Originally posted by: jumpr
Don't get me wrong, I think Paris is attractive, but her personality completely turns me off. I wouldn't kick her out of bed, but I know girls that I'd have a MUCH better time with in a full-on relationship.Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
I understand that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, but be honest to yourself. Or how does that lame proverb goes? Oh "Honesty is the best virtue".Originally posted by: jumpr
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One man's trash is another man's treasure. Shall I continue with the lame proverbs, or do you understand yet? Not everyone has the same opinion, and just because someone doesn't have a beautiful SO, it doesn't mean they're not allowed to call girls unattractive.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Take Paris Hilton for instance, I think she's cute, more beautiful than most woman you know, or see.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things
(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)
A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things
(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)
A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.
That doesn't change the fact that she is ugly. It just means you would give in to get some.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things
(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)
A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.
That doesn't change the fact that she is ugly. It just means you would give in to get some.
You're so deluded it's not even humorous. She's a physically attractive woman. The reason most of you are saying she's not is her personality and complete lack of brainpower - and on that note I'd agree with you. But "ugly" is a word that describes a person's looks, not personality.
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Call me weird, but I'd rather have a decent looking girl with brains and a personality than a dim-witted hottie like Paris Hilton. She certainly isn't "ugly" by any means, though.
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.
I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.
I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.
Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.
I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.
Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)
No you are confusing things. I saw pics before the vid (finally watched recently) and I don't think she is attractive at all.
The word ugly carries many meanings, connotations, and to some extent inferences. Should not be limited to physical appearance.Originally posted by: Gurck
But "ugly" is a word that describes a person's looks, not personality.
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Why is it so difficult for some people to understand that this is all about PREFERENCE, we all don't have the same tastes.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.
I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.
Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)
No you are confusing things. I saw pics before the vid (finally watched recently) and I don't think she is attractive at all.
k
Not saying she's the hottest woman I've ever seen or anything, by a long shot. But she certainly is attractive, maybe a ... ~8 / 10, whereas a woman like Janet Reno would be a 3, and physically deformed a ~1. Anyone who claims otherwise has issues, be it a religious man afraid that admitting the truth will earn him bad favor with J.C. or an ugly man with a bone to pick with attractive, self-confident women, or whatever else.
Because it's high school all over Dacalo, it's like that one really hot cheerleader in school that all the nerds would secretly wish they have a chance with, but amongst themselves, it's "This slut this", or "this hoe that". Get it?Originally posted by: Dacalo
Why is it so difficult for some people to understand that this is all about PREFERENCE, we all don't have the same tastes.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Surely you didn't call Paris Hilton talented?
