Will mankind have another huge discovery/invention/innovation?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RESmonkey

Diamond Member
May 6, 2007
4,818
2
0
Originally posted by: TruePaige
2010

* Supercomputers will have the same raw power as human brains (although not yet the equivalently flexible software).
* Computers will disappear as distinct physical objects, meaning many will have nontraditional shapes and/or will be embedded in clothing and everyday objects.
* Full-immersion audio-visual virtual reality will exist.





2010s

* Computers become smaller and increasingly integrated into everyday life.
* More and more computer devices will be used as miniature web servers, and more will have their resources pooled for computation.
* High-quality broadband Internet access will become available almost everywhere.
* Eyeglasses that beam images onto the users' retinas to produce virtual reality will be developed. They will also come with speakers or headphone attachments that will complete the experience with sounds. These eyeglasses will become a new medium for advertising as advertising will be wirelessly transmitted to them as one walks by various business establishments.
* The VR glasses will also have built-in computers featuring "virtual assistant" programs that can help the user with various daily tasks. (see Augmented Reality)
* Virtual assistants would be capable of multiple functions. One useful function would be real-time language translation in which words spoken in a foreign language would be translated into text that would appear as subtitles to a user wearing the glasses.
* Cell phones will be built into clothing and will be able to project sounds directly into the ears of their users.
* Advertisements will utilize a new technology whereby two ultrasonic beams can be targeted to intersect at a specific point, delivering a localized sound message that only a single person can hear. This was demonstrated in the films Minority Report and Back to the Future 2. See Sound from ultrasound.


2014

* Automatic house cleaning robots will have become common.


2018

* 10 Terabits (1013 bits) of computer memory?roughly the equivalent of the memory space in a single human brain--will cost $1000.


2020

* Personal computers will have the same processing power as human brains.





2020s

* Computers less than 100 nm in size will be possible.
* As one of their first practical applications, nanomachines will be used for medical purposes.
* Highly advanced medical nanobots will perform detailed brainscans on live patients.
* Accurate computer simulations of the entire human brain will exist due to these hyperaccurate brainscans, and the workings of the brain will be understood.
* Nanobots capable of entering the bloodstream to "feed" cells and extract waste will exist (though not necessarily be in wide use) by the end of this decade. They will make the normal mode of human food consumption obsolete. Thus, humans who have injected these nanobots into their bloodstream will evolve from having a normal human metabolism and become humanoid cyborgs. Eventually, according to Kurzweil, a large percentage of humans will evolve by this process into cyborgs.
* By the late 2020s, nanotech-based manufacturing will be in widespread use, radically altering the economy as all sorts of products can suddenly be produced for a fraction of their traditional-manufacture costs. The true cost of any product is now the amount it takes to download the design schematics.
* Also by the later part of this decade, virtual reality will be so high-quality that it will be indistinguishable from reality.
* The threat posed by genetically engineered pathogens permanently dissipates by the end of this decade as medical nanobots--far more durable, intelligent and capable than any microorganism--become sufficiently advanced.
* A computer will pass the Turing test by the last year of the decade (2029), meaning that it is a Strong AI and can think like a human (though the first A.I. is likely to be the equivalent of a kindergartner). This first A.I. is built around a computer simulation of a human brain, which was made possible by previous, nanotech-guided brainscanning.




2025

* The most likely year for the debut of advanced nanotechnology.
* Some military UAVs and land vehicles will be 100% computer-controlled.






2030s

* Mind uploading becomes possible.
* Nanomachines could be directly inserted into the brain and could interact with brain cells to totally control incoming and outgoing signals. As a result, truly full-immersion virtual reality could be generated without the need for any external equipment. Afferent nerve pathways could be blocked, totally canceling out the "real" world and leaving the user with only the desired virtual experience.
* Brain nanobots could also elicit emotional responses from users.
* Using brain nanobots, recorded or real-time brain transmissions of a person's daily life known as "experience beamers" will be available for other people to remotely experience. This is very similar to how the characters in Being John Malkovich were able to enter the mind of Malkovich and see the world through his eyes.
* Recreational uses aside, nanomachines in peoples' brains will allow them to greatly expand their cognitive, memory and sensory capabilities, to directly interface with computers, and to "telepathically" communicate with other, similarly augmented humans via wireless networks.
* The economy transits in GDP percentage to more meta services such as reality fabrication, mind enhancement, mental software. The GDP percentile of simulated, beamed, and augmented pornography will increase from 0.5% to over 10%, as production techniques reduce physical production costs of real things.
* The same nanotechnology should also allow people to alter the neural connections within their brains, changing the underlying basis for the person's intelligence, memories and personality.





