Originally posted by: nealh
Originally posted by: Eeezee
I don't have anything else to add. Why are we ranked so poorly, and what can be done to improve this ranking?
What was the source of this information
Always remember almost anything can be manipulated to show what one wants..esp. with any type of stats.
Yes we have a large uninsured population in this country...but do you have any idea what resources are available to the uninsured..may counties in our states have healthplans for free, many physician discount or give away free care
Many of our so called uninsured would rather buy cigs, cellphones, beer, big screen TVs etc...I see plenty of people who are young who feel they have no need for insurance. How about those nice young diabetics who do not take care of themsleves at all....then 10yrs later they have a heart attack, stroke, etc . If you think this would not obscure this types of reports you are naive. This is just one disease where patients are non-compliant. In our country we have lost our sense of personal responsibility and want to blame everyone else. Many of our problems are from wanting what we cant have and we will spend to get it even if we will never be able to afford.
This kind of ranking are for the most part BS
http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
World Health Organization
Can you believe it? We're BELOW Costa Rica!!!
http://www.who.int/whr/2000/me...ntre/press_release/en/
In designing the framework for health system performance, WHO broke new methodological ground, employing a technique not previously used for health systems.
It compares each country's system to what the experts estimate to be the upper limit of what can be done with the level of resources available in that country. It also measures what each country's system has accomplished in comparison with those of other countries.
WHO's assessment system was based on five indicators: overall level of population health; health inequalities (or disparities) within the population; overall level of health system responsiveness (a combination of patient satisfaction and how well the system acts); distribution of responsiveness within the population (how well people of varying economic status find that they are served by the health system); and the distribution of the health system's financial burden within the population (who pays the costs).
"We have created a new tool to help us measure performance," says Dr Murray. "As we develop it further and strengthen the raw data used for these measures in the years to come, we believe this will be an increasingly useful tool for governments in improving their own health systems."
Other findings in the annual WHO report include:
* In Europe, health systems in Mediterranean countries such as France, Italy and Spain are rated higher than others in the continent. Norway is the highest Scandinavian nation, at 11th .
* Colombia, Chile, Costa Rica and Cuba are rated highest among the Latin American nations ? 22nd, 33rd, 36th and 39th in the world, respectively.
* Singapore is ranked 6th , the only Asian country apart from Japan in the top 10 countries.
* In the Pacific, Australia ranks 32 nd overall, while New Zealand is 41st .
* In the Middle East and North Africa, many countries rank highly: Oman is in 8 th place overall, Saudi Arabia is ranked 26th , United Arab Emirates 27th and Morocco, 29th.
I stand by my belief that lawyers and lobbyists are destroying this country. The well funded lobbyist is the strongest force is this country. Insurance companies can just pay lobbyists and they can do whatever they want. They can also just pay off the politicians themselves