• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wikileaks releases Podesta's emails

Page 23 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Victorian Gray said:
Still hard at work I see.

Animals-Know-how-to-use-Computers-Funny-Pics-8.jpg
Click to expand...

This seems pretty unfair to hardworking parrots diligently mimicking message, whereas 0roo is just copy-pasting.

0roo is more like the really old folks whose facilities are going forwarding those scammy emails all the time.
 
Not one of the emails have been found to be falsified so what's your problem with it? If it's Russia so what? We the American people are better off for someone (highly doubt the Wikileaks release is Russia, the DNC hack perhaps) shedding light on a candidate that refuses at all costs to be transparent.
 
UglyCasanova said:
Not one of the emails have been found to be falsified so what's your problem with it? If it's Russia so what? We the American people are better off for someone (highly doubt the Wikileaks release is Russia, the DNC hack perhaps) shedding light on a candidate that refuses at all costs to be transparent.
Click to expand...

So, partisanship before patriotism, right? When the Russians set out to damage the credibility of our govt & our system you cheer them on? Because Trump?
 
DrDoug said:
That's all I care to see... you're an American PatriNot. 🙂

Why do you hate America and it's institutions? Because your political party taught you to hate them... no need to respond, I'll just laugh at you from now on.
Click to expand...
Jhhnn said:
So, partisanship before patriotism, right? When the Russians set out to damage the credibility of our govt & our system you cheer them on? Because Trump?
Click to expand...

MA PUTINZ!!11!
 
If it is Russia that has hacked Podestas emails. Why hasn't there been any official evidence and sanctions announced against Russia?
 
DrDoug said:
That's all I care to see... you're an American PatriNot. 🙂

Why do you hate America and it's institutions? Because your political party taught you to hate them... no need to respond, I'll just laugh at you from now on.
Click to expand...


You're right, I better put my blinders back on..
 
Jhhnn said:
So, partisanship before patriotism, right? When the Russians set out to damage the credibility of our govt & our system you cheer them on? Because Trump?
Click to expand...


No not because Trump, and I'd be tickled to death if all his laundry were being aired too. Hillary hasn't been transparent throughout her political career, it's about time we know who we're electing. Did she release the transcripts herself? No, Wikileaks had to do it for her. Was it Russia? I don't know and neither do you, but the fact of the matter is we got a glimpse behind the curtain and saw what she was telling them (and it didn't sound much like Bernie). We saw the DNC rigged the election against Sanders. Again, Russians? Who knows, but who cares? The truth was exposed, and the truth was the truth regardless of the messenger.
 
UglyCasanova said:
No not because Trump, and I'd be tickled to death if all his laundry were being aired too. Hillary hasn't been transparent throughout her political career, it's about time we know who we're electing. Did she release the transcripts herself? No, Wikileaks had to do it for her. Was it Russia? I don't know and neither do you, but the fact of the matter is we got a glimpse behind the curtain and saw what she was telling them (and it didn't sound much like Bernie). We saw the DNC rigged the election against Sanders. Again, Russians? Who knows, but who cares? The truth was exposed, and the truth was the truth regardless of the messenger.
Click to expand...

Meanwhile, you've clearly made leaps of faith between actually reading the material & forming conclusions.The DNC favoring Clinton doesn't account for a 3.7M vote spread. Voters do that. Her speech excerpts? Quote the ones you find objectionable.

Who cares? We should all care when the most corrupt oligarchs on the planet attempt to influence our elections. It's even more objectionable when one candidate calls on them to do more of the same.
 
UglyCasanova said:
Not one of the emails have been found to be falsified so what's your problem with it? If it's Russia so what? We the American people are better off for someone (highly doubt the Wikileaks release is Russia, the DNC hack perhaps) shedding light on a candidate that refuses at all costs to be transparent.
Click to expand...

They finally hacked trumps taxes?! I've been wondering when we were going to see them.


Oh you were talking about a political party's emails? I must have missed it but where can I view the Republican national committees emails? After all, it's only Clinton and the DNC that's refusing to be transparent right?

/s

I'd ask you to show me your various posts where you've asked for more transparency from trump and the RNC but we both know partisan hacks are going to hack.
 
UglyCasanova said:
No not because Trump, and I'd be tickled to death if all his laundry were being aired too. Hillary hasn't been transparent throughout her political career, it's about time we know who we're electing. Did she release the transcripts herself? No, Wikileaks had to do it for her. Was it Russia? I don't know and neither do you, but the fact of the matter is we got a glimpse behind the curtain and saw what she was telling them (and it didn't sound much like Bernie). We saw the DNC rigged the election against Sanders. Again, Russians? Who knows, but who cares? The truth was exposed, and the truth was the truth regardless of the messenger.
Click to expand...

Hillary hasn't been transparent throughout her career?

By all means show me your average politician who's transparency standards you are comparing Hillary to and tell me what exactly she's hiding and they are not.
 
UglyCasanova said:
No not because Trump, and I'd be tickled to death if all his laundry were being aired too. Hillary hasn't been transparent throughout her political career, it's about time we know who we're electing. Did she release the transcripts herself? No, Wikileaks had to do it for her. Was it Russia? I don't know and neither do you, but the fact of the matter is we got a glimpse behind the curtain and saw what she was telling them (and it didn't sound much like Bernie). We saw the DNC rigged the election against Sanders. Again, Russians? Who knows, but who cares? The truth was exposed, and the truth was the truth regardless of the messenger.
Click to expand...

Have you never had a job or otherwise similar opportunity to observe how politics works? Not a rhetorical question.
 
UglyCasanova said:
You're right, I better put my blinders back on..
Click to expand...

correct. If transparency were your concern, then you'd be asking why "wikileaks" hasn't released anything hacked from the RNC or the D Trump for president campaign.

If you have convinced yourself that no such hacks occurred, then you are being foolish.
 
zinfamous said:
correct. If transparency were your concern, then you'd be asking why "wikileaks" hasn't released anything hacked from the RNC or the D Trump for president campaign.

If you have convinced yourself that no such hacks occurred, then you are being foolish.
Click to expand...

lol you're such a fucking hack, give some garbage talking about, get refuted, run and hide, then repeat it over and over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top