Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
Cats and dogs are cute. Really, that's all there is to it.
We don't like to eat the cute animals.
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
Cats and dogs are cute. Really, that's all there is to it.
We don't like to eat the cute animals.
rabbits are cute and so are lambs
both of those are tasty
I'm going to train a protection chicken, and it's going to get a Schutzhund I title.Originally posted by: z42
Originally posted by: JToxic
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Because cows and chickens are delicious, while dogs and cats are not.
The reason they're kept as pets is because humans decided their other uses outweigh their use as food.
Why can't they be both? And quite frankly, dogs are rarely useful unless you are a sheep herder.
I think dogs are a little more useful in security than chickens or cows are. They are also much more trainable. And cats were and still are very useful in containing rodent populations.
Originally posted by: Vic
Because we eat herbivores and not other carnivores.
Yup. Pigs are also smarter than pretty much any other animal we eat regularly, and smarter than most of our domesticated animals as well. They're kind of the exception to the rule.Originally posted by: Lucifer
Originally posted by: Vic
Because we eat herbivores and not other carnivores.
But pigs eat anything.
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Pets can be grown outside you know. Pigs are really smart in fact, smarter than dogs.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
because some people are arrogant and stupid enough to think their values should be imposed on everyone else.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
First off, there's the "don't eat another carnivore/omnivore" thing that's stamped into our DNA. Part of the food chain and whatnot. Though I wouldn't mind trying Bear.
Secondly, with very little exception carnivore and omnivore meat is not enjoyable to the human tongue. I have heard dog described as "oily, with a strong aftertaste" and cat as "like eating a duck's ass." (seriously)
Third, it's a context issue. People commonly keep cats and dogs as pets, and make friends with them. They are never thought of as being a herd animal. Basically, since nobody farm-raises cats and dogs for mass slaughter, people can't accept the idea. It's a bit of a Catch-22, but that's basically how it works. If any of us had been raised in a society where butchers commonly or even rarely had cat meat available it wouldn't be an issue.
Fourth, cats and dogs are way smarter than 90% of the animals we use as food. (Pigs being an example of something that is smarter than a cat or dog. Really) Cows and Chickens are just so damn stupid it's hard to feel much for them beyond a certain fondness, and even then it usually only extends to individuals, not the entire species. I used to have chickens as pets; I wouldn't want to eat any of my chickens, but I wasn't shy about stopping at KFC every now and then. Not at all. But all cats and dogs have personality, something about them which reminds us of, well, us. We can tell they're sentient, and thusly we don't want to eat them.
Agreed.Originally posted by: Narse
Originally posted by: yukichigai
First off, there's the "don't eat another carnivore/omnivore" thing that's stamped into our DNA. Part of the food chain and whatnot. Though I wouldn't mind trying Bear.
Secondly, with very little exception carnivore and omnivore meat is not enjoyable to the human tongue. I have heard dog described as "oily, with a strong aftertaste" and cat as "like eating a duck's ass." (seriously)
Third, it's a context issue. People commonly keep cats and dogs as pets, and make friends with them. They are never thought of as being a herd animal. Basically, since nobody farm-raises cats and dogs for mass slaughter, people can't accept the idea. It's a bit of a Catch-22, but that's basically how it works. If any of us had been raised in a society where butchers commonly or even rarely had cat meat available it wouldn't be an issue.
Fourth, cats and dogs are way smarter than 90% of the animals we use as food. (Pigs being an example of something that is smarter than a cat or dog. Really) Cows and Chickens are just so damn stupid it's hard to feel much for them beyond a certain fondness, and even then it usually only extends to individuals, not the entire species. I used to have chickens as pets; I wouldn't want to eat any of my chickens, but I wasn't shy about stopping at KFC every now and then. Not at all. But all cats and dogs have personality, something about them which reminds us of, well, us. We can tell they're sentient, and thusly we don't want to eat them.
Wow thats it, well thought out, /bow
Originally posted by: JToxic
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Because cows and chickens are delicious, while dogs and cats are not.
The reason they're kept as pets is because humans decided their other uses outweigh their use as food.
Why can't they be both? And quite frankly, dogs are rarely useful unless you are a sheep herder.
Originally posted by: Lucifer
Originally posted by: Vic
Because we eat herbivores and not other carnivores.
But pigs eat anything. And people love eating pork.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: Lucifer
Originally posted by: Vic
Because we eat herbivores and not other carnivores.
But pigs eat anything. And people love eating pork.
People also enjoy eating Shrimp, Lobster, and Crab. All sea-based scavengers, as a pig is a land based scavenger. How do you classify a scavenger in the carnivore/omnivore/herbivore matrix?
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Depends...pigs would be primarily herbivorous, with omnivorous tendencies.
Rats would be straight up omnivorous, and vultures are straight carnivorous, though scavengers.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Depends...pigs would be primarily herbivorous, with omnivorous tendencies.
Rats would be straight up omnivorous, and vultures are straight carnivorous, though scavengers.
You are classifying these as a layman would, not a biologist/zoologist.
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Depends...pigs would be primarily herbivorous, with omnivorous tendencies.
Rats would be straight up omnivorous, and vultures are straight carnivorous, though scavengers.
You are classifying these as a layman would, not a biologist/zoologist.
Funny...because I am a biologist/zoologist. Scavengers are classified as scavengers. Whether or not they're carn/herb/omnivorous depends on which gives them the most nutrition.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Depends...pigs would be primarily herbivorous, with omnivorous tendencies.
Rats would be straight up omnivorous, and vultures are straight carnivorous, though scavengers.
You are classifying these as a layman would, not a biologist/zoologist.
Funny...because I am a biologist/zoologist. Scavengers are classified as scavengers. Whether or not they're carn/herb/omnivorous depends on which gives them the most nutrition.
hahahaha owned.![]()
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Because cows and chickens are delicious, while dogs and cats are not.
The reason they're kept as pets is because humans decided their other uses outweigh their use as food.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Depends...pigs would be primarily herbivorous, with omnivorous tendencies.
Rats would be straight up omnivorous, and vultures are straight carnivorous, though scavengers.
You are classifying these as a layman would, not a biologist/zoologist.
Funny...because I am a biologist/zoologist. Scavengers are classified as scavengers. Whether or not they're carn/herb/omnivorous depends on which gives them the most nutrition.
hahahaha owned.![]()
not really his straight carnivore/though scavengers was ambiguous. However...to the point a vulture would chose a herbivore carcass over a carnivore one.
gg though.
