• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why the left hates Trump so intensely

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sheik Yerbouti said:
OR.. and stay with me here... we can just stop being sexist, so...........
Click to expand...

Not that simple. Men respect work and accomplishment and leadership. Clinton basically never did that. She just had to get on the right track to get to where she was. A man who had a similar work history as her wouldn't really get much traction either.
 
desura said:
Not that simple. Men respect work and accomplishment and leadership. Clinton basically never did that. She just had to get on the right track to get to where she was. A man who had a similar work history as her wouldn't really get much traction either.
Click to expand...
Lol
 
realibrad said:
No, you are trying to link principled and idealistic as being synonymous and they are not. You can be principled and realistic which would be mutually exclusive to idealistic.

Your argument is that she shifted her mind because popular belief was that the TPP was bad. I am saying she did it because she would rather drop support for something she believed in, because she did not want to have an unpopular stance. Rather than defend something that is unpopular, she would just let it go, much in the same way she was against gay marriage while it was popular to be against, and then became for gay marriage once it became popular.

Trump will have no problem doing things that are unpopular, and considering his views, is going to likely do far worse than drop support for something like the TPP.

Your body is amazingly flexible. The positions it must be able to contort into I can only fantasize about.
Click to expand...

No great mystery why you're best known for never understanding anything no matter how simple, like how the two bolded phrases are opposites. Even the really dumb conservatives can probably figure it out.
 
desura said:
Not that simple. Men respect work and accomplishment and leadership. Clinton basically never did that. She just had to get on the right track to get to where she was. A man who had a similar work history as her wouldn't really get much traction either.
Click to expand...
wow... ok... not that it needed it, but this explains your posts a bit more.
 
agent00f said:
No great mystery why you're best known for never understanding anything no matter how simple, like how the two bolded phrases are opposites. Even the really dumb conservatives can probably figure it out.
Click to expand...

The bold phrases are not opposites. Even if you are trying to say the candidates represent those two phrases, they are still not opposites.

I support Trump, by thinking that Hillary was a better pick. I support Sanders by thinking that Hillary was a better pick. I don't think things are opposites that are not opposite. What a crazy mixed up world.
 
realibrad said:
The bold phrases are not opposites. Even if you are trying to say the candidates represent those two phrases, they are still not opposites.

I support Trump, by thinking that Hillary was a better pick. I support Sanders by thinking that Hillary was a better pick. I don't think things are opposites that are not opposite. What a crazy mixed up world.
Click to expand...


Just a heads up that even if you can find some way to make it work in your head, nobody else here is that goddamn stupid.

Not even an exaggeration that even the dumbest conservatives here at least understand some things sometimes.
 
desura said:
Not that simple. Men respect work and accomplishment and leadership. Clinton basically never did that. She just had to get on the right track to get to where she was. A man who had a similar work history as her wouldn't really get much traction either.
Click to expand...

Oh my god you're adorable. You're right though, she should've been a reality TV show star and muddle through running a business with a penchant for branding. That shows work and accomplishment and leadership better than spending a career in government including secretary of state and a state senator position.

Do you even listen to yourself?
 
Yet with being the perfect candidate with experience as a US Senator as well as Secretary of State couldn't motivate Democratic/Independent voters in the states that counted the most to vote for her.
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Yet with being the perfect candidate with experience as a US Senator as well as Secretary of State couldn't motivate Democratic/Independent voters in the states that counted the most to vote for her.
Click to expand...

Hardly any surprise with you & brad as posterkids for that "independent" crowd.
 
Those Russian Psy-Ops were so strong they brain washed Democrat voters in the states that counted the most and caused them to abandon "The Annointed One"
 
The left and right are created by the people in power to keep us bickering and fighting over nonsense.

Let's move beyond this level of argument.

We are all on the same boat so let's work together.
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Those Russian Psy-Ops were so strong they brain washed Democrat voters in the states that counted the most and caused them to abandon "The Annointed One"
Click to expand...

No, just turning the race resentment to 11 was enough in addition to getting out every "dis white-country vote out there. Of all the candidates, even you wouldn't disagree Trump is uniquely experienced at this, which is a great asset to the rust belt strategy. Brad might though, he's that fucking stupid.
 
agent00f said:
No, just turning the race resentment to 11 was enough in addition to getting out every white-country vote out there. Of all the candidates, even you wouldn't disagree Trump has by far the most experience at this. Brad might though, he's that fucking stupid.
Click to expand...

It's like continued lulz... 😀 Hahaha...
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Maybe just maybe some on the left caused others on the left to dislike Clinton and why those voters chose not to vote for her.
Click to expand...

That must be why she got nearly the same votes as obama. I'm curious if there's anything that might convince dummies they're not any good at thinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top