• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why is it that people who trust in God get nothing?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: NSFW
Why is it that people with spiritual questions seek answers from a group of mostly atheist and agnostic people? If you really want your question answered, talk to someone with actual knowledge of these things.

Because then the "people with spiritual questions" wouldn't be trolling...

Also, we would miss out on all the fun of reading the comments of the atheists and agnostics!
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
And regarding the bolded part, the majority of people in the world don't believe in "God". The majority of people in the world believe in a million different ones. You can hardly find two people of the same branch, of the same sect, of the same religion who would agree 100% about the nature of God... which brings us back to begging the question... which God, which Devil?

People don't agree 100% about the nature of each other, either. There could be 100 people who know you, DangerAardvark, and all have different opinions and (mis)conceptions about you, yet you are one person. The same can be true regarding a deity.
 
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
And regarding the bolded part, the majority of people in the world don't believe in "God". The majority of people in the world believe in a million different ones. You can hardly find two people of the same branch, of the same sect, of the same religion who would agree 100% about the nature of God... which brings us back to begging the question... which God, which Devil?

People don't agree 100% about the nature of each other, either. There could be 100 people who know you, DangerAardvark, and all have different opinions and (mis)conceptions about you, yet you are one person. The same can be true regarding a deity.

Let's say that these 100 people who "know" me are self-proclaimed experts on me, each representing a different faction, each with a different opinion about my specific properties. The first person dictates a manuscript in which he claims to possess knowledge that I am 7 feet tall, granted to him via personal revelation. Person two composes a treatise in which he professes knowledge that I am 5 feet tall, having had this fact revealed to him after a period of solemn prayer.

Now let's introduce person 3. He's not one of the original 100. In fact, he's never met me at all. But he has read both person 1 and 2's books. And he has a measuring tape. So he looks me up in the phone book and settles the question once and for all.

And that's the difference. The height of a DangerAardvark can be ascertained through objective, third-party, repeatable observation. What is the height of God?
 
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: NSFW
Why is it that people with spiritual questions seek answers from a group of mostly atheist and agnostic people? If you really want your question answered, talk to someone with actual knowledge of these things.

Because then the "people with spiritual questions" wouldn't be trolling...

Also, we would miss out on all the fun of reading the comments of the atheists and agnostics!

Of course. I respect those that come right out and say that they are atheist or agnostic. Those that pretend to be lost just to stir up the pot are worthless IMHO.

In other news, my fly shaped gel stress reliever ball with realistic maggots arrived yesterday from dealextreme. Its frickin awesome.
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
This entire topic is a giant case of begging the question. We not only assume that God and the Devil exist, but we assume they have certain properties, that it is both possible and common to make a deal either or both of them, then we ask people to simply assert a justification for this situation. It's a circle-jerk.

Interesting that you bring up the point of multiple perspectives subsequently, but completely ignore that you're bringing in your own particular subjectivity into this part which then generates your own negative reaction. You assume that I assume that the Devil exists, and you're wrong. The question can be looked at completely from a figurative or a second-party subjective point of view, without the necessary existence of the Devil or in the second case, even of God. It is a good question for a moral or theological novice, and perhaps more.

Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
And regarding the bolded part, the majority of people in the world don't believe in "God".

Sure they do, and to say otherwise is willfully ignorant. There are indeed billions of different interpretations of God, but for the most part, these perspectives believe they have the same referent. It is valid to discuss God as One or zero from different perspectives. It is not valid however to confuse a discussion of God as One with God as zero.
 
Originally posted by: Tiamat
I have not noticed the trend as stated in your topic title. In fact, I have noticed the opposite!

Yea me too. In general, Christians live very fulfilled and happy lives. The exception to this are those who follow a very Puritan way of christianity, but that is a minority that dwells on misery.
 
Originally posted by: AreaCode707

I think that's fairly close to what my viewpoint would be if I were not religious (though you're a little more generous in caring about humanity than I am; not planning to have kids and am relatively disinterested in the survival of our species beyond my own lifespan 🙂)

Why aren't you interested in the survival of our species? Is it because of the fortune telling in revelations, or something else? 🙂 :heart:
 
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
This entire topic is a giant case of begging the question. We not only assume that God and the Devil exist, but we assume they have certain properties, that it is both possible and common to make a deal either or both of them, then we ask people to simply assert a justification for this situation. It's a circle-jerk.

Interesting that you bring up the point of multiple perspectives subsequently, but completely ignore that you're bringing in your own particular subjectivity into this part which then generates your own negative reaction. You assume that I assume that the Devil exists, and you're wrong. The question can be looked at completely from a figurative or a second-party subjective point of view, without the necessary existence of the Devil or in the second case, even of God. It is a good question for a moral or theological novice, and perhaps more.

Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
And regarding the bolded part, the majority of people in the world don't believe in "God".

Sure they do, and to say otherwise is willfully ignorant. There are indeed billions of different interpretations of God, but for the most part, these perspectives believe they have the same referent. It is valid to discuss God as One or zero from different perspectives. It is not valid however to confuse a discussion of God as One with God as zero.

Willful ignorance is to conflate Vishnu with Yahweh with Quetzacoatl and say that they all refer to the same thing. No. Not even in the same ballpark.

As for the first part, "multiple perspectives" wasn't the point of what you quoted. The point was not "there are multiple interpretations of God and the Devil, therefor the question is meaningless", the point was that the OP has several unstated major premises in the title, and this post
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
This is a good thread. Next, let's debate the mating rituals of the Bigfoots. Then we can discuss the migration patterns of mermaids.

Talk about putting the cart before the horse...
was meant to present analogous, yet patently ridiculous situations in order to illustrate the ridiculousness of this thread. But apparently no one got it, because you guys are making me explain it in excruciating detail.
 
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: Tiamat
I have not noticed the trend as stated in your topic title. In fact, I have noticed the opposite!

Yea me too. In general, Christians live very fulfilled and happy lives. The exception to this are those who follow a very Puritan way of christianity, but that is a minority that dwells on misery.

Same. I believe God has answered some of my prayers. 😀
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Willful ignorance is to conflate Vishnu with Yahweh with Quetzacoatl and say that they all refer to the same thing. No. Not even in the same ballpark.

Your own opinion is that these are all nothing, from that point of view, they're actually all the same, and for you to treat them as other than nothing is intellectually dishonest. You're not participating in the discussion meaningfully, you're just repeating your position that God doesn't exist. We got that.
 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
And regarding the bolded part, the majority of people in the world don't believe in "God". The majority of people in the world believe in a million different ones. You can hardly find two people of the same branch, of the same sect, of the same religion who would agree 100% about the nature of God... which brings us back to begging the question... which God, which Devil?

People don't agree 100% about the nature of each other, either. There could be 100 people who know you, DangerAardvark, and all have different opinions and (mis)conceptions about you, yet you are one person. The same can be true regarding a deity.

Let's say that these 100 people who "know" me are self-proclaimed experts on me, each representing a different faction, each with a different opinion about my specific properties. The first person dictates a manuscript in which he claims to possess knowledge that I am 7 feet tall, granted to him via personal revelation. Person two composes a treatise in which he professes knowledge that I am 5 feet tall, having had this fact revealed to him after a period of solemn prayer.

Now let's introduce person 3. He's not one of the original 100. In fact, he's never met me at all. But he has read both person 1 and 2's books. And he has a measuring tape. So he looks me up in the phone book and settles the question once and for all.

And that's the difference. The height of a DangerAardvark can be ascertained through objective, third-party, repeatable observation. What is the height of God?

And person #3 proves #'s 1 & 2 are incorrect, but they are all nevertheless still worshiping what each perceives to be the same DangerAardvark. Person #1 says you were levitating, person #2 says you were seated upon your throne.

Your example really isn't that good for this particular topic, because you have chosen a measurable aspect. Characteristics which are not particularly measurable - compassion, cruelty, wisdom, etc. - can't be qualified. Person #4 can think you're a jerk because you "rub him the wrong way", person #5 thinks you are cool because you "tell it like it is". Both are aspects of the same person, interpreted differently.

 
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: AreaCode707

I think that's fairly close to what my viewpoint would be if I were not religious (though you're a little more generous in caring about humanity than I am; not planning to have kids and am relatively disinterested in the survival of our species beyond my own lifespan 🙂)

Why aren't you interested in the survival of our species? Is it because of the fortune telling in revelations, or something else? 🙂 :heart:

How do I explain disinterest? I care about my friends, I care about the world about me, and I care about the currently-living who are in need. I have trouble caring about the species as an abstract. What is there to commend us? We have nothing to compare ourselves against; maybe there's alien life out there, and then we may have a benchmark to say whether we're worth surviving. 🙂

I dunno, if we end we end and there's no one to mourn our ending. If the Christians are right, the only sad thing about the ending is the lack of time to bring more to Christ. If the athiests are right, there's nothing sad because there's nobody left to be sad. If the religions believing in reincarnation is right there's nothing sad because we're all something else.
 
