Hard boiled egg, cooked chicken sausage, cooked ham/canadian bacon.Also is there an easier food to prep first thing in the morning? Doesn't make it good or healthy, but barrier to entry is about as low as it gets.
Oh trust me I'm with you, if I do eat breakfast, it's scrambled eggs. But society has people so trained that if it's not put a box in the microwave, press a button and a meal, probably doesn't happen. So that's why cereal is so attractive, you pour a box, pour some milk and you have a "meal".Hard boiled egg, cooked chicken sausage, cooked ham/canadian bacon.
I get it that cereal is a less than 30 second meal but all of the above takes less than 3-5 minutes to prepare. Even a damn omelet takes less than 5 minutes to prepare if whatever you add to it is already cooked / doesn't need to be cooked.
People kill me when they say they don't have time for breakfast in the morning. Seriously? You can't wake up 10-15 minutes earlier to have a real meal and sit down? Unless you're leaving for work at 5 am I really hate that excuse.
Oh absolutely. And generally reinforced as a kid, where fun, sugary cereals hook you and it just becomes a habit. Don't get me wrong, I regularly have cereal for breakfast (usually a small portion on top of greek yogurt, similar to granola with yogurt) but slamming back 500 calories of pure carbohydrates in the morning is terrible.Oh trust me I'm with you, if I do eat breakfast, it's scrambled eggs. But society has people so trained that if it's not put a box in the microwave, press a button and a meal, probably doesn't happen. So that's why cereal is so attractive, you pour a box, pour some milk and you have a "meal".
Cereal+milk is toothslayer combo. Carbs are purely a commodity, a little too readily accessible and thus satisfying the requirement is effortless. Horrible nasty to eat if unsweetened...and readily edible if sweetened but then dentists are smiling everytime folks down that combo. I don't know how milk tastes to genetically "ready" beings in Europeans, but for an Asian like me, it is not sweet, but not neutral either. Lactose-free though, is enough to satisfy my sweet tooth.Cereal is ok, but I agree sausage, eggs, ham and bacon are better.
Parents buy it via "Box tops for education". If only they knew they're setting up their kids for perio and Alzheimer's in the future. It's a brutal regiment of sweets everyday that are likely not waterpik'd or flossed after eating, and will sit there from dawn until dusk, unbrushed. Throw in a "lunch" of sweets. Kids are lucky the dedicious teeth are expendable. But if they maintain the habit once the permanent ones set in, it's going to be a miserable old age life.Oh absolutely. And generally reinforced as a kid, where fun, sugary cereals hook you and it just becomes a habit. Don't get me wrong, I regularly have cereal for breakfast (usually a small portion on top of greek yogurt, similar to granola with yogurt) but slamming back 500 calories of pure carbohydrates in the morning is terrible.
The saturated fat of bacon is at least more forgiving of "neglect" than the unsaturated fats of veggies; I've eat old bacon fat to no known ill effect(like over a week or two). Let the veggie oil sit too long, and then the unholiest of substances coat the pan, which can then only be removed via chemical reaction by a base such as baking soda.A bowl of cereal also only has a bowl and spoon as dishes to wash. The worst part about cooking bacon/sausage is disposing of the grease and cleaning up the pans. The best part is the meal. 😎
Makes perfect sense that a vegetarian would concoct a starch-ridden food; there's no other way to get vegetables down the chute; fruits are an entirely different matter because they are naturally sweet....I guess you never heard of Google. It's was due to marketing.
![]()
How Cereal Became the Quintessential American Breakfast
Cereal's position as America's default breakfast food is a remarkable feat, not of flavor or culture, but of marketing and packaging design. Here's how it all went down.www.seriouseats.com
I don't think...the shift....benefitted society....but to convince the average American to do away with that traditional, meat-laden six-course breakfast.
"nourishment from 1 pound of Grape Nuts than from 10 lbs of MEAT, WHEAT, OATS OR BREAD."
Valid point that it freed up women.More than anything, these cereals promised ease for the American housewife. She could make her life more convenient while still nurturing and providing for her family. And the idea was catching.
