Originally posted by: GunsMadeAmericaFree
>You aren't being forced to buy SATA drives,
Actually, I AM if I want to upgrade. I have 2 IDE optical drives, and 2 IDE hard drives, all of which were purchased not that long ago. I also have a PCI TV tuner card, and PCI Faxmodem, both of which I use all the time. Now I see that pretty much all of the new motherboards have only 3 PCI slots. Guess what? That means I can either:
A) do without 2 of my drives (& buy new SATA ones)
B) do without the Internet (take my modem out)
or
C) no more TV
What the heck kind of a choice is that to force a person to make?
>I've had the opposite problem. I've had SATA cables fail on me when the cheap soft plastic >bends at the connector and it stops making a tight fit, but I've never had an IDE cable fail on >me.
I have to admit I've had an IDE/PATA ribbon fail - just last month actually. It gave the old message about no 80 connector cable, I replaced it, and PC ran just fine afterwards. However, my experience with SATA was much worse - the SATA CONNECTOR on my motherboard ACTUALLY CAME OFF! That's right, I was connecting a cable, pulled it a little bit to make sure it was snug, and the connector came right off of the motherboard. That's the main reason why I think SATA is crap - it simply isn't sturdy enough.
You shouldn't have to listen to uninformed technology crap spouted in places like this by people presumably trying justify their existance ?
It will be some time yet before EIDE or the highly usefull Floppy drive dies out ---> both are very competent in what they do and there is still a large market need for both !
Like with the forced intro of PCIE, the intro of SATA was more about guaranteeing a manufacturers continued existance and profit margins than any drive towards meeting customer or performance needs?
The "enlightened" people who thought up SATA as a technology weren't too bright since they totally ignored that the problems with HDD communication speeds was more about the mechanics of the HDD rather than the interface communication chips or their connectors. Which is why SATA 150 drives were no better that EIDE types. And even today why SATA 300 drives are not much better ---> and certainly no better than would have been achieved by just upgrading the EIDE spec ?
In reality, SATA (seriel communications) is something that should only have emerged to support "electronic" storage technology (flash, etc), not mechanical !
However, let's just say there's a lot more money (profit) involved when you can "con" your customers into replacing existing kit with supposed new techlology that actually isn't really needed ---> it is however very important to make sure that the new kit is not any worse that what it replaces ---> somehing that Intel and others have in the past failed at ?
Of course it would be less easy for manufacturers to get away with such cons if it weren't for the many technology nerds/geeks , who mostly appear to not understand enough to know any better, spending countless hours at forums like this abusing anyone who dares to still want/use "yesterday's" technology. Unfortunally for all but the manufacturer, the nerd/geek is usually driven by a misplaced perception that "new" must mean better ---> and therefore must have ?
To date, I still use "yesterday's" technologies, and as such only purchased mobos which supported a Floppy, 2 EIDE interfaces (preferably ATA133), AGP, and where possible COM and Parallel ports. Meaning for my major jump onto intel C2D cpu (definitely a new technology to follow) bandwaggon, I initially opted for Asrock mobos. However, now having been "forced" into going for a high performance PCIE vga card, I recently purchased a Asus P5N-E mobo since it also directly supports 2xEIDE and all my other invaluable "yesterday's" technology needs.