- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,932
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: Chryso
Because humans no longer believe in survival of the fittest when it applies to humans.
Originally posted by: Kirby64
P&N is this way
|
|
V
Originally posted by: rh71
Hmm I wonder if the rich ever ask about paying much more taxes than the middle/lower classes... I wonder if it's voluntary...
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Convince me why I should be involuntarily paying someone else's way?
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Convince me why I should be involuntarily paying someone else's way?
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
I think theoretically it's so they don't break into your house while you're working and steal your stuff, or mug you in the street.
Convince me of why it's necessary for you to post your trolling "Convince me..." threads when there's nothing that will you convince you to change your mind?
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: rh71
Hmm I wonder if the rich ever ask about paying much more taxes than the middle/lower classes... I wonder if it's voluntary...
All the time. I don't blame them. Consumption tax would be much more appropriate than income. Income is something that should be encouraged not punished in a capitalist country.
Originally posted by: waggy
i have friends who worked for chrysler in IL. they know they were going to lose there job. NOT one of them put anything away because they know they were going to get 6 months unemployment. many were looking into ways of extending it (guess if they lay off a large percent and you go to school its extended to 2 years). they all signed up for foodstamps and such also.
Originally posted by: Baked
Yes, because everybody never gets sick, has a life time guaranteed job and a million dollars in the bank for retirement...
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Chryso
Because humans no longer believe in survival of the fittest when it applies to humans.
I don't follow what you are saying? What does this have to do with survival of the fittest?
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: rh71
Hmm I wonder if the rich ever ask about paying much more taxes than the middle/lower classes... I wonder if it's voluntary...
All the time. I don't blame them. Consumption tax would be much more appropriate than income. Income is something that should be encouraged not punished in a capitalist country.
We pay consumption tax, Sales tax.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: waggy
i have friends who worked for chrysler in IL. they know they were going to lose there job. NOT one of them put anything away because they know they were going to get 6 months unemployment. many were looking into ways of extending it (guess if they lay off a large percent and you go to school its extended to 2 years). they all signed up for foodstamps and such also.
How much did they end up getting? Normal unemployment wouldn't be enough for me to live off of without saving. It's only a fraction of your pay. But I've not heard about the ways to increase/extend it.
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Chryso
Because humans no longer believe in survival of the fittest when it applies to humans.
I don't follow what you are saying? What does this have to do with survival of the fittest?
those who are on welfair/food stamps arnt fit to fend for themselfs
if we practiced survival of the fittest we would let them all die
survival of the fittest not really a hard concept
Originally posted by: xochi
Employers pay Unemployment Insurance and that isnt what i would call Welfare.
Originally posted by: Anubis
im not going to explain a 4th grade topic to you, im going home, figure it out for yourself not that fucking hard
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Kirby64
P&N is this way
|
|
V
no no no its this way
<---------