- Jun 7, 2003
- 5,334
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: L1FE
since it's just a shell, I wouldn't expect it to have mem usage anyway. However, after heavy use, what's the combined mem usage with IE?
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
Originally posted by: L1FE
since it's just a shell, I wouldn't expect it to have mem usage anyway. However, after heavy use, what's the combined mem usage with IE?
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
you're not using a crappy browser, you're using IE
WMFOriginally posted by: us3rnotfound
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
No, not crappy. You cannot prove to me that it's worse than Mozilla's memory hog of a browsing solution.
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
WMFOriginally posted by: us3rnotfound
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
No, not crappy. You cannot prove to me that it's worse than Mozilla's memory hog of a browsing solution.
/thread
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
No, not crappy. You cannot prove to me that it's worse than Mozilla's memory hog of a browsing solution.
what crappy browser?Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
you're not using a crappy browser, you're using IE
That's the crappy browser I was referring to. ^^;
Originally posted by: Alkesh
i have like 15 firefox tabs open in 3 windows, i'm using 35mb.
check the stickied thread about a windows exploit.Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
WMFOriginally posted by: us3rnotfound
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Yeah. I would have been at least 300 mb usage from FF![]()
It's only a step above IE, ie tabbed browsing. Other than that you're still using that crappy browser.
No, not crappy. You cannot prove to me that it's worse than Mozilla's memory hog of a browsing solution.
/thread
WMF? hrmmm...... Wikimedia Foundation? Windows Media Format? Workload Monitoring Function? Woah Mutherfvcker?
Originally posted by: farmercal
What is the OP talking about? I opened up 24 windows in FF and only used about 94 Meg of memory. How can the OP use 300 Meg of memory?
Yeah, I have no issue getting Firefox past 100-200MB either.Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
Originally posted by: farmercal
What is the OP talking about? I opened up 24 windows in FF and only used about 94 Meg of memory. How can the OP use 300 Meg of memory?
I've done it pretty effortlessly