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: AreaCode707

I think that's fairly close to what my viewpoint would be if I were not religious (though you're a little more generous in caring about humanity than I am; not planning to have kids and am relatively disinterested in the survival of our species beyond my own lifespan 🙂)

Why aren't you interested in the survival of our species? Is it because of the fortune telling in revelations, or something else? 🙂 :heart:

How do I explain disinterest? I care about my friends, I care about the world about me, and I care about the currently-living who are in need. I have trouble caring about the species as an abstract. What is there to commend us? We have nothing to compare ourselves against; maybe there's alien life out there, and then we may have a benchmark to say whether we're worth surviving. 🙂

I dunno, if we end we end and there's no one to mourn our ending. If the Christians are right, the only sad thing about the ending is the lack of time to bring more to Christ. If the athiests are right, there's nothing sad because there's nobody left to be sad. If the religions believing in reincarnation is right there's nothing sad because we're all something else.

Shouldn't "worth" be inherent, rather than a comparison?
 
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: AreaCode707

I think that's fairly close to what my viewpoint would be if I were not religious (though you're a little more generous in caring about humanity than I am; not planning to have kids and am relatively disinterested in the survival of our species beyond my own lifespan 🙂)

Why aren't you interested in the survival of our species? Is it because of the fortune telling in revelations, or something else? 🙂 :heart:

How do I explain disinterest? I care about my friends, I care about the world about me, and I care about the currently-living who are in need. I have trouble caring about the species as an abstract. What is there to commend us? We have nothing to compare ourselves against; maybe there's alien life out there, and then we may have a benchmark to say whether we're worth surviving. 🙂

I dunno, if we end we end and there's no one to mourn our ending. If the Christians are right, the only sad thing about the ending is the lack of time to bring more to Christ. If the athiests are right, there's nothing sad because there's nobody left to be sad. If the religions believing in reincarnation is right there's nothing sad because we're all something else.

Shouldn't "worth" be inherent, rather than a comparison?

Yeah, it should. I can't and won't argue that. 🙂 I just don't have a strong connection or response to the idea of species survival for its' own sake. No logical reason for it, I suppose.
 
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Willful ignorance is to conflate Vishnu with Yahweh with Quetzacoatl and say that they all refer to the same thing. No. Not even in the same ballpark.

Your own opinion is that these are all nothing, from that point of view, they're actually all the same, and for you to treat them as other than nothing is intellectually dishonest. You're not participating in the discussion meaningfully, you're just repeating your position that God doesn't exist. We got that.

Please quote the post where I said God doesn't exist. You do realize that my posts remain after I've posted them, right? So if you, for example... LIE about something I've posted, it's possible to go and check it... right? But hey, you keep right on dodging my points and arguing against that strawman you've set up for yourself.
 
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: zerocool84
The Devil hasn't done sh!t for me.

God hasn't done shit for anyone. At least the devil seems less inclined to molest little kids.

Devil 1 - God 0

Alright, we all get that some priests have molested kids. I'm not Catholic and in no way want to make it seem like the guys that do that are anything less than evil, but there is a much higher rate of sexual crimes committed against kids by teachers in public schools than priests in Catholic Churches. That rarely gets press, and I don't hear about hundred million dollar payouts from school systems...

 
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Please quote the post where I said God doesn't exist. You do realize that my posts remain after I've posted them, right? So if you, for example... LIE about something I've posted, it's possible to go and check it... right? But hey, you keep right on dodging my points and arguing against that strawman you've set up for yourself.

I sincerely apologize if I've completely misunderstood you, but that conclusion I drew from what I took to be the gist of your posts. Please feel free to correct me in detail by outlining the theism which you subscribe to.
 
I don't believe either actually exists outside of our own mind's method of sorting out right from wrong as something that happened as an evolutionary and social trait. But I do think people that are able to look back at their own lives and see things as good generally are happier regardless of the possessions that they have or social standing. For many people being part of a church is a social outing in itself and can provide an emotional connection with people and a sense of community that they wouldn't get otherwise. Thus, they are happy with less.

However, your statement holds true partially because people heavily into religion also spend a lot of time and money on that religion whereas people who aren't religious tend to put that energy towards other things. And yes, often people put it towards less virtuous things (*cough*L Ron Hubbard*cough*).

I think the reason that you see more "religious poor" is that they are using the faith as a way of keeping a positive mindset and a straight life, which there is nothing wrong with, and is quite beneficial in itself.
 
Luke 18:25

"For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."

Qur'an 7-40:

"For those who reject Our Signs and turn away from them in disdain, the gates of heaven will not be opened, and they will not enter Paradise until their pride and arrogance are so humbled and reduced that they can pass through the eye of a needle."

Trans., Muhammad Zafrulla Khan.

Two points:

1. A direct reference to the difficulty that wealth creates for spirituality.
2. A parallel reference from a different religion.

This is really not hard to understand, nor to see reflected in many religions. The difficulties one encounters are likely to be personal ones, where one asks, "Well, I was pretty good and made some money for my work, I might look like a camel perhaps, but why shouldn't I go to heaven?"

Edit: I'll leave the interpretation up to you for yourself.
 
Back
Top