Why hasn't the GOP repealed Obamacare and where is their alternative Health plan?

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
I think we all believe that some rights involve collective action. If we have the right to trial, to govt & legal representation, to emergency services & so forth we can include the right to medical care as well. We pay cops, judges, firemen, public defenders & so forth so we can obviously pay medical professionals if we, America, decide to do so.

Of course we could, which is why every other western democracy has already moved to single payer/universal coverage. Seems those countries value a healthy population over profits. Because that's about the only reason to refuse to move towards univ. coverage....too worried about ins. co's and their profits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
I think we all believe that some rights involve collective action. If we have the right to trial, to govt & legal representation, to emergency services & so forth we can include the right to medical care as well. We pay cops, judges, firemen, public defenders & so forth so we can obviously pay medical professionals if we, America, decide to do so.

If you want to put together some sort of single payer system, I'm open to hearing about it. Obamacare was the worst all of worlds. It did not provide universal coverage to everyone, it was not affordable and it increased the bureaucracy and red tape

As for single payer, it should be done either through a consumption tax (national sales tax) or a payroll tax. Plans like Bernie Sanders' put way too much burden on the employer. How is it the employer's job to pay the healthcare bills of all Americans?
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
I pay $50/mo. You've been pulling numbers out of your ass the whole thread.

It
Man you are a real horse's ass. The hell I am. I write the checks every month.

Here are some sample premiums for Medicare supplemental plans:

https://www.medicare.gov/find-a-pla...e-policies.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

Looks like a 65 yr old pays about $170/mo. My parents in their 80s pay over $300. I don't give a shit what you pay. These examples are a few hundred a month.

Its time for both of you to man up and post some bills. Obviously cover the names/addresses with a post it. Write hello AT to prove its a real image.
 

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
Of course we could, which is why every other western democracy has already moved to single payer/universal coverage. Seems those countries value a healthy population over profits. Because that's about the only reason to refuse to move towards univ. coverage....too worried about ins. co's and their profits.

There are a lot of other reasons...Americans are used to choices. Ever talked to someone from Great Britain? If you need say a knee surgery this is how it's handled: You get a letter in the mail saying your surgery is scheduled with Dr. So and So at 1pm 5 mos from now. You get no choice as to doctor, hospital, time or place. It's different than what we're used to. It'd be a huge undertaking for our gov't. I'm skeptical that they're up to the task.
 

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
It

Its time for both of you to man up and post some bills. Obviously cover the names/addresses with a post it. Write hello AT to prove its a real image.

Post some bills? Are you really doubting that folks are paying $1400/mo?
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
I'm more wondering why you pay $1400? Just opt out if it sucks that hard. Self employed individuals have been dealing with this just fine for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
There are a lot of other reasons...Americans are used to choices. Ever talked to someone from Great Britain? If you need say a knee surgery this is how it's handled: You get a letter in the mail saying your surgery is scheduled with Dr. So and So at 1pm 5 mos from now. You get no choice as to doctor, hospital, time or place. It's different than what we're used to. It'd be a huge undertaking for our gov't. I'm skeptical that they're up to the task.

The two Canadian dual Citizenship people I've worked with both said regular check ups or minor surgery they'd do here with their company insurance. Anything big they'd go back to Canada for.
 

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
I'm more wondering why you pay $1400? Just opt out if it sucks that hard. Self employed individuals have been dealing with this just fine for decades.

You don't seem to get it. I have no choice. This is the only option I have for health insurance. I'm obligated to have it and I really can't risk going without it anyway. I'm in an area where there's only one choice
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
There are a lot of other reasons...Americans are used to choices. Ever talked to someone from Great Britain? If you need say a knee surgery this is how it's handled: You get a letter in the mail saying your surgery is scheduled with Dr. So and So at 1pm 5 mos from now. You get no choice as to doctor, hospital, time or place. It's different than what we're used to. It'd be a huge undertaking for our gov't. I'm skeptical that they're up to the task.

That sort of system seems to work rather well for the military. And outside of your GP, your choice of surgeon/cardiologist/internist/whomever is very much dictated already for you by who's in your insurance network and typically who your GP recommends. It certainly isn't by quality of the MD...since the AMA is resolutely against any sort of public information being disclosed regarding a doctor's treatment history....numbers of malpractice claims, numbers of untoward complications due to doctor incompetence, etc., etc.

We don't have much in the way of choice these days in choosing hospitals and MDs. Not in network, not covered is the current mantra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
I'm not sure why people want America to stop taking care of it's citizens when it comes to healthcare. Like you said Jhhnn, there's already numerous departments in place to do just that.

Greed, particularly greed at the top.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
Oh, I get it. I'm in MA. We've had required healthcare (or pay a fine) since Romney '04. Are you saying there's no fine, and you will be automatically enrolled and your payment taken?

You don't seem to get it. I have no choice. This is the only option I have for health insurance. I'm obligated to have it and I really can't risk going without it anyway. I'm in an area where there's only one choice
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
That sort of system seems to work rather well for the military. And outside of your GP, your choice of surgeon/cardiologist/internist/whomever is very much dictated already for you by who's in your insurance network and typically who your GP recommends. It certainly isn't by quality of the MD...since the AMA is resolutely against any sort of public information being disclosed regarding a doctor's treatment history....numbers of malpractice claims, numbers of untoward complications due to doctor incompetence, etc., etc.

We don't have much in the way of choice these days in choosing hospitals and MDs. Not in network, not covered is the current mantra.
You're absolutely right that our choices are limited right now and it's gotten much worse under Obamacare. The Republican plan would address those issues
 

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
Oh, I get it. I'm in MA. We've had required healthcare (or pay a fine) since Romney '04. Are you saying there's no fine, and you will be automatically enrolled and your payment taken?
I'm saying that there is a fine if I go without.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/320814-boehner-obamacare-repeal-and-replace-not-going-to-happen

Former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday that a full repeal and replacement of ObamaCare is “not going to happen.”
Instead, Boehner said at a healthcare conference in Florida that Republicans will end up making smaller changes to the law.
“[Congressional Republicans are] going to fix Obamacare — I shouldn’t call it repeal-and-replace, because it’s not going to happen,” Boehner said, according to Politico.
The comments are striking, coming from someone who led Republican opposition to ObamaCare for years.
“Most of the framework of the Affordable Care Act … that’s going to be there,” Boehner reportedly said at the conference, adding that “Republicans never ever agree on healthcare.”
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136

Rands plan relied upon the fallacy that buying insurance across state lines will greatly lower cost. I agree it will lower them but not greatly. Most insurers and states don't want to navigate this minefield.
Rands plan also is cheaper for healthy people because it allows big increases in deductibles and copayments.
I'll give Rand credit its a plan but this is something he banged out in a weekend with some interns its definitely not a well thought out masterpiece that he's been working on for 6 years.