Moar CAVITIES and other dental maladies.Of course, companies kept churning out every iteration of sugar-bomb cereal, but those were now winked at as "part of this complete breakfast." You wouldn't just serve your children Pop Tarts Crunch by itself, but throw in some fruit, orange juice, milk and maybe eggs, and it's a perfectly fine component to include. The Fannie Farmer breakfast resurfaced.
FOOD PYRAMID POWAHSAccording to NPR, cereal consumption peaked in 1996 and has been on a steady decline ever since.
I am confused as why you would say that, milk is actually good for your teeth quite a bit. Cereal is likely like any food, it can wear down your teeth, but all foods will do that as you chew. I like bacon, I think a lot of people do, but it is also a type of pork. Though other types of pork can also be good. Of course to each their own, you don't HAVE to like anything. It is personal preference.Cereal+milk is toothslayer combo. Carbs are purely a commodity, a little too readily accessible and thus satisfying the requirement is effortless. Horrible nasty to eat if unsweetened...and readily edible if sweetened but then dentists are smiling everytime folks down that combo. I don't know how milk tastes to genetically "ready" beings in Europeans, but for an Asian like me, it is not sweet, but not neutral either. Lactose-free though, is enough to satisfy my sweet tooth.
Pork with preservatives are hawt garbage foods; bacon is a temptation and vice food because it is so delicious. Although the uncured version should be just fine.
Milk's sugar, lactose, does not taste sweet but it is nevertheless a sugar.. Cereal is loaded with starch and many of the "favorites", like Honey Nut Cherrios and Frosted Flakes, sweeten things up. Milk alone is okay, but it's lack of "flavor" is precisely what then leads to the creation of the sugary cereals like the aforementioned ones; they make the complete "meal" far more palatable to those who don't exactly like plain old milk. The adulterated milk known as Chocolate Milk, which is a preferred option amongst the young and impressionable, is yet another sugar-"enhanced" method of getting kids adults to increase consumption of milk. There is a battle between the local promotion of destructive bacteria in the mouth and the delivery of the beneficial bone-building chemicals to the body.I am confused as why you would say that, milk is actually good for your teeth quite a bit. Cereal is likely like any food, it can wear down your teeth, but all foods will do that as you chew. I like bacon, I think a lot of people do, but it is also a type of pork. Though other types of pork can also be good. Of course to each their own, you don't HAVE to like anything. It is personal preference.
Uh..
Eggs, healthy.
Sausage, ham and bacon, healthy.
I am confused as why you would say that, milk is actually good for your teeth quite a bit. Cereal is likely like any food, it can wear down your teeth, but all foods will do that as you chew. I like bacon, I think a lot of people do, but it is also a type of pork. Though other types of pork can also be good. Of course to each their own, you don't HAVE to like anything. It is personal preference.
There is no evidence that milk is good for your teeth. In fact, there is growing evidence that the more dairy milk you consume, the more risk you accept for negative long-term bone health. Yes, calcium and Vitamin D is good for your teeth, but dairy milk itself is not a premier carrier of those micronutrients.
I don't care if they can or can't be legally advertised as healthy. They are. Is that the bar, because of legal mumbo jumbo (again assuming this is even true) they aren't? You can claim almost ANYTHING is healthy by adding "part of a healthy breakfast". But hey, solid logic!Eggs can not legally be advertised as healthy. You'll note they never say they are in their advertising. They can say they are nutritious, simply because they provide nutrition. But they can't claim they are healthy. The others are so obviously not healthy to need no explanation. That doesn't mean you can't eat them for breakfast, but you can't label a breakfast that includes those foods as a healthy one unless you mean healthy in the frame of "a lot" or "many".
There is no evidence that milk is good for your teeth. In fact, there is growing evidence that the more dairy milk you consume, the more risk you accept for negative long-term bone health. Yes, calcium and Vitamin D is good for your teeth, but dairy milk itself is not a premier carrier of those micronutrients.
It's also relatively easy to seize the means of egg production as long as code allows it, thereby skipping the factory farm conditions.I don't care if they can or can't be legally advertised as healthy. They are. Is that the bar, because of legal mumbo jumbo (again assuming this is even true) they aren't? You can claim almost ANYTHING is healthy by adding "part of a healthy breakfast". But hey, solid logic!
Can they claim water is healthy? Too much of anything isn't healthy.