2040s

* Human body 3.0 (as Kurzweil calls it) comes into existence. It lacks a fixed, corporeal form and can alter its shape and external appearance at will via foglet-like nanotechnology. Organs are also replaced by superior cybernetic implants.
* There will be social splitting into different levels of use of reality argumentation, from those who want to live in a life of imagined harems, or those who dedicate their thoughts to philosophical extension. Human society will drift apart in its focus, but with ever increasing capabilities to make imagined things occur.
* People spend most of their time in full-immersion virtual reality (Kurzweil has cited The Matrix as a good example of what the advanced virtual worlds will be like, without the dystopian twist).
* Foglets are in use.






2045: The Singularity

* $1000 buys a computer a billion times more powerful than the human brain. This means that average and even low-end computers are hugely smarter than even highly intelligent, unenhanced humans.
* The Singularity occurs as artificial intelligences surpass human beings as the smartest and most capable life forms on the Earth. Technological development is taken over by the machines, who can think, act and communicate so quickly that normal humans cannot even comprehend what is going on; thus the machines, acting in concert with those humans who have evolved into postbiological cyborgs, achieve effective world domination. The machines enter into a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, with each new generation of A.I.s appearing faster and faster. From this point onwards, technological advancement is explosive, under the control of the machines, and thus cannot be accurately predicted.
* The Singularity is an extremely disruptive, world-altering event that forever changes the course of human history. The extermination of humanity by violent machines is unlikely (though not impossible) because sharp distinctions between man and machine will no longer exist thanks to the existence of cybernetically enhanced humans and uploaded humans.




Post-2045: "Waking up" the Universe

* The physical bottom limit to how small computer transistors can be shrunk is reached. From this moment onwards, computers can only be made more powerful if they are made larger in size.
* Because of this, A.I.s convert more and more of the Earth's matter into engineered, computational substrate capable of supporting more A.I.s. until the whole Earth is one, gigantic computer (but some areas will remain set aside as nature preserves).
* At this point, the only possible way to increase the intelligence of the machines any farther is to begin converting all of the matter in the universe into similar massive computers. A.I.s radiate out into space in all directions from the Earth, breaking down whole planets, moons and meteoroids and reassembling them into giant computers. This, in effect, "wakes up" the universe as all the inanimate "dumb" matter (rocks, dust, gases, etc.) is converted into structured matter capable of supporting life (albeit synthetic life).
* Kurzweil predicts that machines will have the ability to make planet-sized computers by 2099, which underscores how enormously technology will advance after the Singularity.
* The process of "waking up" the universe will be complete as early as 2199.
* With the entire universe made into a giant, highly efficient supercomputer, A.I./human hybrids (so integrated that, in truth it is a new category of "life") would have both supreme intelligence and physical control over the universe. Kurzweil suggests that this will open up all sorts of new possibilities such as doing the infinitely impossible and beyond.




Some indeterminate point within a few decades from now

* Space technology becomes advanced enough to provide the Earth permanent protection from the threat of asteroid impacts.
* The antitechnology "Luddite" movement will grow increasingly vocal and possibly resort to violence, possibly a new World War, as these people become enraged over the emergence of new technologies that threaten traditional attitudes regarding the nature of human life (radical life extension, genetic engineering, cybernetics) and the supremacy of mankind (artificial intelligence). Though the Luddites might, at best, succeed in delaying the Singularity, the march of technology is irresistible and they will inevitably fail in keeping the world frozen at a fixed level of development. However, some nature preserves may be set aside for them to live in.
* The emergence of distributed energy grids and full-immersion virtual reality will, when combined with high bandwidth Internet, enable the ultimate in telecommuting. This, in turn, will make cities obsolete since workers will no longer need to be located near their workplaces. The decentralization of the population will make societies less vulnerable to terrorist and military attacks.

won't happen that soon.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: eldorado99
There are plenty of problems with these predictions, the largest of which I can recognize quickly is the lack of recognition of quantum mechanics or computing, also the fact that we still do not the least bit understand dark matter or energy, or even come close to understanding how we may harness them in the future, which is what I believe may be our next biggest breakthrough, (though it may take 100 years or more).
"Harnessing" them might not even be possible. As I understand it, "dark" in both of those monikers means "We don't really know what it is." The followup terms "energy" and "matter" are kind of vague too, as the effects we observe very roughly correlate to some effects of the energy and matter we all know and love.


