Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: BUrassler
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Specialized nursing huh?
:roll:
Yeah. Its why healthcare is unaffordable. You can blame the insurance companies, the lawyers, whatever. I blame ridiculous salaries.
Physicians spend 4 years in medical school and 4-5 years in residency depending on their specialization. The process is extremely intense. If they weren't paid high salaries, who would ever think about going to med school?
You have a point. How about 75k, plus student loan reimbursement and pooled insurance risk for all health care employees.
Ever heard of the concept of a free market economy? If we implemented your suggestion into society, I guarantee you we would have a huge shortage of physicians.
Well a very large part of a physician's salary goes towards paying off all of those student loans and also insurance coverage. If they were reimbursed for their student loans and malpractice lawsuits were capped, they would take a significant paycut and still be coming out with a similar net income.
Using the figures provided above, the average Anesthesiologist is paid about 250k a year. Please provide statistics showing that Anesthesiologists pay 175k a year for student loans and insurance coverage.
Well from just talking to the physicians at work, most of them come out of medical school/internship/residency with anywhere from 100-200K+ in debt. Factor in cost of living, car, food, etc etc. It does add up. As someone who works in a hospital I think they are paid what they deserve, probably a biased opinion on wages but I see what they do every day.
You're misconstruing my point. I'm advocating that physicians are indeed paid what they deserve. However, I don't believe that their net income after paying off their student loans and covering their insurance costs is a mere 75k. On a side note, cost of living is a moot point because all people have to pay that.
Heh, ok.Originally posted by: BUrassler
Originally posted by: FeuerFrei
What is the difference between an anesthetist and an anasthesiologist??
Never heard of an anesthetist...
EDIT: apparently it is a british anasthesiologist.
Originally posted by: BUrassler
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: BUrassler
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Specialized nursing huh?
:roll:
Yeah. Its why healthcare is unaffordable. You can blame the insurance companies, the lawyers, whatever. I blame ridiculous salaries.
Physicians spend 4 years in medical school and 4-5 years in residency depending on their specialization. The process is extremely intense. If they weren't paid high salaries, who would ever think about going to med school?
You have a point. How about 75k, plus student loan reimbursement and pooled insurance risk for all health care employees.
Ever heard of the concept of a free market economy? If we implemented your suggestion into society, I guarantee you we would have a huge shortage of physicians.
Well a very large part of a physician's salary goes towards paying off all of those student loans and also insurance coverage. If they were reimbursed for their student loans and malpractice lawsuits were capped, they would take a significant paycut and still be coming out with a similar net income.
Using the figures provided above, the average Anesthesiologist is paid about 250k a year. Please provide statistics showing that Anesthesiologists pay 175k a year for student loans and insurance coverage.
Well from just talking to the physicians at work, most of them come out of medical school/internship/residency with anywhere from 100-200K+ in debt. Factor in cost of living, car, food, etc etc. It does add up. As someone who works in a hospital I think they are paid what they deserve, probably a biased opinion on wages but I see what they do every day.
You're misconstruing my point. I'm advocating that physicians are indeed paid what they deserve. However, I don't believe that their net income after paying off their student loans and covering their insurance costs is a mere 75k. On a side note, cost of living is a moot point because all people have to pay that.
I also agree with you that they net more than 75k. I was just trying to say a very large chunk is loans and insurance.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Sarcasm, right?
Originally posted by: Soccer55
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
LaVar Arrington can run around a football field and tackle people for a lot less than $7 mil/yr. He doesn't even have to pay for malpractice insurance or have 100k+ worth of education debt. So why doesn't he?
-Tom
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Sarcasm, right?
No, and Ive raised it to 75k plus student debt reimbursement over time (tax free) and pooled risk insurance for all medical employees. If you want, you can also add an annual $1000 bonus for every year of service to a max of $30k.
The base of 75k will also be adjusted annually by the average annual inflation rate for the previous year as compiled and released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
My goal is affordable healthcare for all Americans. I think we can make this happen sooner than you might think.![]()
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
This is nothing more than specialized nursing, 50k max.
