Why would most ATOTers ever call any females ugly?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dacalo

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2000
8,778
4
76
In my opinion, she is ugly.

Don't try to force your little view on me. It's called having an opinion and perspective.
If you don't know what those are, you are the one living a sheltered life.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,392
12,997
136
for a "hollywood" person she definitely isn't hot. i also second the "skank" remark:thumbsup:
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: jumpr
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One man's trash is another man's treasure. Shall I continue with the lame proverbs, or do you understand yet? Not everyone has the same opinion, and just because someone doesn't have a beautiful SO, it doesn't mean they're not allowed to call girls unattractive.
I understand that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, but be honest to yourself. Or how does that lame proverb goes? Oh "Honesty is the best virtue".
Don't get me wrong, I think Paris is attractive, but her personality completely turns me off. I wouldn't kick her out of bed, but I know girls that I'd have a MUCH better time with in a full-on relationship.

I probably would... from what I've seen of her I can't stand her personality... the way she looks has nothing to do with it.

*EDIT* "That's hot" is fuggin annoying!
 

Sluggo

Lifer
Jun 12, 2000
15,488
5
81
I remember way back when this set of pics first surfaced around here.

About 1/2 the posters here at ATOT deemed the subject of the photos as horribly fat and ugly.

Another 1/3 firmly believed that if they were the owner of the BMW that they could get much better chicks.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Paris Hilton talented ? At what ? My biggest problem with her is that she's famous just because. If she had some actual talent doing something, then I'd at least have some respect for her (not that she really cares anyway).
 

wfbberzerker

Lifer
Apr 12, 2001
10,423
0
0
atoters are used to seeing (and fondling themselves to) models/pornstars on the internet, so their conception of who is "attractive" is skewed.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things

(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)

A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.
 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
79,044
445
136
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Take Paris Hilton for instance, I think she's cute, more beautiful than most woman you know, or see.

<insert gag me emoticon>

If you like slutty celebrities :)
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things

(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)

A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.


That doesn't change the fact that she is ugly. It just means you would give in to get some.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things

(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)

A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.


That doesn't change the fact that she is ugly. It just means you would give in to get some.

You're so deluded it's not even humorous. She's a physically attractive woman. The reason most of you are saying she's not is her personality and complete lack of brainpower - and on that note I'd agree with you. But "ugly" is a word that describes a person's looks, not personality.
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Gurck
Being a ditzy bitch and being ugly are two different things

(yes I'm quoting myself since I rule so much and nobody has said anything even remotely intelligent since my last (quoted) post)

A lot of you are saying you wouldn't hit it with a 10' pole based on her personality - which I'd wholeheartedly agree with. She's almost comically stupid, she's a c**t, she's the antithesis of what most of you, and I, want of a woman - personality-wise. But if you (the 1% of you who're 25+ and happily married are excepted) honestly think that, faced with the phenomenally improbable situation of her lying naked in your bed, saying "take me you nerdy hunk you", would not hit it... you're sorely mistaken. At least I can admit I'd split that idiot in half.


That doesn't change the fact that she is ugly. It just means you would give in to get some.

You're so deluded it's not even humorous. She's a physically attractive woman. The reason most of you are saying she's not is her personality and complete lack of brainpower - and on that note I'd agree with you. But "ugly" is a word that describes a person's looks, not personality.



Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.

I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Call me weird, but I'd rather have a decent looking girl with brains and a personality than a dim-witted hottie like Paris Hilton. She certainly isn't "ugly" by any means, though.

Agreed. Oh, Tina, how I should have asked you out when I had the chance. *sigh*
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.

I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.

Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.

I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.

Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)

No you are confusing things. I saw pics before the vid (finally watched recently) and I don't think she is attractive at all.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.

I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.

Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)

No you are confusing things. I saw pics before the vid (finally watched recently) and I don't think she is attractive at all.

k ;)

Not saying she's the hottest woman I've ever seen or anything, by a long shot. But she certainly is attractive, maybe a ... ~8 / 10, whereas a woman like Janet Reno would be a 3, and physically deformed a ~1. Anyone who claims otherwise has issues, be it a religious man afraid that admitting the truth will earn him bad favor with J.C. or an ugly man with a bone to pick with attractive, self-confident women, or whatever else.
 

ActuaryTm

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2003
6,858
12
81
Originally posted by: Gurck
But "ugly" is a word that describes a person's looks, not personality.
The word ugly carries many meanings, connotations, and to some extent inferences. Should not be limited to physical appearance.
 

Dacalo

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2000
8,778
4
76
Why is it so difficult for some people to understand that this is all about PREFERENCE, we all don't have the same tastes.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Why is it so difficult for some people to understand that this is all about PREFERENCE, we all don't have the same tastes.

Oh, I'd have to say we do. She may not be the 10/10 that someone like Tara Reid or Lindsay Lohan is, but she's not the 1-3 / 10 that we'd all agree Janet Reno is. Overall she's more attractive than most women out there. See my above post about your issues - things like this can be worked out at the rate of ~1 hour a week. Some insurance policies even cover it.
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: fredtam
Actually I don't really have any insight into her personality. I can honestly say the only place I've seen her is in pictures. I don't watch TV.

I take that back I have seen her in videos. She is not only ugly but pretty lame in the sack too.

Again, you're confusing things that have nothing to do with physical attractiveness (ie. her prowess in the sack) with looks. And I don't watch TV, just going by what I've gleaned off the net and "The Video" (agreed on that one, she seems more interested in the camera than her partner)

No you are confusing things. I saw pics before the vid (finally watched recently) and I don't think she is attractive at all.

k ;)

Not saying she's the hottest woman I've ever seen or anything, by a long shot. But she certainly is attractive, maybe a ... ~8 / 10, whereas a woman like Janet Reno would be a 3, and physically deformed a ~1. Anyone who claims otherwise has issues, be it a religious man afraid that admitting the truth will earn him bad favor with J.C. or an ugly man with a bone to pick with attractive, self-confident women, or whatever else.

I would at most put her at a five. Have a look at a pic where she isn't posing, airbrushed or half naked then imagine that girl passing you in the mall. I for one would not take a second glance. Too skinny, bleached hair, odd facial structure. What about her makes an 8? I see girls everyday that make Paris look like a dog.
 

BamBam215

Golden Member
Feb 17, 2000
1,217
0
0
why would you care so much what other people think? maybe some of the girls talked about on the forums ARE a bit bleh. but of course a few of us (ahem) are too blinded by their testosterone that they think ANYTHING is beautiful. but hey, whatever floats your boat.
 

Munkies123

Senior member
Jun 29, 2004
620
0
0
She does look like a little boy sometimes but man i would still bang her like banging was going out of style or something, but seriously im sure all of you who say that she is ugly as sin or w/e are not a 10th as relatively attractive as her.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Why is it so difficult for some people to understand that this is all about PREFERENCE, we all don't have the same tastes.
Because it's high school all over Dacalo, it's like that one really hot cheerleader in school that all the nerds would secretly wish they have a chance with, but amongst themselves, it's "This slut this", or "this hoe that". Get it?