to spend money on anything less. Production costs go up, price goes up. Eventually it affects everyone.
The fact they are actually willing to spend 60 bucks a pop doesnt help matters either. That just encourages publishers to charge high prices.
And I agree about the inflation issue. If Windows games are going for 60 dollars, you can bet the console people will be getting screwed.
I miss the NES days.
Actually, games during the NES/SNES era and for the N64 were grossly overpriced and much more expensive than they are now.
Originally posted by: Farmer
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Thats the problem with spending assload of money to market games.
There, I fixed it for you.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: 450R
$60? Nope. I got 6 hours out of COD4's campaign... 6 hours of linear, simplistic on-rails arcade gameplay. It wasn't a bad game for what it was by any stretch of the imagination - I just didn't feel like I got my money's worth.
And yet it has mutliplayer...
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Second, er... what? I didn't say anything about how increasing the price is going to address piracy. The only thing I said was that piracy is some part of why the PC game dev has been losing money and sales recently. A price jump is a hope to get some of that money back. I didn't say it'd stop pirating or anything like that.
Originally posted by: 450R
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Second, er... what? I didn't say anything about how increasing the price is going to address piracy. The only thing I said was that piracy is some part of why the PC game dev has been losing money and sales recently. A price jump is a hope to get some of that money back. I didn't say it'd stop pirating or anything like that.
My point was that, for anyone using lack of money as an excuse to pirate games, tacking on another $10 to the price isn't going to have a positive effect. To be honest, I can see a lot of people pirating MW2 out of spite alone because of it.
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Originally posted by: 450R
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Now a bunch of you cheap fucks boycott the game, they lose even more money, and then another dev moves away from the PC market. You guys are single handedly ruining PC gaming for yourselves. Anybody who bitches about the price are not allowed to bitch about lack of PC support ever again.
Choosing not to buy is considered boycotting? Raising the price to $60 is going to address piracy?
First, choosing not to buy just because you don't want it isn't boycotting. If you're trying to show you don't like the new price point by not buying, it's boycotting. I used that term because the OP mentioned it.
Second, er... what? I didn't say anything about how increasing the price is going to address piracy. The only thing I said was that piracy is some part of why the PC game dev has been losing money and sales recently. A price jump is a hope to get some of that money back. I didn't say it'd stop pirating or anything like that.
The decision makers at Activision are trying to please their stockholders by attempting to maximize profits. The problem with most large corporations is that it's never about what's good for the customers, it's all about squeezing the most money out of them that they can. Basically, the "If we can get away with it, lets do it" mentality.Originally posted by: gorcorps
Originally posted by: 450R
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Second, er... what? I didn't say anything about how increasing the price is going to address piracy. The only thing I said was that piracy is some part of why the PC game dev has been losing money and sales recently. A price jump is a hope to get some of that money back. I didn't say it'd stop pirating or anything like that.
My point was that, for anyone using lack of money as an excuse to pirate games, tacking on another $10 to the price isn't going to have a positive effect. To be honest, I can see a lot of people pirating MW2 out of spite alone because of it.
I know, and I totally agree. I don't think this will end in more money at all... I'm sure it'll bite them in the ass. But I think most can understand the mindset of increasing the price can possibly increase profit. They're trying it out and I doubt it will help, but I can understand the reasoning.
Originally posted by: skyofavalon
games drop in price so quick.Doesnt really matter.
Originally posted by: skyofavalon
games drop in price so quick.Doesnt really matter.
Originally posted by: Krakn3Dfx
Originally posted by: skyofavalon
games drop in price so quick.Doesnt really matter.
CoD4 is still $40 on the PC, CoD5 is still $50.
I dunno if that qualifies for "so quickly".