Viper:
No, disrespect, but lemme understand this: you're okay with homosexuality as long as you never see it, and gays keep said homosexuality "in the bedroom". Um, do you not see where that position could be construed as intolerant towards gays despite your protestations to the contrary?
I mean, you probably wouldn't appreciate it very much if you were told that you weren't allowed to hold hands with (or God forbid kiss) your boy/girlfriend in public, get married, or respond honestly to questions like "so, who are you going on vacation with?" In fact, I don't know you, but I'd *guess* that your reaction to someone telling you that would be "fsck you, I can do what I want, I'm happy with who I am, and I won't be shoved in the bedroom." I imagine you might wonder just what the other person has against straight people. This is not to say that I'm calling you a bigot (I don't know you), but rather, hopefully, to point out that this position is in and of itself discriminatory, or has discriminatory consequences.
But that's exactly what you're asking of gays. If gays were allowed to show public affection without stigma just like straights, get married just like straights, and be frank and open about their lives and partners just like straights, then Gay Pride Month would be irrelevant and unnecessary. Unfortunately, gays can't do any of those things, hence stuff like Gay Pride parades, months, etc. Tolerance is more than "I won't actively hunt you down and kick your ass."
That said, anytime you call someone names, whether "homophobe" or "liberal," has pretty much stopped trying. But to be fair, Doboji had a
after the "own up to being homophobes" comment; he was being facetious, I think, or at least mostly so.
-brennan