I have been doing ECCP for about 1 and a half months and have recently switched over to SETI for the race, and I have a question:
Will running a dc project give me an acurate descritpion of stability, in the sense that prime95 does?
All of the above abuse the processor constantly. It's as good as, if not better than, Prime95 in that regard It's a good indication of CPU stability anyway.
<< All of the above abuse the processor constantly. It's as good as, if not better than, Prime95 in that regard It's a good indication of CPU stability anyway. >>
I'll move back to ECCp as soon as SETI's immediate problem is resolved. Our battle with Sysopt and the DPC will be a long one, so I figure 2 weeks of downtime won't be too bad. And maybe we can talk some SETIers into helping us out a bit once we've given DSLR an education?
I would jump over and help out the SETI team except for 2 things:
(1) By the time I get seti configured on all the boxes it will hardly be worth the effort. It takes a while to hand config a lan <sigh>
(2) SETI's work units are just too damned big. I figured seti would eat 8GB a month+ on my lan. I can't justify that bandwidth usage when other options are available.
<< I would jump over and help out the SETI team except for 2 things:
(1) By the time I get seti configured on all the boxes it will hardly be worth the effort. It takes a while to hand config a lan <sigh>
(2) SETI's work units are just too damned big. I figured seti would eat 8GB a month+ on my lan. I can't justify that bandwidth usage when other options are available.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.