I'm going with something like MOND for now - that the observed inconsistencies don't so much mean that there are mysterious, utterly invisible forces at work out there, but that our models are missing something somewhere in the math or the accounting. For all we know, running our labs at the bottom of a gravity well, which is itself orbiting another gravity well, isn't the greatest place in the Universe to be conducting experiments - kind of like if you live your whole life in a crack house while writing the DSM-V. You might overlook some very key psychological problems, since that's the only frame of reference you have. ;)



Originally posted by: Skoorb
Not to mention he's failed to explain why it would actually be better for the human race as a whole to know unequivocally that they are purely the result of chemical reactions and physics influences and they are of literally no more merit to the universe at all than a rock or a tree and it doesn't care about them now and never has and never will.
It gives us the ability to truly define for ourselves our ultimate goals in life, rather than try to follow the ideals set forth in some ancient text from just one of many possible religions. The reason many people choose the religion they do is because it's something that's popular. I bring him up again, but not many convertees are showing any love for Zeus. They're going with one of the branches of one of the "correct" mainstream religions available today. If you were to seriously convert to the ancient Greek Pantheon of Gods, people would laugh at you for joining a religion of ancient fairy tales, while at the same time turning around to pray to their own god without giving it a second thought.




Also, for gods sake people, stop quoting TruePaige's long quote from Wikipedia, or wherever it's from. It doesn't take more than a few seconds to type "snip."


 

JJChicken

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2007
6,165
16
81
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
The next major advancement for mankind will be the realization that there is no God, and that all religion is a pursuit of foolishness. Only when we achieve this, will we be released from the confines of stupidity. Everyone knows this.

 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
The next major advancement for mankind will be the realization that there is no God, and that all religion is a pursuit of foolishness. Only when we achieve this, will we be released from the confines of stupidity. Everyone knows this.

Wait!!

In another thread, yesterday, i saw someone comment something really, really good.

He said its actually not an issue of religion - even without religion people would "somehow" organize themselves and commit atrocities and murder, ONLY for a different reason.

I think this is VERY true.

I was also with the opinion that (institutional) religion is the reason and cause for MANY bad things - but i changed my opinion.

It doesnt matter. The underlying cause is POWER (and human nature itself)...be it with a god/jesus/buddha/allah...or without it. Humans will always have a reason to single out, oppress, murder, genocide etc..etc... and they do not need to be religious organized to do it. Think about it!!

Example would be a totalitarian regime (Hitler..., Communism,...) where people do and believe what some dictator says...or whatever other bizarre reasons. Religion is just a "help" for those people in power to disguise their motives and make them easier acceptable for the masses. The underlying problem is NOT the religion itself - the problem is rather how religions and beliefs are taken as a tool to serve such purposes.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,129
34,431
136
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Nuclear technology holds so much promise for solving so many problems. But idiots on our planet insist that nuclear energy is somehow "Bad." Using nuclear rockets, we can reduce travel to Mars to weeks instead of months, we can have nearly unlimited supplies of energy (all clean), and we can use it in medicine.

There are sooo many awesome technologies out there that we're on the brink of discovering, but the stupid religious zealots and politicians are holding us back.

Explain please.

Currently for our space trips we carry all the fuel we need for the way there and back, so we must conserve fuel.

If we had a nuclear reactor on board we could create our fuel, and large quantities of it using almost no additional weight (enriched uranium is pretty light for the power output it can provide).

Through this we can utilize much more powerful engines as energy efficiency is no longer a concern.

We still have to bring the matter with us that we would convert to fuel using the power of the reactor. We still have to get all that mass up there. The only other choice is some sort of scoop ship but for the distance to Mars I doubt that lifting the parts of a scoop ship into orbit and assembling them would be any more economical (energy wise) than lifting the fuel for regular rockets.

Jeff7 mentioned pulse engines which are okay once we are away from the earth but I can't imagine anyone seriously considering them for liftoff.
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
virtual reality body gear that fits like body-armor and wirelessly transmits to a computer. oh, and somehow, the suit resists motion if it doesn't want you to move a certain way. so, if you were to play nintendo wii tennis, when you hit the tennis ball, you'd feel the velocity of the ball as you strike it with your air racket. they also tested it out for rehabbing athletes who underwent surgery to make sure their body can be trained back to the way it was before it got injured (for example, a baseball pitcher with a rotator cuff repair won't pitch the exact same as he did before... this suit forces him to by restricting motion that isn't exactly the same as it used to be, so he'd have to completely retrain his muscles).

it's pretty amazing.

it will be used everywhere... rehab clinics, all gaming platforms, sports, hospitals... it's gonna be the next light bulb.
 

WraithETC

Golden Member
May 15, 2005
1,464
1
81
1997 - Skynet has become self aware

2000 - The first Matrix is created

2001- Humans block the sun

3000- Software preventing music piracy is concieved.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
** Videogames, Movies etc...brought right into your brain.

