Why were the last 2 matrix movies released the same year?

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,891
31,410
146
does it matter? they were two of the worst movies ever made (with a particularly special achievement in suckitude going to Matrix 2)
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
because Matrix 2 doesn't even count as a movie. It was just a bridge between the first one and the last one.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
I don't get it either. It would have been smarter for them to release them a few years apart so that A) they could have made the third one better based on feedback from the second, and B) so people would have a couple years to forget how shitty the second one was.

This is what happened with the Star Wars prequels. Well, B at least.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,908
4,940
136
They were filmed back to back as one arc. They aren't stand alone entries.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
I kind of liked the 3rd one. /shrug

KT
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
4,037
1,533
136
in the original 3 screenplays there was no time skip from end of 1 to the start of 2. since everything was more or less happening in actual screentime and they knew they were making 2 sequels there is no benefit in waiting years between and having your actors age .

mind you the watchowskis did a rewrite on both scripts when a couple of the cast members died. the original 2 script picks up right after the end of the first movie and has neo just do the burly brawl realizing that he'll likely have to kill millions of matrix pod humans in order to defeat the machines.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
Because that's all the time one needs to take a dump. I wish the guys who Mae 2&3 had been run over by a range rover after the first one so that they couldn't have made anymore movies.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
It was almost Dr Zhivago compared to the 2nd one.

....so that's like, The Bridge on the River Kwai?

:hmm:

Maybe? :hmm: I can't tell if that's an insult to Kwai or not (I love Bridge on the River Kwai).

KT
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
in the original 3 screenplays there was no time skip from end of 1 to the start of 2. since everything was more or less happening in actual screentime and they knew they were making 2 sequels there is no benefit in waiting years between and having your actors age .

mind you the watchowskis did a rewrite on both scripts when a couple of the cast members died. the original 2 script picks up right after the end of the first movie and has neo just do the burly brawl realizing that he'll likely have to kill millions of matrix pod humans in order to defeat the machines.

So they just filmed movies 2 and 3 in the one go then?
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Same, while 2 was the worst, the three of them were all good movies, with the first being the best obviously.


In most trilogies, the bridge movie, or the 2d one, typically is the "worst" of the three. 1st sets up the confrontation, 3d is the climax and resolution. 2d just advances the plot.