Why vote for Edwards?

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
link

17 reasons to vote for him.

As a Libertarian or moderate, he's not that bad of a choice. Much better than Kerry imho
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.

Herman Munster is not that cosmetically appealing
 

seriousbro

Member
Feb 20, 2004
30
0
0
Edwards is an awesome candidate if you vote for him. He is very bright and I believe it when he says he will fight for working individuals as he was rather poor when he was younger but now a multimillionaire. I think he has better debating skills and can relate to his constiuency better than Kerry or Bush, he reminds me of a JFK/Clinton figure but probably has better morals.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.

Herman Munster is not that cosmetically appealing

That's not a nice thing to say about Gore! :p
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.

Herman Munster is not that cosmetically appealing

That's not a nice thing to say about Gore! :p

You are getting Eddie and his Dad messed up
 

juiio

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2000
1,433
4
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.

Considering the number of Democrats that have chosen electability as their number one reason for voting for a particular candidate, I don't see any problem with those statements.

By the way, he is correct. He is far more electable than John Kerry.

 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: juiio
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.

As does this:

When potential voters are shown pictures of candidates by pollsters, Edwards receives extremely favorable ratings

What is this? American Idol?



But, he'll most likely get my vote in the primary and, hopefully, in the general election.

Considering the number of Democrats that have chosen electability as their number one reason for voting for a particular candidate, I don't see any problem with those statements.

By the way, he is correct. He is far more electable than John Kerry.

And I'm a registered republican....

Created a poll for it here So far Edwards is dominating. I don't see why Kerry has the following that he has if half the people are voting for him to get Bush out of the white house, when nominating him is guaranteeing Dubya anothewr 4 years. Especially since Nader has tossed his hat in the ring.
 

Romans828

Banned
Feb 14, 2004
525
0
0
He does even have a snowballs chance of carrying his own state come the general election (remind you of anyone else).

Edwards is a joke to people here in North Carolina.

Has anyone even stopped to ask why he is even remotely qualified to be president?

 

Romans828

Banned
Feb 14, 2004
525
0
0
Oh yeah thanks to that Edwards site link, thats the funniest thing I have seen in ages......

"Not part of the elite", "Not Beholden to Special Interests", "Republicans are Scared of Him"

Who makes this stuff up???????? Damn funny stuff no Sh*t

 

juiio

Golden Member
Feb 28, 2000
1,433
4
81
Originally posted by: Romans828
He does even have a snowballs chance of carrying his own state come the general election (remind you of anyone else).

Edwards is a joke to people here in North Carolina.

Has anyone even stopped to ask why he is even remotely qualified to be president?

Democratic Senators from North Carolina rarely last more than one term :)

Besides, he wouldn't be the first Democratic candidate to fail to carry his home state.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: Romans828
Oh yeah thanks to that Edwards site link, thats the funniest thing I have seen in ages......

"Not part of the elite", "Not Beholden to Special Interests", "Republicans are Scared of Him"

Who makes this stuff up???????? Damn funny stuff no Sh*t

Rush and Sean are
 

Romans828

Banned
Feb 14, 2004
525
0
0
Seriously Edwards is a joke which you'll see for yourself if he becomes to big of threat to Kerry.

I love when them Dems turn on each other its funny stuff.....

Kerry has your nomination sewn up, question is will Edwards recant and settle for VP?
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.
Well, when you look at the polls that say most dem voters just want someone who can beat Bush (and vote for Kerry because of this), it becomes important for Edwards...

How many voters know nothing about Kerry except that he's leading in the race for the Democratic nomination?

People forget that every story with a headline like "Kerry would beat Bush if the election were held today" also contains a short blurb that shows those same respondents would pick Edwards over Bush...

But yes, there are plenty of reason to support Edwards otherwise :)
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: Romans828
Has anyone even stopped to ask why he is even remotely qualified to be president?

I suppose Dems are stealing the Repub's 2000 plan.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
6. Not Beholden to Special Interests

Thats a HUGE OUTRIGHT LIE. So is not being an elite. He might not have grown up that way, but he is an elite, he associates with elites, he is solely finanically backed by elites.

Edwards campaign is solely funded by trial lawyers. His chief fund raiser is a trial lawyer, Fred Baron.

Hes is beholden to trial lawyers. He would be a puppet for the likes of Fred Baron and his ilk.

I have no doubt Edwards would stop any laws passing that would put much needed restirctions and or caps on trial lawyers.