I am pretty sure it will be possible in the future to sync and influence brain functions..so instead of a "monitor" or "screen" you will *really be* there.
(Aka "Project Brainstorm", the movie)

** wireless transmission of energy. Wires/Plugs/Chords...good bye. (VERY SOON actually)

** "Beaming" of matter? Interesting concept...not sure about that.

** FTL. travel... same. Not sure about it. Science says it wont be possible tho, but there are still wormholes :)
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Nuclear technology holds so much promise for solving so many problems. But idiots on our planet insist that nuclear energy is somehow "Bad." Using nuclear rockets, we can reduce travel to Mars to weeks instead of months, we can have nearly unlimited supplies of energy (all clean), and we can use it in medicine.

There are sooo many awesome technologies out there that we're on the brink of discovering, but the stupid religious zealots and politicians are holding us back.

Explain please.

Currently for our space trips we carry all the fuel we need for the way there and back, so we must conserve fuel.

If we had a nuclear reactor on board we could create our fuel, and large quantities of it using almost no additional weight (enriched uranium is pretty light for the power output it can provide).

Through this we can utilize much more powerful engines as energy efficiency is no longer a concern.

We still have to bring the matter with us that we would convert to fuel using the power of the reactor. We still have to get all that mass up there. The only other choice is some sort of scoop ship but for the distance to Mars I doubt that lifting the parts of a scoop ship into orbit and assembling them would be any more economical (energy wise) than lifting the fuel for regular rockets.

Jeff7 mentioned pulse engines which are okay once we are away from the earth but I can't imagine anyone seriously considering them for liftoff.

Okay, look at it this way. How much rocket fuel would it take to generate the same amount of power as a small nuclear reactor?

There is a reason that vehicles that need to go for long amounts of time with lots of power demands are nuclear powered. (Subs, ships).

In fact, NASA has been working on quite a few Nuclear powered space vehicles for this very reason, though they don't get the funding they deserve. (Much like nuclear power plants, the public is wary of nuclear powered space vehicles)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Prometheus

Ion engines are also a hot topic lately, so I'd recommend looking up NEP, which is a method for powering Ion engines with nuclear power.

Just for a fun side note: If you want to see a more fun example, look up Project Orion (which would most likely NEVER get off the ground because of nuclear waste matter concerns), but they claimed they could left an 8,000,000 ton ship off the ground using the force of 1080 small bomb reactions. 0.0
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,129
34,431
136
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
Nuclear technology holds so much promise for solving so many problems. But idiots on our planet insist that nuclear energy is somehow "Bad." Using nuclear rockets, we can reduce travel to Mars to weeks instead of months, we can have nearly unlimited supplies of energy (all clean), and we can use it in medicine.

There are sooo many awesome technologies out there that we're on the brink of discovering, but the stupid religious zealots and politicians are holding us back.

Explain please.

Currently for our space trips we carry all the fuel we need for the way there and back, so we must conserve fuel.

If we had a nuclear reactor on board we could create our fuel, and large quantities of it using almost no additional weight (enriched uranium is pretty light for the power output it can provide).

Through this we can utilize much more powerful engines as energy efficiency is no longer a concern.

We still have to bring the matter with us that we would convert to fuel using the power of the reactor. We still have to get all that mass up there. The only other choice is some sort of scoop ship but for the distance to Mars I doubt that lifting the parts of a scoop ship into orbit and assembling them would be any more economical (energy wise) than lifting the fuel for regular rockets.

Jeff7 mentioned pulse engines which are okay once we are away from the earth but I can't imagine anyone seriously considering them for liftoff.

Okay, look at it this way. How much rocket fuel would it take to generate the same amount of power as a small nuclear reactor?

There is a reason that vehicles that need to go for long amounts of time with lots of power demands are nuclear powered. (Subs, ships).

In fact, NASA has been working on quite a few Nuclear powered space vehicles for this very reason, though they don't get the funding they deserve. (Much like nuclear power plants, the public is wary of nuclear powered space vehicles)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Prometheus

Ion engines are also a hot topic lately, so I'd recommend looking up NEP, which is a method for powering Ion engines with nuclear power.

Just for a fun side note: If you want to see a more fun example, look up Project Orion (which would most likely NEVER get off the ground because of nuclear waste matter concerns), but they claimed they could left an 8,000,000 ton ship off the ground using the force of 1080 small bomb reactions. 0.0

Using nuclear power to drive all the on-board systems makes sense. Nuclear reactors are simple heat sources. To actually move the ship we have to translate that heat into thrust. On a rocket, this means throwing mass off the back end at high speed. Your link above links to this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_thermal_rocket

which discusses the thermal nuclear rocket engines. For long distance travel the ship still needs to carry sufficient mass to chuck out the back, whether this mass is heated and accelerated by chemical means or nuclear means doesn't remove the necessity of carrying it along or gathering it as the ship moves (hydrogen scoop). According to the article I linked it looks like nuclear heating of ejection fluids can be more weight efficient than chemical under some circumstances.