300k :roll:
Sarcasm, right?
No, and Ive raised it to 75k plus student debt reimbursement over time (tax free) and pooled risk insurance for all medical employees. If you want, you can also add an annual $1000 bonus for every year of service to a max of $30k.
The base of 75k will also be adjusted annually by the average annual inflation rate for the previous year as compiled and released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
My goal is affordable healthcare for all Americans. I think we can make this happen sooner than you might think.![]()
Changing salaries is NOT the way to do it. Do a little research first. And you never answered my other question.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
WHY can it be accomplished for less.
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Any job can/should be accomplished for a certain amount. Should professional athletes and entertainers by paid millions of dollars a year for what they do? Should a CEO of a huge corporation be paid millions of dollars a year? It's not a question of should they be paid that much. If that were the case, we might as well be considered communist.
The fact of the matter is that our economy dictates the way that salaries are allocated to occupations. If the government forced a cap on the salary of Anesthesiologists at 75k a year, we'd have a huge demand for more Anesthesiologists because no one would be willing to go through the med school process for that low of a pay. What would happen then? The pay would increase until the market hits equilibrium, which happens to be at about 250k a year. Everything balances out in a free market economy. Understand now?
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Soccer55
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
LaVar Arrington can run around a football field and tackle people for a lot less than $7 mil/yr. He doesn't even have to pay for malpractice insurance or have 100k+ worth of education debt. So why doesn't he?
-Tom
Yes, but people need healthcare not football. By the way, that is why smaller teams pushed for and won salary caps in most games.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Any job can/should be accomplished for a certain amount. Should professional athletes and entertainers by paid millions of dollars a year for what they do? Should a CEO of a huge corporation be paid millions of dollars a year? It's not a question of should they be paid that much. If that were the case, we might as well be considered communist.
The fact of the matter is that our economy dictates the way that salaries are allocated to occupations. If the government forced a cap on the salary of Anesthesiologists at 75k a year, we'd have a huge demand for more Anesthesiologists because no one would be willing to go through the med school process for that low of a pay. What would happen then? The pay would increase until the market hits equilibrium, which happens to be at about 250k a year. Everything balances out in a free market economy. Understand now?
Athletes and doctors is an apples and oranges argument. Many countries have socialized medicine and are not communist. And you are assuming noone would want to do the job for 75k+cheap insurance and tax free debt reimbursement, adjusted for inflation plus bonus. Understand now?
WHY can it be accomplished for less.[?]
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: dafatha00
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Right. I have no qualms with you on that point. If you noticed above, I was merely attacking FelixDeKat's contention that physicians should only be paid a net income of 75k.
I didnt say all physicians, I said anestheisiologists. And my argument wasnt with the fact that they "deserve" a certain amount, its that the job can / should be accomplished for alot less than it is now.
Any job can/should be accomplished for a certain amount. Should professional athletes and entertainers by paid millions of dollars a year for what they do? Should a CEO of a huge corporation be paid millions of dollars a year? It's not a question of should they be paid that much. If that were the case, we might as well be considered communist.
The fact of the matter is that our economy dictates the way that salaries are allocated to occupations. If the government forced a cap on the salary of Anesthesiologists at 75k a year, we'd have a huge demand for more Anesthesiologists because no one would be willing to go through the med school process for that low of a pay. What would happen then? The pay would increase until the market hits equilibrium, which happens to be at about 250k a year. Everything balances out in a free market economy. Understand now?
Athletes and doctors is an apples and oranges argument. Many countries have socialized medicine and are not communist. And you are assuming noone would want to do the job for 75k+cheap insurance and tax free debt reimbursement, adjusted for inflation plus bonus. Understand now?
Originally posted by: BUrassler
They had a ton of variables they have to factor into their assesment when determining the amount of anestheia needed. To much and they can kill the person, too little and the person will not properly be sedated. If that happens, and they wake up in the midst of a surgery and move around, it can cause a tremendous amount of problems.