If Edwards wasnt backed by shady people, like Baron, and he wasnt a trial lawyer, hed be a good candidate.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: conjur
Because Edwards Can Beat Bush!!!

That just cheapens his stance on the issues, imo.
Well, when you look at the polls that say most dem voters just want someone who can beat Bush (and vote for Kerry because of this), it becomes important for Edwards...

How many voters know nothing about Kerry except that he's leading in the race for the Democratic nomination?

People forget that every story with a headline like "Kerry would beat Bush if the election were held today" also contains a short blurb that shows those same respondents would pick Edwards over Bush...

But yes, there are plenty of reason to support Edwards otherwise :)

Thats a national poll. On a state by state basis Bush wipes the floor with Kerry or Edwards. Polls show Bush carrying all of the red states of 2000 by large margins, while Kerry is barely hanging on to a narrow margin in the blue states of 2000.
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
I would definately prefer Edwards over Kerry who I aint crazy about at all.

But it's.....

Anyone but Bush!!!
 

Romans828

Banned
Feb 14, 2004
525
0
0
Look the people of North Carolina KNOW that Edwards is a joke, its funny as heck just watching the rest of the country getting hoodwinked. It will end though soon enough, when the Kerry politcal machine finds it expediant to do so.

Look bottom line is the guy is a lying, backstabbing trial lawyer from good old NC. He isnt even a one term Senator for petes sake and has ABSOLUTElY NO BUSINESS being President. He started campaigning for president as soon as he was elected here as NC Senator. He has been gone from NC and his job so often its beyond comprehesion. People him call him Senator AWOL.

IF by some miricle, he gets the party nomination he will lose to Bush by 20 points EASY here in NC and its his home. Dont any of you "smart" democrates understand the significance of that? He cliams his stronghold is the south? Yeah right hahahahahah
 

ClueLis

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2003
2,269
0
0
Originally posted by: Nitemare
link

17 reasons to vote for him.

As a Libertarian or moderate, he's not that bad of a choice. Much better than Kerry imho

Notice that the site did not discuss any issues at all (unless you consider the linking to speeches, but he doesn't say a whole lot then, either). The whole page seems to be say "oh, look I'm more attractive than Kerry, and I can win," rather than showing what he stands for. I've noticed this trend on whole for the Democratic party this year. They seem more concerned with winning than trying to talk about issues.
 

JackStorm

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2003
1,216
1
0
Originally posted by: ClueLis
Originally posted by: Nitemare
link

17 reasons to vote for him.

As a Libertarian or moderate, he's not that bad of a choice. Much better than Kerry imho

Notice that the site did not discuss any issues at all (unless you consider the linking to speeches, but he doesn't say a whole lot then, either). The whole page seems to be say "oh, look I'm more attractive than Kerry, and I can win," rather than showing what he stands for. I've noticed this trend on whole for the Democratic party this year. They seem more concerned with winning than trying to talk about issues.

You talking about www.john-edwards.net or www.johnedwards2004.com or both? The first site being an un-official site ( And as such, is a tad fanboy-ish). And the second being the official site. Just Curious.
 

ClueLis

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2003
2,269
0
0
Originally posted by: JackStorm
Originally posted by: ClueLis
Originally posted by: Nitemare
link

17 reasons to vote for him.

As a Libertarian or moderate, he's not that bad of a choice. Much better than Kerry imho

Notice that the site did not discuss any issues at all (unless you consider the linking to speeches, but he doesn't say a whole lot then, either). The whole page seems to be say "oh, look I'm more attractive than Kerry, and I can win," rather than showing what he stands for. I've noticed this trend on whole for the Democratic party this year. They seem more concerned with winning than trying to talk about issues.

You talking about www.john-edwards.net or www.johnedwards2004.com or both? The first site being an un-official site ( And as such, is a tad fanboy-ish). And the second being the official site. Just Curious.

I was referring to the unofficial one. The official site is a bit better, but feels more like empty rhetoric than real statements of view.

 

JackStorm

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2003
1,216
1
0
Originally posted by: ClueLis


I was referring to the unofficial one.

Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up.

The official site is a bit better, but feels more like empty rhetoric than real statements of view.

As for it being "empty rhetoric" I don't know. I'm more inclined to belive him or atleast give him the benefit of the doubt over Dean or Kerry. The idea of Dean or Kerry as president just doesn't sit well with me. Dean is to extreme in my opinion and Kerry has to much baggage.